Groundhog Day, and Me in Three Words

It’s February 2nd, Groundhog day. It’s a North American tradition, one of Punxsutawney’s local events and — at least in my country — national news.

Punxsutawney Phil didn’t see his shadow this year.

North American folklore says that this means we’re in for six more weeks of winter. Which, here in central Minnesota, is likely enough: cloudy day in Punxsutawney or not.

Groundhog Day’s folklore is, or was, superstition.

I see it as an opportunity for Punxsutawney’s VIPs to wear top hats, and a pleasant mid-winter break from shoveling and heating bills.

However, there’s no getting around it. Groundhog Day has roots in Pennsylvania Dutch superstitions. Or folklore. Depends on viewpoint, maybe.

Hoo boy. Groundhog Day’s roots could be trouble.

Being superstitious is one of the things we’re told is a bad idea. It’s religious feeling gone wrong. Really wrong. (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2111)

If I was superstitious about, say, the Divine Mercy Chaplet, I’d think that the words and what I do with the prayer beads had magical effects.

They don’t. Which reminds me: I want to talk about the Divine Mercy chaplet again some time. But not to day.

If I burned berries before a picture of Punxsutawney Phil to lower the household heating bills: my wife would complain. And I’d be well-advised to rethink my attitude toward groundhogs. Which, I see, are the critters I call woodchucks.1

A Pennsylvanian groundhog’s presumed prognostications might lead me down the primrose path to perdition. If I took today’s cloudy weather as a Sign to the Faithful.

Which I don’t. And that’s another topic. Topics.

Adoption: Simply Fill Out These Forms, and These, And – – –


(Another overcast day here in Sauk Centre, Minnesota. (February 2, 2021; 1:25 p.m.))

I talked, briefly, about family and children yesterday. (February 1, 2021)

Recapping, in part: our number-two daughter and son-in-law adopted their daughter. Which is okay. (Catechism, 2379)

The hoops they had to jump through in the adoption process warrant more attention than I’m willing to give today.

The good news, part of it, is that they finally had all the forms filled out. And could spend two months as residents in another state.

My son-in-law, happily, is the sort of entrepreneur who can take a two-month vacation and still have a ‘job’ when he gets back. Not everyone can do that.

I’m pretty sure that many couples who aren’t like our granddaughter’s adoptive parents would also make good mothers and fathers. But we’re not likely to find out, as long as American adoption regulations stay the way they are.

If you’re bracing for a rant, relax. My father and I have, between us, lived through eras that inspired today’s bureaucratic tangle.

Our laws and regulations were, I think, innocuous.

I think the folks who set up the system meant well.

How it actually works could use improvement. Much improvement.

Describing Me in Three Words: and a Three-Week Anniversary


(Me, Saturday before last. I do not usually wear a mask at my desk. (January 23, 2021))

Before I forget — this is my 21st consecutive daily ‘journal’ entry. But, important as this milestone is to me, I don’t expect to see it in national news. And that’s yet another topic.

Now, getting back to the adoption process.

One of the many forms and reports that number-two daughter and son-in-law filled out included instructions to describe, in three words, the prospective adopters’ parents.

Which, I think, makes sense. Or should. In any case, I’m impressed, relieved and pleased that number-two daughter’s three-word description of me didn’t cause trouble.

She, quite accurately, said that I was:

  • Eccentric
  • Scholarly
  • Eclectic

We’re not entirely sure about the second word, “scholarly.” Their copy of the actual report is on a disk drive that is on my son’s to-do list of things to fix. It’s a long list.

But she said I was scholarly or academic, or something like that. And I think she’s right.

She’s right about eccentric and eclectic, too.

Which should be obvious, from the stuff I write:


1 More than pretty much anyone really needs to know about:

Posted in Being Catholic, Journal | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

A Family Visit is Still in Progress: Kids and Adoption

Yesterday’s visit continues. Granddaughter and I have enjoyed watching cartoons. I’m looking forward to reading her a book from my childhood, plus another from my father’s and mine.

Our granddaughter’s parents are her ‘real’ parents in practical terms.

And they adopted her. Which, this family being the way we are, means that our granddaughter has more than the conventional two sets of grandparents.

I don’t mind, partly because I don’t see family relationships as a zero-sum thing.

When we had our second child, I didn’t assume that number-one and number-two daughter would each have half a father.

At any rate, I didn’t fear for our third child, who would — if I made zero-sum assumptions, which I didn’t — suffer from being stuck with a mere third of a father.

