A Trilobite With a Hyper-Compound Eye

It’s barely over two weeks since scientists at the University of Cologne published what they’d learned about a trilobite’s unique eye.

Their research vindicated an amateur paleontologist’s observations, and very likely will raise more questions than it answers.

That’s par for the course.

Answering a few questions and raising many more, I mean.

So is discovering something new. New to us, that is. This trilobite’s ‘hyper-compound’ eye last saw the light of day — or dark of the ocean floor — 390,000,000 years ago.

I had fun writing this, and hope you enjoy reading it. Who knew trilobite eyes could be so entrancing?


Welcome to the Devonian Period

Map of Earth in the Early Devonian, 390,000,000 years ago, from Christopher R. Scotese's PALEOMAP Project at scotese.com
(From Christopher R. Scotese, used w/o permission.)
(Earth, 390,000,000 years ago: early or middle Devonian, depending on who’s talking)

Dragons flight's 500 million years of climate change, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission. (2004)Most of Earth’s land was in the southern hemisphere 390,000,000 years ago.

The climate was nice, if you like it warm.

We’re pretty sure that water near tropical beaches was around 86 °F, 30 °C, and didn’t get much cooler near the poles.

Wattieza forests were home to insects that flew and tetrapods that did well to galumph from one bit of water to the next.

Wattieza weren’t ferns, exactly, but they were much like today’s ferns and horsetails.

Don’t bother trying to remember all those names. There won’t, as I’ve said before, be a test on this.

We started calling this era the Devonian about two centuries back, after Roderick Murchison, Adam Sedgwick, Henry De la Beche and George Bellas Greenough didn’t agree about how old a bunch of rocks were.

What matters, sort of, is that Murchison and Sedgwick’s name for a particular slice of Earth’s history has been used ever since: Devonian. They named the era after Devon, British real estate between Cornwall and Somerset.1 Again, don’t bother with those names.

And never mind the plants that aren’t ferns and galumphing tetrapods.

This week I’ll be mostly talking trilobites. Mostly.

Good Times for Trilobites

Major trilobite clades summarized. Figure 6, 'The Evolution of Trilobite Body Patterning,' Nigel C. Hughes, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences (2007)
(From Nigel C. Hughes, used w/o permission.)
(Trilobite diversity: the trilobite family tree, from the Cambrian to the Permian.)

The Ordovican, Silurian and Devonian eras were good times for trilobites. Judging from how diverse the critters were, at any rate.

Agnostida, Asaphida and Ptychopariida trilobites had gone the way of Nineveh and Tyr by the early(ish) Devonian, 390,000,000 years ago. Although those two cities wouldn’t exist until after the most recent glacial melt, and I’m drifting off-topic.

Agnostida may or may not nave been trilobites. There’s ongoing discussion of that, partly because they look funny.

That’s how I see it, at any rate. They look like they’ve got two front ends. Most agnostid species didn’t have eyes.

Which reminds me. Trilobite eyes, in species with eyes, had calcite lenses.2

I’m not sure whether the main question is why trilobite eyes had calcite lenses, or why only Ophiomastix wendtii have calcite lenses today. O. w. is a sort of brittle star.


The Trilobite With a Hyper-Eye

Phacops geesops. The trilobite's eyes have 200 single 'outside' lenses each. Behind each 'outside' lens is a six-facet compound eye.
(From University of Cologne, used w/o permission.)
(Phacops geesops: Devonian trilobite with unique eyes.)

Primordial ‘hyper-eye’ discovered
PD Dr. Brigitte Schoenemann, Press release, University of Cologne (September 30, 2021)

“Trilobites of the suborder Phacopina had a unique eye in which about 200 large lenses in each eye spanned at least six individual facets, each of which in turn formed its own small compound eye / 40-year-old X-ray photographs by amateur paleontologist Wilhelm Stürmer show fossilized eye nerves.

“An international research team has found an eye system in trilobites of the suborder Phacopina from the Devonian (390 million years B.P.) that is unique in the animal kingdom: each of the about 200 lenses of a hyper-facet eye spans a group of six normal compound-eye-facets, forming a compound eye itself. In addition to the hyper-facetted eyes, the researchers, led by zoologist Dr. Brigitte Schoenemann at the University of Cologne’s Institute for Didactics of Biology, identified a structure that they believe to be a local neural network which directly processed the information from this special eye, and an optic nerve that carried information from the eye to the brain. The article, ‘A 390 million-year-old hyper-compound eye in Devonian phacopid trilobites,’ has been published in Scientific Reports….”

