Weather map at 10:30 p.m. Sunday night. (May 12, 2024)
That’s what the weather map showed last night: frost advisories for Minnesota’s northern counties, air quality alerts over the rest of the state.
The air quality alert is still in effect for my part of the state and points south. Which means I’ll be staying inside until after noon. As the National Weather Service put it:
“…A band of very heavy smoke from wildfires in northeast British Columbia has moved into northern Minnesota and will sweep south across the state on Sunday behind a cold front. The smoke will reach central Minnesota by Sunday afternoon and southern Minnesota by Sunday evening….” (National Weather Service, May 12, 2024)
An ‘up’ side is that my part of the state no longer has drought conditions. For now, at any rate. There’s some truth to this ‘Minnesota’ joke: we don’t have climate, we have weather.
For some reason, I expected Monday’s Starliner launch to go ahead on schedule.
It didn’t, which is probably a good thing. But the delay, and staying up far later than I usually do, waiting for a news conference that I slept through anyway —
The long and the short of it is that, instead of focusing on the Starliner spacecraft this week, I decided to start talking about Boeing’s reputation, SpaceX, the shift to commercial space travel and exploration; and see where that led me.
As usual, I’ve made a list of links to this week’s headings: so feel free to skip ahead to whatever looks most interesting. Or go get a cup of coffee, take a walk, whatever. This post should still be around when you get back.
SpaceX Dragon, Working Since 2010; Boeing Starliner, …
Inside the Crew Dragon: SpaceX Demo-2. (2020)
A few decades back, NASA began edging toward giving development and service contracts with defined limits.
Some of these contracts involved the Commercial Crew Program (CCP). The idea, in part, was that a company would develop and operate (partly) reusable spacecraft for the surface to low Earth orbit passenger run.
That brings me to the Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (CCtCap). NASA wanted an operator for the Earth-ISS passenger run.
Since Boeing had developed the Space Shuttle and worked on the International Space Station (ISS), they’d obviously get the job. They had the engineers, the experience, and the reputation as a top-rate aerospace firm.
In 2014, Boeing got almost two-thirds of the CCtCap’s budget: $4,200,000,000.
The remainder went to some startup called SpaceX. They’d already been handling cargo runs to low Earth orbit.
From 2010 to 2020, the SpaceX Dragon 1 cargo spacecraft flew 23 missions.
Dragon 2 has a more complicated story. So far, Cargo Dragon has had nine missions to the ISS, with six more planned. Crew Dragon’s test flights ended in August of 2020.
Since then, Crew Dragon 2 has flown 10 missions for a mix of government and private customers: 11, counting the one that’s still docked at the ISS.
Meanwhile, Boeing’s Starliner has made two uncrewed orbital test flights. They weren’t entirely flawless, but the Starliner came back intact both times.1
Third Starliner Orbital Test Flight, the First With Astronauts
Screenshots from “NASA’s Boeing Starliner Crew Flight Test Launch”, NASA, YouTube. (May 6, 2024)
Monday’s planned Boeing/NASA Starliner test flight got rescheduled: tentatively for Friday, May 10, then — I’ll get to that.
The problem, I gather, was a noisy oxygen relief valve on the launch vehicle’s second stage: the thing was chattering/buzzing/fluttering at about 40 cycles per second.
“… ‘What you would typically do is activate [a] solenoid that forces the valve closed, cycling the valve, if you will … and it almost always stops,’ said Tory Bruno, CEO of United Launch Alliance. ‘Once we had the crew off, we cycled the valve, and it stopped buzzing.
“‘If this were a satellite (launch), that is our standard procedure, and the satellite would already be in orbit. But that changes the state of the fueled Centaur, and we don’t do that when people are present. And so our flight rules called for us to scrub and to take the crew off before we cycled that valve.’
Since the engineers didn’t have a counter wired to that valve, they went over accelerometer data from the second stage to see how many times it cycled.
If the valve had been going through the full open-close cycle 40 times a second, then it’d be close to its 200,000-cycle safe limit.
On the other hand, if the valve was still comfortably inside its cycle limits, the Starliner could have taken off on Friday.
That was the situation early Tuesday morning. Later that day, someone with NASA said that the Boeing Starliner will take off “no earlier than 6:16 p.m. EDT Friday, May 17” .The Atlas V has been hauled back to the hanger for repairs.2
I’m glad the folks in charge decided that caution makes sense.
“Ad Astra Per Aspera”: “To the Stars Through Difficulties”
One of Otto Lilienthal’s gliding experiments. (1894)
Since I’m talking about folks working toward a goal, this quote seemed appropriate:
“We are getting closer to this goal. When we will reach it, I do not know.” (Otto Lilienthal, Letter to Moritz von Egidy (c. January 1894) Wikiquote)
That Wikiquote entry included a link to “Original German text online“. I learned that Otto Lilienthal wasn’t just talking about heavier-than-air flight.
Here’s the gist of what he wrote, along with context; first in German and then English.
“…Mit Begeisterung habe ich oft Ihren Worten gelauscht, in denen Sie die Grenzen nicht als Trennung, sondern als die Verbindung der Länder bezeichneten….
“…Der freie, unbeschränkte Flug des Menschen, für dessen Verwirklichung jetzt zahlreiche Techniker in allen Kulturstaaten ihr Bestes einsetzen, kann hierin Wandel schaffen und würde von tief einschneidender Wirkung auf alle unsere Zustände sein.…
“…und das zwingende Bedürfnis, die Streitigkeiten der Nationen auf andere Weise zu schlichten als den blutigen Kämpfen um die imaginär gewordenen Grenzen, würde uns den ewigen Frieden verschaffen.
“Wir nähern uns diesem Ziele. Wann wir es ganz erreichen, weiß ich nicht. Das Schärflein, was ich hierzu beigetragen habe, finden Sie in den Anlagen. Ich werde froh sein, wenn ich einen kleinen realen Beitrag liefern kann zu den hohen und idealen Kulturaufgaben, welche Sie verfolgen.
Lilienthal’s Letter, a Lunar Plaque, and a Work in Progress
Bear with me. This ties in with Lilienthal’s “ewigen Frieden”, “eternal peace”.
A plaque on the Apollo 11 lander reads “…We came in peace for all mankind”.
More than a half-century later, world peace is prominent by its absence. But I think it’s still a good idea. And a worthy goal.
Now, back to Otto Lilienthal’s interest in heavier-than-air flight.
“…I have often listened with enthusiasm to your words in which you described borders not as a separation but as a connection between countries….
“…The free, unrestricted flight of man, for the realization of which numerous technicians in all civilized countries are now doing their best, can bring about change in this regard and would have a profound effect on all our conditions.…
“…and the compelling need to settle the disputes of nations in a way other than the bloody battles over the imaginary borders would bring us eternal peace.
“We are approaching this goal. I do not know when we will fully achieve it. The small contribution I have made to this can be found in the appendices. I will be happy if I can make a small, real contribution to the high and ideal cultural tasks that you are pursuing.
“Yours sincerely, Otto Lilienthal” Otto Lilienthal’s letter to Moritz von Egidy in Berlin (ca. 1894) Trans. by Google Translate [emphasis mine]
Achieving world peace through flying machines didn’t happen. Or hasn’t happened yet, at any rate.
In 1903, the Wright brothers flew a controllable powered heavier-than-air device 120 feet.
By the end of 1914, P. E. Fansler and Thomas W. Benoist — don’t bother remembering those names, there won’t be a test — had established the St. Petersburg-Tampa Airboat Line as the world’s first commercial passenger airline.
Meanwhile, over in Europe, an assassination, assumptions — and a brilliantly-planned set of interlocking treaties which would surely guarantee peace — started World War I.
Maybe, if someone had flown a powered glider in 1893, we’d have had commercial airlines in 1904, and would have been celebrating the first World Peace Day in 1914. Or maybe not.
I’m just glad nobody’s blamed WWI on the Wright brothers and commercial airlines. That I know of. Which would be crazy: but what I see in headlines — is another topic.
Finally, about Otto Lilienthal and his glider: something went wrong during his fourth test flight of August 9, 1896. His glider crashed.
About 36 hours later, despite treatment in Stölln and Berlin, he died. Simulations and testing have shown that his glider can be flown safely.3
World peace? We’re still working on that.
Apollo 1: Briefly
Gus Grissom, Ed White II, Roger Chaffee: crew of Apollo 1. Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex.
If everything had gone well, Apollo 1 would have been a low Earth orbit test of the Apollo command and service module (CSM).
The crew said the cabin’s fittings included overly much flammable nylon and Velcro.
The program manager agreed, told his staff that the combustibles should go, but didn’t personally follow up on that detail.
Can’t say that I blame him. The CSM was the most biggest and most complex crewed spacecraft to date.
And the design kept getting changed, improved. By August, 26, 1966, more than 600 engineering change orders were in process or pending.
Then, on the afternoon of January 27, 1967, during a ground test to see whether the command module would operate normally on (simulated) internal power, a fire started. Inside the cabin. In a 100% oxygen atmosphere. At full sea level pressure.
A few extremely unpleasant minutes later, Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger B. Chaffee, were dead.
The usual Congressional committee investigations happened. Engineers worked over their records and the burned-out husk of the Apollo 1 command module. They learned what went wrong, and this time around — there wasn’t another fire.
Apollo 13’s crew made it back to Earth, and that’s yet another topic.4
Remembering the Space Shuttle Fleet
Remembering the Challenger and Columbia Space Shuttles. Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex.
First, the good news.
Discovery, Atlantis, and Endeavour completed their missions and ended up at the California Science Center, the Smithsonian’s display at the Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center, and the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex.
Now the bad news.
Two of the 135 Space Shuttle missions ended in disaster.
If 1.5% of a commercial airline’s flights crashed, killing everyone aboard — even if government agencies didn’t shut them down, passengers would stay away in droves.
But the Space Shuttle program was a government operation. And, perhaps more to the point, the fleet — Challenger, Columbia, Discovery, Atlantis, and Endeavour — were the first of their kind.
Folks had been thinking about spaceplanes at least since Max Valier’s day.
But nobody had tried, successfully, building and flying the things. Not for regular cargo and passenger runs.5
I’m still angry about what looks like world-class lack of common sense during the hours before Challenger exploded.
But I’ve never been a bureaucrat, or an executive: or an engineer trying to educate either sort of higher-up. I’ve been customer support for educational software, and that’s almost another topic.
Ending this section with good news, we learned from both the Challenger and Columbia disasters: and, perhaps remarkably, may be applying some of that hard-won knowledge.
Reputation and Realities
Boeing’s CST-100 Starliner approaching the ISS during Orbital Flight Test-2 (May 2022)
I suspect Boeing’s Starliner and Lockheed Martin’s Orion look like scaled-up versions of the Apollo command module because folks have learned how tricky spaceplane design is.
And because, during this century’s first decade, NASA started thinking of space exploration from a commercial viewpoint.6 Or trying to. I think it’s (basically) a good idea: and something I won’t try discussing this week. Not in any detail.
I will, however, talk about why I’m not terrified about test pilots risking their lives in a Boeing vehicle.
Keeping Up With the Times: Or Not
Boeing had a reputation as a top-rate aerospace firm.
So how come we’ve got jokes about which piece of the airliner falls off this time, and (some) passengers who won’t fly on a particular Boeing airliner?
Instead of diving down rabbit holes in a possibly-frustrating effort to ferret out — good grief. Metaphors, mixed nuts, election-year mania and staying up too late Monday night.
I’ll settle for sharing excerpts from recent articles, with a disclaimer or two.
First, a disclaimer. I do read the occasional Ars Technica article, but I don’t actually know much about the outfit.
They’ve got a viewpoint, like everyone else. That said, I’ve noticed no wild zeal for defending democracy against Texans, defeating the Antichrist in my country’s looming election, or other red flags.
On the other hand, I haven’t verified assertions made in this article. Or the next two. I’m just some guy living in central Minnesota, and corporate nitwittery isn’t among my favorite subjects.
“…Boeing’s space division had never won a large fixed-price contract. Its leaders were used to operating in a cost-plus environment, in which Boeing could bill the government for all of its expenses and earn a fee. Cost overruns and delays were not the company’s problem—they were NASA’s. Now Boeing had to deliver a flyable spacecraft for a firm, fixed price.…
“…So Boeing faced financial pressure from the beginning. At the same time, it was confronting major technical challenges. Building a human spacecraft is very difficult. Some of the biggest hurdles would be flight software and propulsion….
“…There was no single flight software team at Boeing. The responsibilities were spread out. A team at Kennedy Space Center in Florida handled the ground systems software, which kept Starliner healthy during ground tests and the countdown until the final minutes before liftoff. Separately, a team at Boeing’s facilities in Houston near Johnson Space Center managed the flight software for when the vehicle took off….” [emphasis mine]
“…no single flight software team…” is an example of something that’d take considerable researching before I could say that it’s either no problem, or a reason why Boeing shouldn’t be building spacecraft. Or airliners.
On the one hand, having two teams might keep both from getting overwhelmed.