The point I’m trying to make is that zero-sum assumptions don’t apply to family relationships. Resource allocation? Sometimes but not always.

But our kids didn’t have a fractionalized father. “Fractionalized???” Never mind.

Then our number three child died, early in the pregnancy. That was not a happy experience. Neither was the death of our sixth child. (October 9, 2016 )

On the ‘up’ side, we have been and are blessed with four surviving children.

And one grandchild.

A Brief, Succinct, Terse and Very Short Look at Family and Children

Streaming together for ThanksgivingIt’s been a while since I talked about what the Church says about family and children.

Books could be and have been written on the subject. But I’m squeezing writing this post into the second and last day of a family visit.

So, briefly: marriage and having kids is a good thing. (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2366-2379)

Not getting married is a good thing.

I’ve touched on vocations before. (January 28, 2021; August 14, 2016)

Sometimes folks who are married can’t, physically, have kids. It’s not the only reason that adopting children is a good idea, but it’s one of them. (Catechism, 2379)

There’s a lot more to say about all of the above.

But I’m running out of ‘today.’

So, briefly: I have enjoyed talks with number-two daughter, son-in-law and granddaughter. My granddaughter and I enjoyed reading her great-grandfather’s childhood special book.

And I’ll add links to posts I referred to while writing this:

Posted in Being Catholic, Family Stories, Journal, Series | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Company has Arrived: A Family Visit in Progress

Our number-two daughter, son-in-law and granddaughter arrived shortly after noon.

We’re celebrating a belated/second Christmas and our granddaughter’s birthday.

Maybe I should have something profound to say. Or at least heartfelt.

But I’m having too much fun, so here are a few maybe-related posts:

Posted in Journal | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Weather: But Mostly Desks and Principles

“Oh, the weather outside is frightful
But the fire is so delightful….”

This morning’s forecast reminded me of “Let It Snow.”

But the weather outside isn’t frightful. Overcast, with a promise of freezing drizzle in the forecast, yes. Frightful, not so much.

On the other hand, freezing drizzle and the snow that’ll likely follow can make driving chancy. Walking, too, at least for folks like me. I’ll be glad to stay inside.

In any case, the Winter Weather Advisory for my part of the world is in effect until midnight. After that, we’ll see. Minnesota weather is — variable.

Now, about “Let It Snow.” I found a brief discussion of the song on Wikipedia. Wikipedia’s Armenian version:

“…The song was written by poet Sammy Kahn and composer Jules Stein on a hot July day in 1945….”
(Let It Snow!…, Վիքիպեդիա (Wikipedia)(Trans. by Google Translate))

I don’t understand the Armenian language, but do have access to Google’s ‘translate’ function. Which works well enough for this sort of thing.

And that’s not what I was going to talk about today.

My Alternatively-Tidy Desk


(My desk, yesterday morning: clutter and all.)

Maybe I’d be a more productive writer if I decluttered my desk. But probably not.

There’s a profusion of helpful how-2 hint articles about decluttering. Many of which aren’t obvious long-form advertisements for desk accessories.

But don’t hold your breath, waiting for me to post an “after” photo, presenting nothing but the basic essentials.

I like my desk the way it is.

Trappist monk, reading. Daniel Tibi's photo, used w/o permission. (2007)Even though it doesn’t resemble a Trappist monk’s workspace.

What looks like clutter to you — and probably most folks — suits me fine. And is more organized than it may seem.

The keyboard and monitor are front and center, since they’re what I’m almost constantly using.

Sitting on the desk’s left corner is a book I plan to do a review for. Eventually. The rosary beads between it and the keyboard are there as a reminder that I do Divine Mercy chaplets daily. Cheat sheets for my morning prayers are in a folder near the photo’s right side.

I wouldn’t claim that it’s the most streamlined workspace in North America. But it’s organized and efficient. For me, by my standards.

One of my daughters is at another end of the desk organization continuum. Her workspace makes that Trappist monk’s desk look like a thrift store’s sorting table.

She’s said that she couldn’t write at a desk like mine. I believe her.

Maybe I could write at a desk like hers, but I wouldn’t want to try. I like having doodads, thingummies, knickknacks and frequently-used objects in sight and ready at hand.

I also like baroque and rococo, and that’s almost another topic.

Personal Preference, Unchanging Principles

So, how come I’m not upset that my daughter’s desk doesn’t look like mine?