This trilobite’s eyes are “hyper” because a compound eye lay behind each outer lens. The inner compound eyes had at least six facets, in one or two rings. These eyes were exactly like nothing else we’ve discovered.

I think Wilhelm Stürmer’s trilobite was a Geesops sparsinodosus, but haven’t confirmed it. That’s one of five species in the Geesops genus.

Like all trilobites, the critters in the Geesops genus had clacite lenses in their eyes. The ones that had eyes, at any rate.3

Look at That!

From 'A 390 million-year-old hyper-compound eye in Devonian phacopid trilobites,' B. Schoenemann et al., figure 4. Structure of the visual unit of phacopid trilobites. Scientific Reports (September 30, 2021)
(From Schoenemann et al., via Scientific Reports, used w/o permission.)
(Trilobite eyes.)

You’re looking at:

  • (o) Schematic drawing of Ampelisca’s eye
  • (p) Schematic drawing of Geesops schlotheimi’s eye.

There’s more at “A 390 million-year-old hyper-compound eye in Devonian phacopid trilobites,” Science Reports. (September 30, 2021)

More than you may need, or want, to know.

Now, back to Wilhelm Stürmer and X-rays.

X-Rays and an Amateur Paleontologist

From 'A 390 million-year-old hyper-compound eye in Devonian phacopid trilobites,' B. Schoenemann et al., figure 3. Structure of the hyper-compound eye of phacopid trilobites. Scientific Reports (September 30, 2021)
(From Schoenemann et al., via Scientific Reports, used w/o permission.)
(More trilobite eyes.)

Stürmer’s day job was running the Siemens X-ray department. Off the clock, he was a paleontologist; doing field work and making x-rays of fossils.

“…To facilitate his palaeontological research, he bought a minibus, installed an X-ray machine within it, and between 1960 and 1986, travelled from quarry to quarry in the Hunsrück, part of the Central German uplands, and visited numerous collectors to investigate the faunas of dark-coloured slates, originally intended to be roofing tiles…”
(“A 390 million-year-old hyper-compound eye in Devonian phacopid trilobites,” B. Schoenemann et al., Scientific Reports (September 30, 2021))

At any rate, Stürmer had spotted and marked fossilized soft tissue in and near trilobite eyes. He said the filaments were probably optic nerves. Or maybe light guides, optical fibers.

But this was the 1970s.

Many professional paleontologists assumed that soft tissue doesn’t fossilize. Just teeth and bones and hard stuff like that. And they assumed that visual systems of animals don’t have optical fibers.

At the time, given the data they had, those were reasonable assumptions.

And, as it turns out, they were wrong.

Then, in the 1980s, scientists found deep-sea crab eyes with optical fibers. Recently, by my standards, scientists have been finding fossilized soft tissues. Sometimes with traces of the original organic matter.

Fossilized soft tissue is very rare, but it does exist.

Anyway, one of Stürmer’s heirs gave zoologist Dr. Brigitte Schoenemann his marked-up x-rays. She found that he’d marked structures that almost certainly include optic nerves.4

A Little History: Geissler Tubes, Lenard Windows and the Royal Society

From 'A 390 million-year-old hyper-compound eye in Devonian phacopid trilobites,' B. Schoenemann et al., figure 3. Structure of the hyper-compound eye of phacopid trilobites; detail highlighting Stürmer's red arrow. Scientific Reports (September 30, 2021)X-rays aren’t new.

No, that’s not quite what I meant.

X-rays have been part of this universe from the start.

An X-ray is electromagnetic radiation with a wavelengths that’s shorter than ultraviolet and longer than a gamma ray. We’ve known about X-rays since about 1895.

That’s when Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen noticed, measured and defined that particular sort of radiation. He had been experimenting with cathode rays from a tube designed by Philipp Lenard.

Lenard had been studying cathode rays, high-speed electrons from a the cathode in a vacuum tube, since 1888.

Scientists had been experimenting with cathode rays since 1857, when Heinrich Geissler invented the Geissler tube.

Assorted researchers tweaked the Geissler tube design between 1869 and 1875. We call one version the Crookes tube, maybe because William Crookes invented it. He’s English.

At any rate, Philipp Lenard invented Lenard Windows, thin metal surfaces that kept air out of cathode ray tubes but let radiation out. That let scientists measure cathode rays outside the not-quite-vacuum tubes.

Lenard also denounced Einstein’s work as “Jewish physics.” I’ll get back to that, briefly.

Röntgen analyzed, defined — and so “discovered” — X-rays in 1895 or thereabouts.

But Geissler and company had noticed them the 1850s.

Then again, William Morgan and Joseph Priestley arguably did the same in the 1780s. The Royal Society got a paper describing Morgan’s research in 1785.5

Now, about Lenard, Einstein and attitudes.


Seeking Truth and Other Options

From NASA/ESA: Galaxy UGC 9391.As I said before, Philipp Lenard denounced Einstein’s work as “Jewish physics.”

Back in 1905, when Lenard got his Nobel Prize and Einstein published his theory of special relativity, physicists had legitimate reasons for testing Einstein’s new ideas.

Testing, not denouncing.

By the 1930s, when Lenard published his “Deutsche Physik,” physicists had decided that general relativity made sense. Although it wasn’t until around the 1960s that they saw it as more than a sort of footnote to Newtonian physics.

Meanwhile, Lenard had asserted that relativity was a “Jewish fraud” and became Chief of Aryan Physics. I am not making that up.

I’m a Christian. And I’ve been talking about scientific stuff.

So, how come I’m not supporting “creation science”6 and condemning paleontology as a Satanic snare?

Basically, it’s because I’m a Catholic and think truth is important.

Even if I hadn’t decided to become a Catholic, I’d value truth. If I had my head on straight, that is. (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2467)

And because I’m a Catholic, I must respect folks who have other faiths; recognizing that, like pretty much everyone else, they’re seeking truth. (Catechism, 839-843)

Then there’s the whole ‘faith and reason, science and religion, don’t mix’ viewpoint.

Again, I’m a Catholic: so I must recognize that although faith isn’t reason, faith and reason get a long fine, or should. And that seeking truth is a good idea. (Catechism, 31-35, 159; “Fides et Ratio;” “Gaudium et Spes,” 36)

Another point, also an important one. Being a Catholic means I must think that being anti-Semitic is a bad idea. Or being anti-anyone, for that matter.

On the other hand, it also means I must be against actions and beliefs that aren’t right. Like genocide, and that’s another topic. (Catechism, 2313)


Next Step: Educated Guesses

Dwergenpaartje's photo of trilobite Phacops rana's schizochroal eye. (October 2011) via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.Figuring out why Phacopina trilobites had ‘hyper-eyes’ would be easier if we could study living Phacopina trilobites.

The last of those critters died about 360,000,000 years ago, give or take a bit; and the last trilobite of any sort that we know of died some 352,000,000 years back.

So studying hyper-eyed trilobites in their natural habitat isn’t an option. Or in laboratories, for that matter.

But scientists can make educated guesses about why they had such complex eyes.

“…The trilobite’s ‘hyper-eye’ may have been an evolutionary adaptation to life in low light conditions, Schoenemann believes. With its highly complex visual apparatus, it may have have been much more sensitive to light than a normal trilobite eye. ‘It is also possible that the individual components of the eye performed different functions, enabling, for example, contrast enhancement or the perception of different colours,’ the biologist said. So far, such an eye has only been found in the trilobite suborder Phacopinae: ‘This is unique in the animal kingdom,’ she concluded. In the course of evolution, this eye system was not continued, since the trilobites of the suborder Phacopinae died out at the end of the Devonian period 360 million years ago.”
(“Primordial ‘hyper-eye’ discovered,” PD Dr. Brigitte Schoenemann, Press release, University of Cologne (September 30, 2021))

The trick will be figuring out how to test those educated guesses. The good news there is that we’ve been learning a great deal about how vision and visual processing works.7

At least, I see that as good news; and I talked about truth and making sense earlier.

We may even learn why these ‘hyper-eyes’ are unique to that one suborder of trilobites.

Finally, the usual link list of stuff I’ve said before:


1 Plants, animals and names:

2 Trilobites, mostly:

3 More trilobites and crystal eyes:

4 Vindicating Stürmer:

5 A radiographical ramble:

6 Science and attitudes:

7 Miscellany:

Posted in Science News | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

“Red Sky at Night Sailors Delight….”

Wednesday’s rain lasted all day. Almost all day. As afternoon turned into evening the sky cleared, and I saw clouds in the east. This photo looks across our back yard.

And now I really ought to get back to writing about trilobites.

Posted in Journal | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Athenian Golden Age: Pericles, Aspasia, and All That

Ah! The Golden Age of Athens!

“Golden age” arguably sounds classier than “the good old days.” But either way, it’s a bygone era that nostalgia says was so very much better than today.

Folks living in a golden age may or may not know what they’ve got. Or they do, and don’t like it. Take the Athenian Golden Age, for example.


The Golden Age of Athens

William R. Shepherd's 1926 'Historical Atlas,' the Achaemenid/Persian Empire, ca. 500 B.C..
(From William R. Shepherd’s 1926 ‘Historical Atlas;’ via the Perry-Castañeda Library Map Collection; U. of Texas, Austin; used w/o permission.)
(The Achaemenid/Persian Empire, around 500 B.C. — before the Delian league liberated the Aegean.)

The Golden Age of Athens began between 508 and 460 B.C. or thereabouts.

It started when Cleisthenes launched Athenian democracy. According to some historians.

Other scholars say it began when the Delian League evicted the Achaemenid Empire from the Aegean.

Or the Athenian Golden Age dawned when Pericles started running the place. Those were good times. He renovated the Acropolis and had the Parthenon built.

Or some maybe it started at some other time. It depends on preferred temporal landmarks.

Folks who say the Athenian Golden Age is the Age of Pericles narrow it down a bit. Their option starts in 495 or 461 B.C. — when Pericles was born. Or, more practically, when he exiled Cimon.

Cimon was an Athenian noble who opposed democracy. As such, he could have made trouble for Pericles.

The ‘Athenian Golden Age as the Age of Pericles’ version’s end is less iffy: 429 B.C. — when Pericles died.

Uncoupling the Golden Age of Athens from Pericles opens the field considerably. I could argue that it kept going until Aristotle died. That was in 330 B.C. or thereabouts.1

But wait! I’ve got more!

Solon, Sappho, Peisistratos and the Panathenaic Stadium

Singinglemon's map of ancient Athens, ca. 430 B.C..
(From Singinglemon, via Wikimedia Commons, Austin used w/o permission.)

I haven’t exhausted definitions of the Athenian Golden Age. Not even close.

Peisistratos arriving in Athens with an Athena stand-in.It arguably started in 580 B.C. — give or take a decade or so. That’s when Solon laid the foundations for Athenian democracy.

Or the Athenian Golden age began around the middle of the sixth century. If that’s my choice, then I’d say never mind Solon.

Peisistratos organized the Hyperakrioi as a political party then.

That was a smart move. His Hyperakrioi outnumbered the other two parties combined.

They were also near the bottom of the economic ladder, so I figure they’d be enthusiastically pro-Peisistratos.

I could say the Hyperakrioi should be called Diakrioi; since they lived in the Diacria hills. “Hyperakrioi” means beyond-the-hill people, roughly. Diakrioi means hill people, so I could also call them hillbillies, and that’s another topic.

These versions assume that Cleisthenes merely picked up where Solon or Peisistratos left off.2

A Sports Venue, Sappho and Uncertainty

M(e)ister Eiskalt's photo of the Panathenaic stadium. (March 2, 2014)
(From M(e)ister Eiskalt, Wikimedia Commons, Austin used w/o permission.)
(The (almost) all-marble Panathenaic Stadium, early 21st century A.D.)

I don’t know why Peisistratos is almost off the radar these days. He’s currently mostly famous for starting the Panathenaic Games.

The Panathenaic Games may or may not be connected with the first official version of the Homeric epics.

Athenian politico Lykourgos built or renovated the Panathenaic Stadium in 330 B.C., give or take a few years.

Herodes Atticus, Athenian statesman or Roman collaborator, depending on viewpoint, refurbished the stadium somewhere around the year 140: in Pentelic marble, the the sort used for parts of the Parthenon.

I gather that the Panathenaic venue is still the only (almost) all-marble stadium in the world.

At any rate, I could pick Peisistratos and the Panathenaic Games premier as launching the Athenian ascendancy.

Or I could ignore Athens and say that the Aegean Golden Age began and ended with Sappho, poet extraordinaire.

She killed herself. Or maybe an angry mob killed her. The suicide version popped up a few centuries after Sappho’s time. The death-by-mob story was current in my youth, but sank without a trace somewhere in the late 20th century.

Getting back to an Athenian focus, there might be a case for saying that the Athenian Golden Age endured until Alexander III of Macedon’s day. Then again, maybe not.3

Pericles in Retrospect

'Perikles hält die Leichenrede,' Pilipp Foltz (1852)
(From Philipp Foltz, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(Philipp Foltz’s “Pericles’ Funeral Oration” (1852))

I’m sure that many folks living in what’s now called the Age of Pericles didn’t feel like they were living in a golden age.

Athenian equivalents of Boston Brahmans might, as individuals, have approve of Periclean reforms. But as a group they were getting disenfranchised. Or as disenfranchised as folks sitting on the socioeconomic ladder’s top rung can be rendered powerless.

Periclean prestige may have depended on an individual’s perception of his domestic status.

We’re pretty sure that Aspasia was the Athenian statesman’s significant other. Whether or not they were married may have depended on who was telling the story. I gather that Aspasia was a top-flight rhetorician and philosopher, brothel keeper and/or hetaera.

“Hetaera” — or “hetaira” — is a job title overlapping artist, dancer, showgirl and hostess.

Assorted academics have said that since descriptions of Aspasia don’t line up, she doesn’t exist. Historically speaking.

I see their point. But I’ve also been paying attention to American politics. If I assumed that descriptions of a public figure must be consistent, then I could argue that America’s last few presidents didn’t exist. Historically speaking.

As I see it, Aspasia and Pericles knew each other well enough to produce Pericles the Younger.

Lucien and Plutarch said Aspasia was smart and attractive. Let’s say that she was smart, articulate and politically influential. And good looking to boot. Small wonder that Athenian traditionalists were upset. And that’s yet another topic.

Pericles’ wife, or courtesan, or girlfriend, wasn’t his only controversial issue.

There’s the way Pericles got control, too.

Ephialtes had been a successful leader of the Athenian democratic movement.

Then someone killed him. With Ephialtes out of the way, Pericles started his three decades of well-documented achievement.4

The Ephialtes Hit: An Unsolved Mystery

Copy of a now-lost Imperial era (1st or 2nd century bust of Aristotle by Lysippos.We still don’t know who killed Ephialtes.

Four decades after the crime, Antiphon (probably Antiphon the orator) wrote that the killer hadn’t been identified

Nine decades after that, about 130 years after the murder, someone wrote a document we call the “Athenian Constitution.” Many scholars figure Aristotle wrote the document. Or maybe one of Aristotle’s students.

Whoever it was, the author fingered Aristodikos of Tanagra. The Aristodikos scenario sometimes assumes that anti-Ephialtes oligarchs planned the murder.

And sometimes Pericles is the chief suspect.

Someone named Idomeneus said Pericles killed Ephialtes, motivated by envy. We know about him mainly because Plutarch brushed off the claim.

Plutarch said that Ephialtes and Pericles were friends and allies, and everyone knows what a great guy Pericles was. According to Plutarch.

Robert W. Wallace says the Ephialtes hit looks like an inside job.

“…Assassination was simple. An attempt to ostracize a political associate and popular figure might have brought discredit or backfired. There is also no other satisfactory explanation for the silence surrounding the incident. Had the radicals not been involved, they could reasonably be expected to have raised a witch-hunt. Ephialtes would have become a martyr for the democratic cause. But there is no trace of this….”
(“Ephialtes and the Areopagos;” Robert w. Wallace; Wadham College, Oxford (February, 1974) via Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies; Duke University)

I’ll grant that the cui bono, who benefits, principle points to Pericles. But as I see it, a high-profile case that remained unsolved after four decades may remain unsolved after more than two dozen centuries.5


Making Sense of the Past

Sanford Robinson Gifford's 'The Parthenon.' (1869)
(From Middlebury College Museum of Art, used w/o permission.)
(The Parthenon, about two and a half millennia after Pericles. (1869))

If this was an ideal world, at least from an historian’s viewpoint, we’d know more about Aspasia, Idomeneus, Sappho and Themistocles.

Themistocles? He was a war hero and populist whose political career crashed and burned in 472 B.C. — or maybe 471 — either way, he’d been called a traitor and booted out of Athens. He died in 459 B.C. of probably-natural causes.

Pericles rehabilitated the Themistocles narrative a few years later and Thucydides said that —

“…Themistocles was a man who exhibited the most indubitable signs of genius; indeed, in this particular he has a claim on our admiration quite extraordinary and unparalleled….”
(“History of the Peloponnesian War,” Thucydides (ca. 410 B.C.) trans by J. M. Dent (1910) via Perseus Digital Library, Tufts University)

— and I’m drifting off-topic. Or maybe not so much.

History

Thomas Cole's 'Aqueduct Near Rome.' (1832)
(From Middlebury College Museum of Art, used w/o permission.)

Depending on context, history is a:

  • Tale or story
  • “Chronological record of significant events (such as those affecting a nation or institution) often including an explanation of their causes”
  • Branch of knowledge that records and explains past events
    (source: Merriam-Webster)

Like pretty much anything else, it’s more complicated than that, but those definitions will do for now.

Back when I might have become a professional historian, someone said that history should be about documents. Written records. Only written records.

The idea was that proper historians should ignore anything found by archaeologists, geologists, or anyone else who wasn’t a proper historian.

I thought it was a daft idea, and still do, since I see “history” as all three of those Merriam-Webster definitions. Pretending that knowledge from other disciplines doesn’t exist would turn history’s search for knowledge of past events into an academic parlor game.

Besides, piecing together the story of Periclean Athens or any other era is hard enough without ignoring physical evidence.6

That’s because humanity’s paper trail is spotty at best. What we call the “Constitution of the Athenians” or “Athenian Constitution,” is a pretty good example.

Fragments

The Aristotelian Constitution of Athens, only extant copy of the nearly complete text. Currently at the British Library
(From The British Library, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(The British Library’s Copy of “Constitution of the Athenians.”)

To begin with, “Constitution of the Athenians” isn’t the Athenian constitution. It’s a book written by Aristotle. Or someone associated with Aristotle.

“Constitution of the Athenians” describes what we call the Areopagite constitution.

The Areopagite constitution wasn’t a document like the Constitution of the United States. It’s our name for part of Athenian history. It ran from the time Themistocles was exiled, to Ephialtes’s reforms.

Aristotle described the Areopagite constitution in “Constitution of the Athenians.” Or, if not Aristotle, then someone else.

Confused? There’s more.

“Constitution of the Athenians” wasn’t the title of that work. That’s mainly because books didn’t have titles until fairly recently. Moreover, making books in today’s codex format didn’t start catching on until around the second century A.D., and I’m drifting off-topic again.7

Epimachus son of Polydeuces and the “Constitution of the Athenians” — We Recycle!

A page of Saint Isidore of Seville's 'Etymologiae,' an 8th century copy. From the Royal Library of Belgium, Brussels.“Constitution of the Athenians” isn’t in the “Corpus Aristotelicum.”

That’s the collected works of Aristotle, as recovered in Medieval Europe. We have folks like St. Isidore of Seville to thank for backing up the ancient world’s data. I talked about that a couple weeks back.

Anyway, part of the “Athenian Constitution” turned up in the late 19th century.

In a garbage dump. Archaeologists had been rummaging through an ancient scrapyard near where Oxyrhynchus is now. They found bits and pieces of documents from between the third century B.C. to seventh century A.D. — Including part of Aristotle’s “Athenian Constitution.”

Sir Ernest Budge bought another copy of the “Athenian Constitution” during his 1889-90 visit(s) to Egypt.

Budge’s copy is now in the British Museum. It’s nearly complete. Partly, I’m guessing, because someone used the codex it was in for business records.

Here’s how that happened.

Didymus son of Aspasius had recycled an old book, repurposing its papyrus to keep farm accounts on an estate near Hermopolis. Or maybe some other place.

Didymus worked for Epimachus son of Polydeuces. I’m pretty sure neither of them realized how valuable the backside of their records would be, two millennia later.8

Athens, America, Collars and Class

Napoleon Vier's map of Ancient Athens.
(From Napoleon Vier, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(Athens, Piraeus, Phalerum and defensive walls. (fifth and fourth centuries B.C.))

Detail of John Mahowald's photo, Sibley State Park, Minnesota. (2007)Picturing Pericles as championing the cause of Athenian blue-collar workers isn’t entirely wrong.

But it’s not entirely accurate, either.

Backing up a bit: American blue-collar workers use their hands on the job. They’re unskilled or skilled labor and, on average, have less income and status than the average white-collar worker.

But an American with a blue-collar job could make more money than a white-collar worker.

And figurative collar colors might or might not affect their comparative social status.

Our white-collar workers use their hands, too. But they usually have higher status and often work at a desk. Come to think of it, a high-level white-collar worker could tell someone else to write memos, use the telephone and perform other manual tasks.

I’m not sure what color the memo-writer’s collar would be. Figuratively speaking.

Sometimes we subdivide ourselves into lower, middle or upper class.

I haven’t seen bloated plutocrat, bourgeoisie, and oppressed proletariat used as identifiers for decades.9 Can’t say that I miss those labels.

My household is middle or lower class, depending on which definition I use. Living in one of a largely-urban country’s rural areas complicates things.

Athenian society in the Periclean Age wasn’t like 21st century America.

But it wasn’t simpler.

Maybe a third of Athenians were in citizen families. The rest were resident foreigners or slaves. Women, children and adult men who hadn’t completed military training couldn’t vote, no matter what family they were in.10


Good Times and Rose-Colored Recollections

Cornè's 'Landing of the Pilgrims.' (ca. 1803-1807)
(From Michele Felice Cornè, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)

So, just how golden was the Age of Pericles?

I figure it was good times for Aspasia and Pericles. When they weren’t dodging oratorical fewmets, at any rate. For Cimon and his cronies, arguably not so much.

Periclean reforms improved conditions for at least some Athenian non-aristocrats.

But slaves were still slaves. And that’s not good. Ever. (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2414)

I also figure Athenians felt better about the Pericles administration after it was over. Particularly while, say, the pro-Spartan Thirty Tyrants were running the the place.11

We Can Do Better

Boston's public notice, banning Christmas. (1659)I strongly suspect that many eras look better in 20-20 hindsight.

Like America’s Pilgrim Fathers, “whose stern impassioned stress” brought faith and freedom to this fair land. And who later criminalized Christmas.12

I’m also pretty sure that no era is as good as rose-colored recollections suggest.

But I think there’s some wisdom in remembering good times. And recognizing that we both could have done better, and can do better.

Finally, the Age of Pericles wasn’t our last ‘Golden Age.’ And that’s yet again another topic, for another day.

More (or less) of the same thing:


1 Athens, the Acropolis, Aristotle and the Achaemenid Empire — a nowhere-near-comprehensive look:

2 A couple guys and ancient populism:

3 Games, politics, a poet and a stadium:

4 High society:

5 The Ephilates Hit, still unsolved:

6 Documenting humanity’s story:

7 Documents, procedures and names:

8 Documents found in a trashheap:

  • Wikipedia
  • British Library
    • Papyrus 131 (1): Scholia on Callimachus’ Aetia (P. Lond. Lit. 181, TM 59363, LDAB 462, MP3 197). Three columns at the beginning of the roll, the first and the third with only a few lines
    • Papyrus 131

9 Economics, social status and the usual politics:

10 One slice through life in ancient Athens:

11 Not-so-good times after Pericles:

12 One slice of America’s history:

Posted in Golden Ages, Series | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Just for Fun: Where is Otis?

While looking for a parking space in the Walmart lot, I ran into — no, that’s not right. I noticed a hand-painted trailer with “WhereIsOtis.blog” emblazoned on the back. I pulled into an empty parking space, and started looking for something to write with.

By happy coincidence, the trailer’s owner returned then. We had a (fairly) short talk. With me, any talk tends to be less terse than need be, and that’s another topic.

At any rate, I learned that she and Otis, her dog, were on an open-ended road trip; and that she’s documenting the trip from Otis’ viewpoint. Otis’s adventure dog blog started on December 13, 2019 — and may bring a smile your way:

Posted in Journal | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Off Schedule, and Loving It

I re-organized some of A Catholic Citizen in America’s pages today, and — I hope — made the navigation menus more useful. In the process, I removed some text that’d been cluttering one page. On the off-chance that you’re interested, here it is:


Technical issues in March, 2018, put me off my ‘science news every Friday’ schedule.

After my son resolved them, going back to the routine was an option. Instead, I decided to start work on several ‘back burner’ projects; including a book that’s been on my ‘really should do this’ list for some time:

I’ll also be posting something new whenever there’s something ready. Some posts will be in the usual being Catholic and science news categories, some in not-so-usual categories like being a citizen or being an artist. The one I finished first, “Spirit Photographs,” wouldn’t fit in existing categories, so I made a new one: discursive detours.

Posted in Being a Writer, Journal | Tagged , | Leave a comment