Or it might a paranoid senior executive’s way to keep them busy fighting each other. And presumably unaware that the executive can’t type, let alone code.
Much more likely, the situation would be more complex.
“…All of Boeing’s struggles with Starliner played out against a much larger backdrop of the company’s misfortunes with its aviation business. Most notably, in October 2018 and March 2019, two crashes of the company’s relatively new jet, the 737 MAX 8, killed 346 people. The jets were grounded for many months.
“The institutional failures that led to these twin tragedies are well explained in a book by Peter Robison, ‘Flying Blind’. Robison covered Boeing as a reporter during its merger with McDonnell Douglas a quarter of a century ago and described how countless trends since then—stock buybacks, a focus on profits over research and development, importing leadership from McDonnell Douglas, moving away from engineers in key positions to MBAs, and much more led to Boeing’s downfall….” (“The surprise is not that Boeing lost commercial crew but that it finished at all” , Eric Berger, (May 6, 2024)) [emphasis mine]
Peter Robison’s assessment could be spot-on accurate and fact-based, or not. I don’t know.
I do know that a panel blew off a Boeing 737 MAX 9 on January 5 of this year.
By what feels like a miracle, nobody died.
Nobody flying a Boeing 737, that is.
Popped Panel, Dead Whistleblowers: Embarrassing
Again, nobody died when Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 popped a panel.
On the other hand, two of 12, or maybe 10, Boeing ‘whistleblowers’ stopped living rather abruptly this year: one by an alleged self-inflicted wound, another from a fast-moving staph/pneumonia infection.
That seems like a high death rate for such a small group: but that’s just my impression. I’ve also been impressed by the low profile those two deaths have had in American news.
“After death of Joshua Dean & John Barnett, their lawyers are concerned about the possibility that around 10 more Boeing whistleblowers may suffer the same fate….
“…The sudden demise of 45-year-old Dean was announced on May 30, less than two months after Barnett’s. While Dean worked for Spirit AeroSystems, a major sub contractor in the manufacturing of 737 Max airliners, Barnett was employed as production-quality manager of 787 Boeing.…
“…Barnett, according to police, died from apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound on March 9. He was found dead in the South Carolina hotel’s hotel parking lot after he failed to show up for the second part of his testimony for a bombshell lawsuit against the Boeing….” [emphasis mine]
“A Kansas man is now the second whistleblower linked to Boeing to die in the last two months.
“The family of 45-year-old Joshua Dean says he died April 30.
“He had a staph infection that quickly developed into pneumonia.
“Dean, a former quality auditor at Boeing supplier Spirit AeroSystems, was reportedly among the first to sound the alarm about potentially dangerous defects with the 737 Max.
“In March, a former Boeing manager who raised safety questions about the aircraft maker was found dead from what appeared to be a self-inflicted gunshot wound.
“John Barnett, 62, was a longtime Boeing employee and worked as a quality-control manager before he retired in 2017. In the years after that, he shared his concerns with journalists….” [emphasis mine]
I take what I see in the news with a grain of salt. And an appreciation for the deadline pressure reporters work with.
Oddly enough, the only article I found, after a quick search, discussing in depth the awkward detail of two whistleblowers dying after becoming irksome was in a Delhi-based newspaper.
I can hardly blame editors on the other side of the planet taking note of a foreign SNAFU.
Maybe American editors are developing a sense of decorum. Maybe election-year hissing and spitting drowns out almost everything else. Or maybe something completely different.
I just don’t know.
Small wonder, I suppose, that NASA video coverage of Monday’s planned Starliner launch focused so much on safety concerns.
I’m forgetting something.
SpaceX Cargo & Crew Dragon. Boeing Starliner. Otto Lilienthal. Apollo 1. The Challenger and Columbia Space Shuttle disasters. Embarrassingly dead whistleblowers. Right.
I’d be considerably more concerned about the life expectancy of Boeing Crew Flight Test astronauts, if Boeing didn’t have three main divisions:7
Commercial Airplanes
Defense, Space & Security
Global Services
I can hope that apparent problems in Boeing Commercial Airplanes haven’t leaked into Defense, Space & Security. And that whoever’s in charge of the Defense, Space & Security division realizes that launching a defective spaceship might be bad for business.
Getting Starliner Into Orbit: It’s Complicated
As if getting passenger service to low Earth orbit wasn’t already complicated.
Although Boeing makes the Starliner spacecraft, it’s a United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V that puts Starliner in orbit.
ULA is a Lockheed Martin Space-Boeing Defense, Space & Security joint venture.
Lockheed Martin began with the merger of Lockheed Corporation and Martin Marietta. Martin Marietta got started when American-Marietta Corporation and the Glen L. Martin Company merged.
American-Marietta Corporation — no, that’s as far back as I’ll go. American corporate lineages remind me of those ‘begat’ lists in the Old Testament, and that’s yet again another topic.
The point of those paragraphs is that, although Boeing makes the Starliner spacecraft, and ULA makes the Atlas V launch vehicle; ULA is a Lockheed-Martin-Boeing joint venture.
So Boeing is somewhat involved with both the spacecraft and the launch vehicle.
Lockheed-Martin is also part of the International Launch Services joint venture; along with Energia, and Khrunichev State Research and Production Space Center.
I almost forgot. Although the Atlas V second stage, the one with the dubious valve, is a ULA Centaur with an Aerojet Rocketdyne engine — made by American companies — the Atlas V first stage engine is an NPO Energomash RD-180: made in Russia.8
Like I said, complicated.
And with details that might make a conspiracy theory buff giddy.
Spacecraft Cabins: Mostly Starliner
Boeing Starliner: flexible cabin design for crew and cargo.
The only part of the Starliner spacecraft that comes back for another flight is the crew module.
The service module’s solar cells provide power for the crew module while the spacecraft is in orbit. Four Rocketdyne RS-88 engines in the service module would push the command and service modules away from the launch vehicle if something goes wrong on the way up.
And the service module is strictly single-use, along with the Atlas V launch vehicle. Not an ideal situation, but so far nobody’s come up with a fully reusable launch system. Not on this scale.
We have, however, developed a-one-size-fits-all-docking system. Several, actually, and that’s something I’ll leave for another day.9
One more thing.
I’d wondered about “Starliner” being the name of Boeing’s spacecraft.
The L-1649 Starliner was Lockheed’s last model in their Constellation line of airliners, so Boeing’s “Starliner” name seemed like a possible trademark issue.
But since Boeing and Lockheed’s current iteration are cooperating with this launch service, it’s probably an issue that isn’t. And in any case, it wouldn’t be my problem.
That was Then —
Apollo 11 Command Module Columbia, at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. (2013)
The Apollo 11 command module had a lot of switches, readouts, and — left-center in this photo — translation and attitude controls. Keep this photo in mind when reading about “traditional hand controls and switches”, below.
For a better, or at any rate different, look inside the Apollo 11 command module, I recommend the Smithsonian’s online display.
Parts of it, like the ‘orbit, pan, zoom’ interactive model, may take time to load. And, for me, wouldn’t do anything except ‘orbit’. Cool, though.
— This is (Mostly) Now
Boeing’s Starliner: LED lighting and tablet tech. (2013)Bob Hines and Kjell Lindgren (left) and “Rosie the Rocketeer” in Boeing’s Starliner. (2022)
The outside of Boeing’s Starliner looks like the old Apollo command module. And the new Lockheed Martin Orion.
The inside looks a lot like the SpaceX Dragon to me. Bear in mind that I haven’t seen all that many photos or videos taken inside either.
I suspect part of the explanation is that the Apollo command module was designed in the 1960s, while both Dragon and Starliner are 21st century spacecraft.
I’d planned on doing a compare & contrast section about Boeing Starliner, SpaceX Crew Dragon, and the Apollo CSM. Then I realized how much work that would be, and decided on doing a little copy-and-paste instead; from 2024, 2022, and 2013.
“Both companies’ capsules are designed to be autonomous and reusable. This Starliner is the same one that made the first test flight in 2019. … Starliner has traditional hand controls and switches alongside touchscreens and, according to the astronauts, is more like NASA’s Orion capsules for moon missions….”
“From the outside, Boeing’s new spacecraft mimics the Apollo-era capsules from back in the day. The interior, however, is all about the future….
…[the Starliner cabin] features tablet technology and the same blue LED lighting found in Boeing’s newer commercial aircraft like the Dreamliner.
“‘It’s an upgrade,’ said NASA astronauts [!] Serena Aunon in the video below. ‘It’s an American vehicle — of course it’s an upgrade.’…”
I don’t know where Starliner’s “traditional hand controls and switches” are. Maybe on the wall that’s behind the camera in that 2022 photo.
Speaking of which, calling “Rosie the Rocketeer” an “anthropometric test device” sounds a lot cooler than “crash test dummy”.10 There’s a whole set of subjects there, including the history of simulators. But again: that’s for another time.
Wrapping up this week’s post, I’ll given an educated guess about why Boeing apparently got used to operating in a cost-plus environment.
And why it almost made sense.
A Little History: Boeing, the Great Depression, Good Times —
(Ambrosia’s “Holdin’ on to Yesterday” (1975) came to mind while writing this.)
William E. Boeing’s Pacific Aero Products Company got started in 1916.
Like pretty much everything else, it’s complicated: but by 1931, the Boeing Airplane Company had both survived the Great Depression and become a major aircraft manufacturer.
That’s an impressive achievement.
Periodization, the way historians divvy up humanity’s story into manageable chunks: is still another topic. I’ve talked about it before.
These days, we call the years from 1939 to 1945 World War II.
Then came the Post-World War II Era. A few centuries from now we’ll probably have new divisions and labels. We already do, actually.
I was born during the Truman administration, so I remember “the good old days”. I don’t yearn for them — my memory’s too good — but I can understand why they’ve acquired a rosy hue.
The fictional Cleaver family, in “Leave it to Beaver”, was just that: fictional.
But from the mid-1940s to the early 1970s, a remarkable number of folks — not just Americans — were enjoying a measure of prosperity.
One of the monikers for that era is the “Golden Age of Capitalism”, and it’s been blamed for quite a few things.11
While those good times lasted, staying on a tight budget wasn’t a high priority for many: including, apparently, the United States government.
Between economic good times, and high-pressure situations we call the Cold War and Space Race, I can see how giving Boeing and others money until their jobs got done might seem reasonable.
As for Boeing executives apparently not noticing that we’re no longer the 1970s, I suspect that corporate habits are as hard to break as personal habits. And that the same goes for assumptions about circumstances and rules we live with.
— And the Skunk Works
Skunk Works at work: Linear Aerospike SR-71 Experiment (LASRE). (1998)
Economic and environmental determinism are both debatable and debated as being more than ideas that look good on paper.
I don’t think either is a good explanation for how the same circumstances resulted in both Boeing’s current embarrassments and the Skunk Works.12
Maybe someday I’ll talk more about Lockheed Martin’s Skunk Works. But not today.
Partly because it’s slightly off-topic, partly because I wasn’t finding much specific information about the Skunk Works. That’s understandable, considering the sort of work they do. And how they do it.
So I’ll repeat what’s basically scuttlebutt from trade magazines: back when I had access to such things.
Somehow — there’s more than one story about how the Skunk Works began — the folks in charge at Lockheed decided that they should let a few really good engineers do their jobs.
The idea was that a Lockheed client would define what they wanted: specifically, in detail. Then, with a defined goal, conditions, and budget, the engineers would get to work.
And deliver the product, as specified. Even if the client, halfway through, decided that what they really wanted was faster, shorter, heavier, or whatever.
That, and focusing more on results than on composing memos and organizing staff meetings, was and apparently still is a radical departure from business as usual.
Somehow, I do not miss having failed to experience a successful career in corporate America.
Folks have a great many ways of dealing with grief and loss.
For example, folks at the hospital took a photo of our youngest daughter. She died shortly before birth. That photo’s on an ‘in loving memory of’ memorial card — I think that’s what it’s called — that’s tucked into the corner of our wedding picture.
Anyway: that card, the wedding picture, and photos of our four surviving children, hang on a wall near my desk. I like having a few visual reminders around.
Some folks apparently prefer more active, make that interactive, reminders. Like what I saw in my news feed this morning:
“When Ana Schultz, a 25-year-old from Rock Falls, Illinois, misses her husband Kyle, who passed away in February 2023, she asks him for cooking advice….
“…Or rather, his likeness in the form of an AI avatar does.
“‘He was the chef in the family, so I customized My AI to look like him and gave it Kyle’s name,’ said Schultz, who lives with their two young children. ‘Now when I need help with meal ideas, I just ask him. It’s a silly little thing I use to help me feel like he’s still with me in the kitchen.’…
“…The concept isn’t entirely new. People have wanted to reconnect with deceased loved ones for centuries, whether they’ve visited mediums and spiritualists or leaned on services that preserve their memory. But what’s new now is that AI can make those loved ones say or do things they never said or did in life, raising both ethical concerns and questions around whether this helps or hinders the grieving process….”
Particularly since Ana recognizes her AI avatar as “a silly little thing”, I don’t see her idea as a bad one. I wouldn’t take that option, but that’s because I’m me: and that’s several other topics.
The CNN piece discusses, very briefly, ethical issues, the psychology of grief, and what my culture calls privacy concerns.
I’ve got another topic lined up for this week, so I won’t be talking about why Saul’s Endor gambit was a really bad idea. (1 Samuel 28:3–19)
Given human nature — which isn’t all bad, and that’s another topic — and how we sometimes respond to grief; I figure it’s only a matter of time before someone monetizes chatbot mediums.
Then maybe I’ll talk about table tapping, tambourines, and making sense anyway.
Biennale Arte 2024: Venice. (April 20 – November 24, 2024)
Pope Francis visited the Vatican’s exhibits at an international art show last Sunday.
So this week I’ll talk about the Venice Biennale, why “With My Eyes” doesn’t horrify me, share a few quotes, and show pictures from “Con i miei occhi”.
Venice Biennale Arte 2024: Propriety, Changes, and Context
“Stranieri Ovunque”, “Foreigners Everywhere”: Biennale Arte 2024.
After skimming the English translation of what Pope Francis had said, I checked into the Venice Biennale.
Turns out that it’s a cultural exhibition Venice has hosted yearly since 1895. Or since 1880, if you count the Venice Biennale of Architecture. Almost yearly. World Wars I and II caused gaps, and so did the COVID-19 pandemic.
The art, music, and other creative displays have been getting increasingly international: and deliberately inclusive, although I didn’t find that word in the Venice Biennale English-language introductions.
Biennale Arte 2024
Introduction by Pietrangelo Buttafuoco President of La Biennale di Venezia “…This edition of the Biennale Arte features both a contemporary and a historical nucleus, with a large presence of Italian artists from the 20th-century diaspora, … For the first time, an indigenous Amazonian art collective — MAHKU (Movimento dos Artistas Huni Kuin) — also takes centre stage, with a large-scale work on the facade of the Central Pavilion. Seven hundred square metres of hallucinatory visions inspired by sacred ayahuasca-based rituals, experiences mirrored by those – no less sacred – that the Old Continent has experimented through, for example, Ernst Jünger’s Annäherungen…”
Introduction by Adriano Pedrosa Curator of the 60th International Art Exhibition “…Nucleo Storico” (“Historical Core”) … “The Italian stranieri, the Portuguese estrangeiro, the French étranger, … the strange that is also familiar, within, deep down side. According to the American Heritage and the Oxford Dictionaries, the first meaning of the word queer is strange, and thus the Exhibition unfolds and focuses on the production of other related subjects: the queer artist, who has moved within different sexualities and genders, often being persecuted or outlawed; the outsider artist, who is located at the margins of the art world, much like the self-taught artist, the folk artist and the artista popular; as well as the indigenous artist, frequently treated as a foreigner in his or her own land….” [emphasis from Adriano Pedrosa’s text]
There’s ample opportunity for pearl-clutching here: like Adriano Pedrosa’s “queer artist” instead of LGBT of LGBTI+. Or, since “queer” may no longer be verboten, not inclusively using LGBTQ+ or LGBTIQA+.
It’s so hard to keep up with what’s proper and what’s not, which is one reason I often stick with established and bookish terminology. When discussing hot-button topics, that is.
Then there’s Pietrangelo Buttafuoco’s reference to ayahuasca.
I gather that it’s “a South American psychoactive brew”, or “a plant-based psychedelic”.
As far as I can tell, ayahuasca is a sort of South American moonshine, except that instead of being a depressant, ayahuasca acts as a stimulant.
It may be hallucinogenic, too; increasing activity in the visual cortex while triggering access to memories.1
Plentiful Protest Possibilities
I’ve wondered how coffee would get classified, if it hadn’t become thoroughly embedded in my culture by the time gems like “Reefer Madness” and “The Devil’s Weed” hit the silver screen.
And that’s another topic.
Or maybe not so much.
I’d expected howls of anguish over Pope Francis visiting the Venice Biennale, and artwork at the Holy See’s Pavillion: which is inside the Giudecca Women’s Prison. But so far I’ve seen nothing in my news feed’s op-eds, or on social media.
Maybe that’s because I don’t actively seek commentary from assorted lunatic fringes.
Or maybe it’s because my country’s election-year uproar is already at around 10 on the Beaufort scale.
Now, besides campus chaos, wars and rumors of wars, and the usual run of natural disasters, it looks like the DEA finally got around to learning what marijuana actually does.
“… The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration will move to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug, The Associated Press has learned, a historic shift to generations of American drug policy that could have wide ripple effects across the country….
“…Once OMB signs off, the DEA will take public comment on the plan to move marijuana from its current classification as a Schedule I drug, alongside heroin and LSD. It moves pot to Schedule III, alongside ketamine and some anabolic steroids, following a recommendation from the federal Health and Human Services Department. After the public comment period and a review by an administrative judge, the agency would eventually publish the final rule….”
“Outsider, queer and Indigenous artists are getting an overdue platform at the 60th Venice Biennale contemporary art exhibition that opened Saturday, curated for the first time by a Latin American.
“Brazilian curator Adriano Pedrosa’s main show, which accompanies 88 national pavilions for the seven-month run, is strong on figurative painting, with fewer installations than recent editions. A preponderance of artists are from the Global South, long overlooked by the mainstream art world circuits. Many are dead. Frida Kahlo, for example, is making her first appearance at the Venice Biennale. Her 1949 painting ‘Diego and I’ hangs alongside one by her husband and fellow artist, Diego Rivera….”
One of the problems, arguably, with labels like “commie” or “racist” is that what’s an insult or threat in one generation may become another generation’s cherished title.
Take “Yankee”, for example. It started as an ethnic slur — the story’s not simple, but this’ll do for today — directed at one set of New Englanders. Then Englishmen who weren’t colonists used it as an insulting label for all New Englanders.
Later, as colonists in New England got fed up with the status quo, “Yankee” became the proud name of those Americans. A few centuries later — it’s complicated.
The point I was groping for is that one generation’s insult can become another generation’s badge of excellence.
That seems to be happening with the word “queer”.
A century or so back, the word simply meant “strange” or “peculiar”. It still does, in some contexts, although I wouldn’t risk using it.
By the late 1800s, it got used as an insult to LGBT — that acronym is apparently still an acceptable label — folks, and by now it’s got a status similar to “Yankee”.
Another point, before moving along.
“Outsiders” in the context of that AP article are probably folks who do outsider art. Outsider art is not, oddly enough, landscape art or art intended for display outside. It’s art made by folks who aren’t trained as artists, or part of the “art world”.
Just to keep things confusing, outsider art can include art movements that are, arguably, part of the art world.
You want simple? Read a spy thriller, or listen to political speeches.
Just one more item: seeing the artist as an “outsider” may be a fairly recent development in Western civilization.3 Recent by my standards, that is.
Groucho Marx, Samuel Clemens, and “The Whole Law and the Prophets”
From my Google News feed. (April 29, 2024)
Thinking about respectability reminded me of a Mark Twain quote — which I learned is a Groucho Marx quote:
“I sent the club a wire stating, ‘PLEASE ACCEPT MY RESIGNATION. I DON’T WANT TO BELONG TO ANY CLUB THAT WILL ACCEPT PEOPLE LIKE ME AS A MEMBER’.” (Groucho Marx, Telegram to the Friar’s Club of Beverly Hills to which he belonged, as recounted in Groucho and Me (1959) via Wikiquote)
There’s at least one other version of that Groucho Marx quote. Remembering it as a Mark Twain wisecrack wasn’t entirely unreasonable. Samuel Clemens made a similar quip, back in 1867.
Finally, before getting to the Holy See’s art show at the Venice Biennale, something Samuel Clemens said about love of country: and rules that are simple, but incredibly hard to follow.
“I would throw out the old maxim, ‘My country, right or wrong,’ etc., and instead I would say, ‘My country when she is right.’ Because patriotism is supporting your country all the time, but your government only when it deserves it.” (Address to the Male Teachers Association of the City of New York (March 16, 1901), Mark Twain, as reported in The New York Times, via Wikiquote)
I’ll talk about “patriotism” and love of country a little later; along with how experiences of my youth colored my views.
I should — along with civil authorities — contribute to “…the good of society in a spirit of truth, justice, solidarity, and freedom….” (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2239)
That’s not easy, but it ties in with what Jesus said about “the whole law and the prophets”.
“‘Teacher, which commandment in the law is the greatest?’ He said to him, ‘You shall love the Lord, your God, with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the greatest and the first commandment. The second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. The whole law and the prophets depend on these two commandments.'” (Matthew 22:36–40)
“Strangers” and “Foreigners”, an Etymological Aside
NBC News / The Associated Press: Pope and the Biennale’s must-see prison show. (April 28, 2024)
“Francis traveled to the lagoon city to visit the Holy See’s pavilion at the Biennale contemporary art show and meet with the people who created it. But because the Vatican decided to mount its exhibit in Venice’s women’s prison, and invited inmates to collaborate with the artists, the whole project assumed a far more complex meaning, touching on Francis’ belief in the power of art to uplift and unite, and of the need to give hope and solidarity to society’s most marginalized….”
La Biennale di Venezia’s website is in Italian, with translations in English and other languages available. At least I assume it’s “languages”.
The only alternative I found was English, which is just as well: since that’s the only language I’m even close to being fluent in.
Anyway, La Biennale di Venezia translates Italian “Stranieri Ovunque” into English as “Foreigners Everywhere”.
I’m not why NBC News (and a few other outlets) translated it as “Strangers Everywhere”. Google Translate changes (Italian) “Stranieri Ovunque” into (English) “Strangers Everywhere”.
I’m inclined to think that the folks running La Biennale di Venezia are more accurate, with their “Foreigners Everywhere” rendering.
Interestingly, when I told Google Translate that “Stranieri Ovunque” was a German phrase, I got “Stranger Things” as the English translation.
That makes sense, since English (probably) got “stranger” from Old French “estrangier”. Latin used an adjective, “extraneus”, as a noun meaning “stranger”.
(Old) French “estrangier” became “estrange” in my language; “estrangier” came from Vulgar Latin extraneare, “to treat as a stranger”. And that came from Latin extraneus, “foreign, from without”.4
Basically, I figure that “stranger” is a good-enough translation of “stranieri”. But that the folks with La Biennale di Venezia did a better job, translating it as “foreigner”.
That’s partly because what I read on their website makes more sense if I apply my language’s connotations for “foreigner”.
Pop Art, Patriotism, and Perceptions
Sister Mary Corita / Corita Kent’s: “E eye love”, from the circus alphabet series. (1968)
“…Works by the late Sister Corita Kent will be on display in the facility’s cafeteria, whose Pop Art articulation of social and religious messages echoes the modern mission of the pavilion. Also notable among the pieces offered are a short film by husband-and-wife duo Perego and Saldana as well as choreography by Bintou Dembélé. The film, shot inside the Giudecca Women’s Prison, features performances by inmates as actresses. Dancer and artist Dembélé’s choreography will feature inmates as dancers, performing their own stories from their points of view. These works challenge perceptions of people convicted of crimes, allowing the women to reframe their existence on their own terms….” [emphasis mine]
There’s a lot going on here, but I’ll focus on Caitlin Finley’s lack of outrage at inmates of a women’s prison performing as actresses and dancers — and Sister Mary Corita / Corita Kent’s Camus quote.
I’ll take the Whitewall article’s apparently neutral or positive view of inmates as actresses as indirect evidence that WiP exploitation films aren’t front and center as occasions for (self?) righteous indignation.
I don’t mind living in an era where Boston Brahmins lack the clout they once enjoyed.
I’d prefer living in a world where women — in prison or otherwise — and men were both regarded as people, persons, individuals who share humanity’s transcendent dignity. (Catechism, 1929)
But that’s still a work in progress.
Now, about that Camus quote.
I’m not sure why finding reference to it, apart from Corita Kent’s 1960s art, was so hard.5 And why the only place I found the Camus quote discussed with its context was in a conservative publication.
“Camus Writes To A German Friend“ “The French existentialist takes the measure of a friend who became a Nazi” Rod Dreher, The American Conservative (October 17, 2017)
“The French existentialist Albert Camus wrote a series of letters to a German friend during World War II. The friend had become a Nazi. Here are a couple of excerpts that remind me of our time and place:
You said to me: ‘The greatness of my country is beyond price. Anything is good that contributes to its greatness. And in a world where everything has lost its meaning, those who, like us young Germans, are lucky enough to find meaning in the destiny of our nation must sacrifice everything else.’ I loved you then, but at that point we diverged. ‘No’, I told you, ‘I cannot believe that everything must be subordinated to a single end. There are means that cannot be excused. And I should like to be able to love my country and still love justice. I don’t want just any greatness for it, particularly a greatness born of blood and falsehood. I want to keep it alive by keeping justice alive.’ You retorted: ‘Well, you just don’t love your country.’ …”
I strongly suspect that this is another example of how — just as not all liberals are irresponsible fanatics bent on destroying the very fabric of society — not all conservatives are hidebound reactionaries, incapable of comprehending today’s global realities.
Me? I’m a Catholic. I don’t fit into either political pigeonhole.
Loving America Anyway
This is where I’ll touch on “patriotism” and love of country.
My teens and the 1960s overlap almost exactly.
This is not the America I grew up in. For the most part, I think this is a good thing.
There was a great deal going on in the 1960s besides a growing disgust with a non-war that lacked both perceptible goals and effective promotion. That mess helped shape my views of “patriotism” and what “America” is.
To this day, I think of the “Vietnam War” as the Indochina involvement. It was neither a war nor limited to Vietnam. Not officially a war, that is. My country’s leaders came up with a number of euphemisms, and that’s yet another topic.
By the time it was over, I’d settled for a cerebral appreciation that having governing bodies should be better than anarchy. And a firm conviction that America was a very great deal more than the Yahoos who thought they were running the place.6
One more thing: why finding the Camus quote in a conservative publication surprised me. A little.
Ranting radio preachers of my youth, plus the contrast between appeals to reason and variations on the “my country right or wrong” theme, left an impression that “conservative” and blind obedience to authority were linked.
That was the 1970s. I’ve accumulated more experiences since then. Which is yet again another topic.
Living in Isaiah’s World
Repeating what I said earlier: contributing to “…the good of society in a spirit of truth, justice, solidarity, and freedom…” is a good idea. (Catechism, 2239)
Loving my country is a good idea. Within reason. But letting love of country become worship of country is a bad idea. A very bad idea. (Catechism, 2112-2114, 2199, 2239)
And since I’m a Catholic, I must act as if good intentions are not an excuse for “intrinsically disordered” behavior. The end does not justify the means. (Catechism, 1753, 1887)
Living in a world where the folks in charge are uniformly reasonable and virtuous would be nice. But that’s not the world I grew up in. It’s not today’s world. And folks with authority behaving badly is nothing new.
“Your princes are rebels and comrades of thieves; Each one of them loves a bribe and looks for gifts. The fatherless they do not defend, the widow’s plea does not reach them.” (Isaiah 1:23)
A Glimpse Behind Cattelan’s Feet at the Venice Art Biennale
Feet!!! — Julie Baumgardner’s photo: Maurizio Cattelan’s mural for the Venice Biennale Vatican Pavilion.
Considering what ‘everybody knows’ about the Catholic Church, this is a quite balanced and objective article.
“Inside the Vatican’s Uncanny Venice Biennale Pavilion“ “Con i miei occhi (With my eyes), staged in a women’s prison, preaches visibility but operates on secrecy.” Julie Baumgardner, Hyperallergenic (April 29, 2024)
“…The Papacy is an organization that operates on secrecy. God, after all, isn’t exactly a visible figure. Faith requires a leap, a trust in the invisible. And yet visibility is at the heart of the Holy See Pavilion at the Venice Biennale, whose exhibition title, Con i miei occhi (With my eyes), is borrowed from Book of Job 42:5: ‘Mine eyes have seen thee.’ But this isn’t exactly a pavilion about ‘being seen’ in the sense of the English colloquialism denoting empathy and embrace, despite the Church’s attempts.
“No, in fact, the literal infrastructure of the pavilion is hidden. In a prison. The Giudecca Women’s Detention Home is a 13th-century monastery converted into a prison for unwed mothers, sex workers, and mentally ill people in 1859. Curators Chiara Parisi and Bruno Racine selected nine artists to create site-specific works that engage and employ the imprisoned women. Visitors to Parisi and Racine’s exhibition cannot enter (nor exit) freely. It’s a pavilion quite literally hidden behind bars….
I’m sharing these excerpts from the Hyperallergenic article partly because that site’s article is where I found the best collection of images from the Vatican’s/Holy See’s Venice Biennale Arte Pavilion.
And, given my culture’s folklore about an oppressive and un-American Catholic Church: the article is a model of objectivity.
“…It’s here that the group meets the guides: Marceby and Giulia, who both participated in the art-making. Visitors are not allowed to ask the imprisoned women personal questions — where they come from, why they’re there, how long their sentence is….”
“…There’s been critique floating around about the exploitive capacity of the pavilion. But it’s complicated by the voices of the participants. ‘I’m not an artist, but this was an opportunity to be one,’ Marceby said repeatedly during the tour. ‘I get to meet people every day, I get to write poetry, I get to connect to the outside world.’ Can a project like this be an opportunity for empowerment, as suggested by Corita Kent’s adages, and a space for hope, as in Fattal’s or Fontaine’s projects, as much as one that unfairly takes advantage of those who provide labor without receiving the benefit?…” (“Inside the Vatican’s Uncanny Venice Biennale Pavilion“, Julie Baumgardner, Hyperallergenic (April 29, 2024))
I don’t know what Julie Baumgardner would have written, if the folks running “With my eyes” had been violating the inmates’ privacy by allowing personal questions.
But like I said: her article had by far the best collection of pictures of any I found. Quite a few featured that ‘feet‘ mural by Maurizio Cattelan,7 and little else.
This next section is my selection from the Hyperallergenic article’s collection, with a few of my reactions.
“Con i miei occhi” / “With my Eyes”
Installation view: Sister Mary Corita Kent’s work at the Vatican Pavilion, Biennale Arte 2024 Venice.Claire Fontaine’s work at the Vatican Pavilion: “siamo con voi nella notte”, “we are with you in the night”.
I gather that “siamo con voi nella notte” started as graffiti in Florence: part of a 1970s Italian prison reform movement. What can I say? I don’t know the cultural and historical context: but can reasonably assume that it makes sense in this setting.
Art by Sonia Gomes at the Holy See Pavilion, seen from below.
I could tell that this display involved fabric, but wouldn’t have worked out its meaning without program notes:
“…Works by Afro-Brazilian sculptor Sonia Gomes from her series Sinfonia (2021–present), consisting of 34 woven works of fabric, stones, and buttons hanging from the ceiling in the prison’s Baroque Chapel, is a gesture to ‘look up and be free,’ as the artist told the inmates. It hangs between a fresco reading ‘Remissa sunt eius peccata multa’ — ‘Her sins, though many, are forgiven.’ There are still 80 women held at the prison as of press time….” (“Inside the Vatican’s Uncanny Venice Biennale Pavilion“, Julie Baumgardner, Hyperallergenic (April 29, 2024))
I’m not sure what to make of that “still 80 women held at the prison” remark. Or, for that matter, how many readers of Hyperallergenic understand what the Church says about forgiveness and “the duty of reparation”.
Oversimplifying — a lot — forgiveness is important. So is doing what’s possible to correct the effects of bad behavior. (Catechism, 1485-1492, 2487, 2838-2845, for a very brief overview)
How all that intersects with the Italian penal system: is far more than I know.
Same room, view from a balcony. Art by Sonia Gomes at the Holy See Pavilion.More work by Claire Fontaine at the Holy See Pavilion, Biennale Arte 2024 Venice.
Sometimes conceptual artist Claire Fontaine is referred to as “she”, but she’s actually a “they”, or maybe “them”. Either way, I think of Claire Fontaine as a studio who/that started in Paris and is now in Palermo.8
“A City of Refuge”, “The World Needs Artists”, and Pope Francis
Pope Francis and an artist at the the Venice Art Biennale. (April 28, 2024)
Pope Francis made three speeches last Sunday: two of them connected with the Vatican’s contribution to the Venice Art Biennale.
Transcripts of both, in Italian, were online by Sunday afternoon. My afternoon, that is, here in central Minnesota. English translations were online the next morning:
I’ve read, but not studied, both. Discussing either would take more time than I had left this week, after searching for a usable collection of pictures from the exhibition.
One takeaway, for me, was the pope’s “city of refuge” metaphor:
I like the “city of refuge” metaphor, although if feels a trifle forced. I suspect some of the pope’s explanation didn’t translate well into my language:
“…The city of refuge is a biblical institution, already mentioned in the Deuteronomic code (cf. Dt 4:41), intended to prevent the shedding of innocent blood and to temper the blind desire for revenge, to guarantee the protection of human rights and to seek forms of reconciliation. It would be important if the various artistic practices could establish themselves everywhere as a sort of network of cities of refuge, cooperating to rid the world of the senseless and by now empty oppositions that seek to gain ground in racism, in xenophobia, in inequality, in ecological imbalance and aporophobia, that terrible neologism that means ‘fear of the poor’….” “Visit to Venice: Meeting with artists — Church of La Maddalena, Prison Chapel on the Island of Giudecca“, Pope Francis (April 28, 2024) [emphasis in the pope’s text]
In any case, Vatican News talked about the pope’s meeting with artists:
“Pope in Venice: ‘Art is a city of refuge for humanity’“ Lisa Zengarini, Vatican News (April 28, 2024) “Addressing artists in the Giudecca’s women’s prison facility in Venice, Pope Francis invites everyone to imagine a world where no human being is considered a stranger.”
“‘The world needs artists.’ This was the message Pope Francis imparted on Sunday morning as he met with a group of artists the Holy See is exhibiting at its pavilion at the Venice Art Biennale.
“Addressing the group in the Church of La Maddalena in the Giudecca’s women’s prison facility, the Pope praised artists as true visionaries who can see beyond the boundaries of our world….”
There were three “cities of refuge”:
“Then Moses set apart three cities in the region east of the Jordan, to which a homicide might flee who killed a neighbor unintentionally, where there had been no hatred previously, so that the killer might flee to one of these cities and live: Bezer in the wilderness, in the region of the plateau, for the Reubenites; Ramoth in Gilead for the Gadites; and Golan in Bashan for the Manassites.” (Deuteronomy 4:41–43)
There’s more about how they were supposed to work in Deuteronomy 19:1–13. I could say that I’m shocked and horrified at the appalling lack of conformity to principles established in the United States Constitution: but I won’t.
Old traditions say that Moses wrote Deuteronomy.
More likely, the words of Devarim, דְּבָרִים, were scribed about two and a half millennia back: long after Moses lived and died.9 I think they very probably reflect what Moses said.
Moses, George Washington, and Me
But then, I’m one of those folks who think that Moses is as real as George Washington: even though the cherry tree incident is almost certainly a whopper.
In my darker moments, I’m surprised that serious thinkers of the 19th and 20th centuries didn’t decide that ancient Egypt and the pharaohs were make-believe.10
I suppose those whacking great piles of rock we call pyramids are hard to imagine away. And that’s still another topic.
Personal Perspective, Catholic Concerns
I’ll be summarizing a half-millennium and more of history, plus what I think explains why Pope Francis seems so interested in immigrants and other outsiders. In a few hundred words.
Hang on to your hats, here I go.
Jorge Mario Bergoglio was born in Argentina: the son of an Italian immigrant and an Italian Argentine whose ancestors were from northern Italy. Not far from Jorge’s father’s home, actually: by American standards.
The territory we call Argentina has been part of the Inca and Spanish empires. It didn’t have the Thirteen Colonies’ experience — several more topics — but it’s one of the places Italians moved to, either to get a better life, or get away from trouble at home.
Jorge’s father left Italy when Mussolini and company were active. That was an interesting part of Italy’s story.
Growing up in an immigrant family, in a country that has been going through Latin America’s post-imperial adjustments: I can see why Pope Francis thinks immigrants and folks who aren’t on the world’s A-list matter.
And that strikes me as being consistent with what the Church says about social justice. (Catechism, 1928-1942, 2241)
As for his apparent interest in art: that may run in the family. His niece, Cristina Bergoglio, is an artist who’s now living in Spain.11
Pearl-clutching (a page with two notices: “This is an essay on the civility policy. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia’s policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.” and “This page in a nutshell: Pearl-clutching is a type of civil POV pushing where an editor feigns an overreaction with a typically bad-faith invocation of WP:CIVIL.”)
Creativity and mental health (flagged: “This article needs more reliable medical references for verification or relies too heavily on primary sources….”)
Boston Brahmin (“This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources….”)
Righteous indignation (flagged “This section’s factual accuracy is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced.” — perhaps understandably)
Hyperallergic (“…an online arts magazine, based in Brooklyn, New York….”)
Maria Monk (her book, “Awful Disclosures of Maria Monk, or, The Hidden Secrets of a Nun’s Life in a Convent Exposed” (1836), enjoyed lasting popularity)
Something new each Saturday.
Life, the universe and my circumstances permitting. I'm focusing on 'family stories' at the moment. ("A Change of Pace: Family Stories" (11/23/2024))
I was born in 1951. I'm a husband, father and grandfather. One of the kids graduated from college in December, 2008, and is helping her husband run businesses and raise my granddaughter; another is a cartoonist and artist; #3 daughter is a writer; my son is developing a digital game with #3 and #1 daughters. I'm also a writer and artist.
I live in Minnesota, in America's Central Time Zone. This blog is on UTC/Greenwich time.
Support this Blog:
More Perspectives From the Catholic Laity:
Blog - David Torkington
Spiritual theologian, author and speaker, specializing in prayer, Christian spirituality and mystical theology [the kind that makes sense-BHG]