And why isn’t she on a crusade to rid the world of insufficiently Spartan desks?

Starting by purging mine.

I figure her reason is pretty much like mine. As long as we’re not both trying to use the same desk, it doesn’t matter.

There are unchanging principles, woven into the very fabric of reality. (September 13, 2018; February 5, 2017)

“Cluttered desks are bad” is not one of those unchanging principles.

Besides, we’re both human. And Catholic. So I’d jolly well better recognize that my kids are not just like me: and accept that.

Humans aren’t cookie-cutter critters. We’re not all alike. That’s okay. We’re not supposed to be. But we each have equal dignity. (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 361, 369370, 1929, 19341938, 2393)

Desks, Daughters, My Son and Differences

L. N. Kaas estate sale. (March 2019)Which reminds me of a story

Back when my wife and her siblings were in high school, someone from the school called their father with a disturbing message.

‘Do you know,’ said the educational official, ‘that your daughter wants to take shop?!’

Putting the school official’s concern in historical and cultural context: this was around 1970 in the Upper Midwest.

Boys took shop. Girls took home economics. And guys like me enjoyed art class, anyway: which is yet again another topic. Topics.

Anyway, presented with a presumably-horrifying pronouncement, my father-in-law-to-be said ‘so? Let her!’ She took shop, one of my brothers-in-law took home ec. And so did a whole lot of other guys, once they twigged that home ec was where girls were.

Which I figure was why my brother-in-law signed up. Other than his interest in cookery.

The point is that responsibilities come with being a parent. (Catechism, 22212231)

Those responsibilities do not include telling my kids whether or not they should marry. Or who they should marry. Or what their profession should be. (Catechism, 2230)

Desk preferences aren’t explicitly mentioned, but I figure the ‘your kids are people, not property’ principle applies there, too. (Catechism, 2378)

Next: Coffee Break

Michał Elwiro Andriolli's Pan Twardowski and the devil. (1895)Good news: I got some writing for my next “Dr. Faustus” post done yesterday.

Bad, or at any rate frustrating news: I can’t use what I wrote. Not the way it is now. The ideas are okay, but how I expressed them would be a snooze-fest.

At least, I think the ideas are okay. I’ll be taking a look at that, along with deciding whether or not to delete what I did and start over.

Whatever I decide, I’m pretty sure that a coffee break is in order.

Right after I slap together my usual ‘stuff that’s sort of related’ list:

Posted in Being Catholic, Journal | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Plans, Prescriptions, an Exoplanet and Me

I only wrote 18 words for my current “Dr Faustus” post yesterday. Partly because the screen went black around mid-afternoon. On the bright side, my computer did reboot. Eventually.

My plan for today is to get this journal entry finished, do more writing and maybe pick up prescriptions at the local Walmart. Not necessarily in that order.

Prescriptions During a Pandemic: Mostly Routine

CentraCare, Sauk Centre, Minnesota.The last few times I’ve called prescription requests in, the pharmacy’s recorded introduction told me that COVID-19 vaccines are not yet available in my state.

Probably because that’s the most common question. Or among the most common. Understandably, I suppose.

My reaction to the Walmart pharmacy’s unsolicited announcement is — a trifle complicated.

I’m not elated to have an extra few seconds added to the time I wait before entering my prescription requests. But letting what’s at worst a minor delay inspire annoyance strikes me as a waste of effort.

Besides, I’m curious about when COVID-19 vaccinations will come to folks like me. I’ve talked about that before. Along with a mess of other topics.

Getting prescriptions during the COVID-19 pandemic as been uneventful. Which I don’t mind a bit. Particularly since production and shipment of the meds could have been, and probably was, affected by pandemic precautions. And that’s another topic. Almost.

Kepler-22b: NASA’s Exoplanet Image of the Day for Tuesday

NASA/Ames/JPL-Caltech's comparison of Solar and Kepler 22 systems. (2018)I noticed Kepler-22b in this week’s ‘science news,’ which seemed odd: since the ‘news’ was that Kepler-22b was around 2.4 times Earth’s diameter, orbiting a sun-like star and in the star’s habitable zone.

It’s true, and historically significant, but hasn’t been news for years.

Then I saw that it was NASA’s exoplanet ‘image of the day.’

I’ve talked about the ongoing search for ‘Earth 2.0,’ and mentioned Kepler-22b, a few years back. (June 30, 2017)

Not-necessarily-related essays/posts:

Posted in Being a Writer, Journal | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment