Corn Altar, Communist Crucifix, AI Pope Pic: Perspectives

David Ramos/CNA's photo: 'The Papal altar at Asuncion's Ñu Guazú park in Paraguay, July 12, 2015.
Papal altar at Asuncion’s Ñu Guazú park in Paraguay. (July 12, 2015) David Ramos/CNA photo.

About a week ago, in a discussion of what’s been happening in Vatican City, someone referred to the late Pope Francis as a “commie in a cassock”. I hadn’t run into that particular phrase, but I’m all too familiar with the attitude.

The “commie in a cassock” remark reminded me of the “communist crucifix” incident and material I’d put together, back in 2015, focusing mostly on a “corn altar” in Paraguay.

Then another non-crisis popped up, which I’ll talk about first.


Social Media Highbrow Hijinks??

Headlines about social media posts don’t make it into my news feed very often. Possibly because my online habits don’t reflect an obsession with celebrities.

At any rate: a week ago Friday, someone’s X/Twitter post got reposted on the official White House X/Twitter account.

Commentary and reactions to that post showed up in my news feed, including this:

Catholic leaders criticize Trump for posting apparent AI photo of himself as the pope
Joe Hernandez, NPR News (May 4, 2025)

“…Trump posted the image on his Truth Social account on Friday night, and shortly after it was reposted by the White House on its official X account….

“…Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the archbishop of New York who is friendly with Trump, told journalists in Rome Sunday morning that he hoped Trump ‘didn’t have anything to do with’ the image. When asked if it offended him, Dolan said, ‘it wasn’t good.’

“The New York State Catholic Conference said in a post on X: ‘There is nothing clever or funny about this image, Mr. President. We just buried our beloved Pope Francis and the cardinals are about to enter a solemn conclave to elect a new successor of St. Peter. Do not mock us.

Bishop Thomas John Paprocki of the Diocese of Springfield in Illinois said in a Facebook post that by publishing the image ‘Trump mocks God, the Catholic Church, and the Papacy.’

“Paprocki added the image was ‘deeply offensive’ — especially as Catholics continue to mourn Pope Francis and prepare for the papal conclave. ‘President Trump owes an apology to Catholics and all people of good will,’ he said….”
[emphasis mine]

I’d seen a prequel of sorts in the preceding Tuesday’s news, so I wasn’t entirely surprised.

At the time, I thought the idea of “Pope Trump” was silly, at best. I still do. I also think the bishop, archbishop, and state Catholic conference made good points.

Public notice, Boston: 'PUBLICK NOTICE - The observation of Christmas having been deemed a Sacrilege....' (1659)I’d probably feel more offended, if that “Pope Trump” remark and the funny photo didn’t represent the sort of tone-deaf — at best — understanding of the Catholic Church, Catholic beliefs, and Catholics, that’s been endemic in my country since day one.1

After decades of exposure to that sort of thing, I finally became a Catholic: and that’s another topic. I’ve talked about this before:

“…I like being an American, but realize that my country isn’t perfect: and never has been. On the whole, I think we’ve been getting better….

“…I’ll admit to a bias.

“I’m a Catholic, and like being allowed to live here. We’re even allowed to own property and vote. That’s a huge improvement over the ‘good old days’ in some parts….”
(“Independence Day 2017” > The ‘Good Old Days’ Weren’t (July 4, 2017))

Nonsense and Perspective

Rev. Branford Clarke's illustration of a particularly perilous lurking threat: the Catholic Church. Bishop Alma White's Guardians of Liberty (1943) via Wikipedia, used w/o permissionI’m not — I want to emphasize this — at all happy about that ‘Pope Trump’ picture.

As for whether it was intended as a joke, mockery, was a cluelessly tone-deaf effort at showing solidarity with America’s Catholics, or something entirely different — I have no idea.

Again, I think Cardinal Timothy Dolan, Bishop Thomas John Paprocki, and the New York State Catholic Conference, made good points. I’d feel considerably more upset, if I didn’t have decades of exposure to this sort of nonsense. After a while, it becomes just ‘more of the same’.

That said, I do see a few positive points in the “Pope Trump” picture.

For one thing, some skill went into making the image. The head’s the right size, and light is coming from the same direction for both the face and the mitre. Compared to some cut-and-paste photos I’ve seen, this one’s pretty good: and quite likely the result of someone using very up-to-date software.

For another, posting on one of Trump’s X/Twitter accounts and promptly reposting on the official White House X/Twitter account implies both some familiarity with contemporary social media and a certain degree of coordinated effort.

I’d prefer seeing these skills applied in some other way: but I’ll take indications of competence as examples that — I’d better stop now.

I’ve noticed — or, rather, not noticed — the “Pope Trump” item in my news feed this week: aside from a few blips on Monday. I’ll take that as good news.

My guess is that, a decade from now, that clever picture will be as well-remembered as the “communist crucifix” is today.


The Curious Case of the Communist Crucifix

L'Osservatore Romano's photo: 'Bolivian president Evo Morales presents Pope Francis with a 'communist crucifix' at the presidential palace in La Paz, July 8, 2015. (July 13, 2015) via Catholic News Agency, used w/o permission.
Evo Morales, Bolivian president, presents Pope Francis with a “communist crucifix”. (July 8, 2015)

I remember the “communist crucifix” micro-scandal mainly because it happened when I was distracted by technical difficulties. I’ll get back to that, briefly after this excerpt from a 2015 CNA article:

Pope calls ‘communist crucifix’ protest art, but says he wasn’t offended
Catholic News Agency (July 15, 2015)

“Responding to waves of controversy after receiving a ‘communist crucifix‘ — a carving of Christ crucified on a hammer and sickle — from Bolivian president Evo Morales, Pope Francis said he took no offense, but understands the work as ‘protest art.’

“‘I would qualify it as protest art, which in some cases can be offensive,’ the Pope said during an inflight news conference on his July 12 overnight flight from Paraguay to Rome.

But given the context of this piece of art, he added that he understands the idea behind the crucifix, and ‘for me it wasn’t an offense.’

“He recalled an exhibition in Buenos Aires several years ago in which an Argentinian artist he described as ‘a good sculptor, creative,’ and who is now deceased, made a similar piece depicting a crucified Christ on an airplane.

‘It was protest art, and I recall one, it was a crucified Christ on a bomber (airplane) that was falling down, no? It’s Christianity, but a criticism that let’s say Christianity allied with imperialism which is the bomber.’

“The crucifix, which the Pope revealed was traveling with him back to Rome, was given to him by leftist Bolivian Evo Morales on Thursday, sparking controversy….”
[emphasis mine]

Experiences of my youth suggested that “communist crucifix” hysteria might last a while. So I had a whole mess of notes about Bolivia, Evo Morales, and the last few centuries of history in that part of the world.

That was in mid-2015.

I was getting increasingly frustrated with alleged improvements in the blogging service I used at the time.

The sound and fury wailing around the “communist crucifix” died down. That, and running across more-immediately-interesting items, put the mid-2015 notes on my back burner. Besides, I was getting ready to start this iteration of A Catholic Citizen in America.

Time passed. “Pope Trump” and “commie in a cassock” popping up within days of each other reminded me of those decade-old notes. And some nice photos.

Bolivia, a Superficially Cursory Overview

Wilfredor's photo: 'Vista de uno de los mercados de la Ciudad de La Paz' 'View of one of the markets in the city of La Paz'. (2007) via Wikimedia, used w/o permission.
A market in La Paz, Bolivia. (2007)

Putting the “communist crucifix” in context involves Bolivia, so taking a very quick look at the country and the folks living there seems like a good idea.

Bolivia, like many countries in Latin America, got off to a rough start.

I’d rather live in central Minnesota than in Bolivia, even taking our climate into account: but the Latin American nation is definitely not the worst place in the world to live.

At least one recent Bolivian change of leadership was an election, a coup, or something else: which doesn’t sound good. But — I think this is important — it’s been a debatable point. Other elections, apparently, have actually been elections. People voting and everything. I see that as good news.

Bolivia isn’t, apparently, as desperately poor as it was a few decades back. Which is more good news. Who has how much wealth — that looks like a work in progress.2

The “Communist Crucifix”, “Commie in a Cassock”: Really??

Branford_Clarke's 'The Great Army for Truth and Americanism Makes Rome Tremble' from 'The Ku Klux Klan In Prophecy', by Bishop Alma Bridwell White. (1925) via Wikipedia, used w/o permission.
An old flavor of “100% Americanism”: 1925. Then: inaccurate. Now: a reason I don’t miss ‘the good old days’.

Excerpt from Mamma's Girls, Chick Publications, ©2012 by Jack T. Chick LLC; used w/o permission.That “commie in a cassock” crack last week reminded me that there’s what I strongly suspect is a small but loud demographic who are ardently “American”, and may think they are — or should be — speaking for American Christians in general. Some are Catholics: very “American” Catholics.

Others: mistaking them for typical American Christians may be possible.

But nobody’s going to reasonably suspect them of covert Catholic sympathies.

Me? I don’t expect a pope to react as if he’s a spokesman for the ‘Godliness is next to Americanism’ crowd. Or conform to more currently-fashionable “isms”.

Briefly, I’m convinced that:

  • South America isn’t the United States
  • Bolivia isn’t the Upper Midwest
  • United States firms and agencies aren’t always right

There’s a whole lot more to say, including why I don’t think the Catholic Church and Nazi Germany are part of a commie plot — run by Satan — you can’t make up stuff like this, and that’s yet another topic.

Recognizing Realities

Grant Hamilton's cartoon comment on William Jennings Bryan's 1896 'Cross of Gold' speech at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago.I’m not a huge fan of Evo Morales, or tone-deaf amalgamations of religious symbolism and partisan politics.

But I do recognize that a great many folks in Latin America, Bolivia included, have gotten hurt — hurt badly — by some American politics and self-destructive business practices.

Self-destructive in the long run. In the short run, individuals profited. In a strictly financial sense.

About the late Pope Francis receiving the “communist crucifix”, taking it back to Rome, and calling it “protest art”?

What was he supposed to do and say?

I think calling the object “protest art” is accurate, and that our first Latin American pope had more reason than most to know and understand what’s been done to folks who weren’t at the top of the heap in that part of the world.

Besides, it was a diplomatic gift.3

How I See Diplomatic Gifts

PA's photo: 'The table, which is called an EVO 8000, came with customised bats painted with the Union Jack and the Stars and Stripes flags'. (2012) via The Telegraph, UK, used w/o permission.
David Cameron’s ‘best of Britain’ gift to Barack Obama: made in China. (2012)

I had notes about diplomatic gifts. But I’ll spare you that excursion into historical and political trivia.

Except for a few high points.

Like the The Right Honourable Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton’s notion that giving an American president a ping-pong table — made in China — would make a positive impression about British know-how and industry.

Marie-Lan Nguyen's photo: the Robinson Casket, a gift from the king of Kotte to the king of Portugal. Made in Kotte, Ceylon, ca. 1557. (photo taken 2012) via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.I’m not sure why a box, decorated with a mix of Sinhalese and Christian imagery, given by the King of Kotte to the King of Portugal about a half-millennium back, struck me as connected with the 2015 “communist crucifix” brouhaha.

Maybe it was the mix of Christian and Sinhalese (folks living in Sri Lanka) visual elements. Which I don’t have a problem with, and that’s yet again another topic.

Then there was the lurid scandal of a vicuña coat, a White House Chief of Staff in the Eisenhower administration, Congress, and a zealous journalist. In 1958.

The coat was from a textile manufacturer having trouble with the FTC and Congress. Apparently, receiving the vicuña coat — and, adding to the degeneracy, an oriental rug — reflected badly on the righteousness and integrity of the White House. At any rate, the Chief of Staff lost his job, Congress kept on doing what Congress does, and the world moved on.4

Finally, I think diplomatic gifts show more about whoever gives the things — than on the pope, president, or king they’re given TO.


Altar de Maiz: Corny? Yes! — Appealing? To Me, Yes!!

David Ramos/CNA's photo: 'The Papal altar at Asuncion's Ñu Guazú park in Paraguay, July 12, 2015.
Papal altar made with corn: Asuncion’s Ñu Guazú park. (July 12, 2015) David Ramos/CNA photo.

Let’s take a closer look at that altar de maiz, “altar of corn”, where the late Pope Francis was celebrating Mass, a few days after the “communist crucifix” commotion.

I did a little extra checking this week, but a CNA article still has the best — and very nearly the only — description I found of it that’s in my native language: English.

But I did find a few good photos of it that I’d missed, back in 2015.

Photos: Views of the “Altar of Corn”

Zenoura Cazador De Instantes (Pereira Verly)'s photos: 'Altar de Maíz: desde Paraguay, para el Papa Francisco y el mundo' / 'the corn altar' in Paraguay. (2015) via Facebook, used w/o permission.
Pereira Verly’s photos of the “corn altar” made in Paraguay for the visit of Pope Francis. (2015)

There’s probably additional information on Zenoura Cazador De Instantes (Pereira Verly)’s (“Zenoura Hunter of Moments (Pereira Verly)” Facebook page. There are definitely more photos — you’ll have to sign in to see them, sorry about that.

My understanding of Spanish is very limited, so I did a screenshot of his first four thumbnails, and called it a day. Again, there’s a great deal more on his Facebook page. Clicking the “Photos of the ‘corn altar’…” image, above, should link you there.

Pereira Verly’s photos show that the “altar of corn” is very modular. Plus, you’ll see photos taken during its assembly that you may not find anywhere else.

It’s Art, It’s Sculpture, and Now It’s Recycled

Photo from '#Video Conco el altar de maíz y coco creado cara el papa': corn and coconut altar created for the pope. (2015) via Debate.com, used w/o permission
Koki Ruiz, standing in front of his “corn altar” in Paraguay. (2015)

I’ll admit to a bias: I think the “corn altar” designed by Koki Ruiz, for the 2015 visit of Pope Francis to Paraguay, looks good. And, given the intended symbolism, is appropriate for the pope’s visit.

I’ve gathered that the altar de maíz/altar of corn was used for more occasions than the Mass with Pope Francis, and had several different configurations.5 But most of what I know about it came from this article:

Spectacular Paraguay altar destined to be broken down, recycled
Catholic News Agency (July 12, 2015)

‘The coconuts will be used to make soap and the corncobs are destined to feed animals. The squash will be given to people. From it, a sweet called ‘andai’ is made,’ the artist, Kiko Ruiz, told CNA days before the celebration.

‘It’s made me very happy to do this job. There’s a great excitement among the people who collaborated with me in making the altar. This happiness motivated me to make this artwork,’ he said.

‘I know that the Pope’s visit has great significance because it’s bringing happiness and a message of peace.’

“Ruiz is the plastics artist who was charged with the creation of the altar. The structure’s base is 131 feet long and nearly 56 feet tall with a pyramidal shape. The total surface area is more than 4,305 square feet covered with corn, coconuts and squash. In the center, there’s a cross….”
[emphasis mine]

The CNA article, again, may be the most thorough English-language description of the altar de maíz available online. Why this remarkable piece of temporary and recycled art/sculpture/architecture is nearly off the radar — that’s something I don’t know. I’m just glad I could find as much as I did.


Pope Leo XIV: “…Evil Will Not Prevail….”

I was going to wrap up this week’s post with less about popes and presidents and more about positions and perceptions.

Then my wife told me, early Thursday afternoon, that we have a new pope: Leo XIV.

I’d been expecting news that the College of Cardinals had picked our 267th pope, but hadn’t realized how excited I’d be. That’s not, by itself, a bad thing; but it’s distracting.

So I’m embedding that video — just under three minutes — of Pope Leo XIV’s first speech, and sharing this excerpt from the Vatican News English transcript:

Pope Leo XIV: ‘Peace be with all of you’
Vatican News (May 8, 2025)

“…Allow me to continue that same blessing. God loves us, all of us, evil will not prevail. We are all in the hands of God. Without fear, united, hand in hand with God and among ourselves, we will go forward. We are disciples of Christ, Christ goes before us, and the world needs His light. Humanity needs Him like a bridge to reach God and His love. You help us to build bridges with dialogue and encounter so we can all be one people always in peace.

Thank you Pope Francis!”
[emphasis mine]

About that statement: “evil will not prevail” — it’s not exactly news to me, but it’s also nice to get a reminder now and again.

Next, I’ll slap down a highly-abbreviated version of what I was going to say — and then sit back, relax, get a cup of coffee — and very likely do more relaxing.


Odds and Ends: a Sozzled Scientist’s Sausage, Goofy Gifts to Popes

A 'top scientist's' photo: a slice of chorizo, with a black background, which he described as a James Webb Space Telescope image of Proxima Centauri.I had planned on comparing the “Pope Trump” X/Twitter post to a celebrated scientist’s photo of a sausage slice: which he said was an image of Proxima Centauri, taken by the Webb space telescope.

Then, as folks were discussing the alleged image of our nearest star, the scientist sobered up. According to him, he’d had a perfectly good reason for taking that photo. And for saying his photo of a chorizo slice was actually a JWST image of Proxima Centauri.

I think that incident shows something about human nature and the advisability of writing — and posting — while intoxicated.

But I also think it says little or nothing about either science or Spanish sausage.

Okay. I’ve gotten “Proxima Chorizo” off my checklist. I’ve put links to some of what I’ve said about social media and dealing with differences in the footnotes.6

Finally, I’d found something in The Glasgow Herald that I’d planned on using in a discussion of weird gifts folks give the pope.

I’m sharing a mostly-legible image of the thing and calling your attention to the tricycle sent by a Frenchman, a whale’s skeleton, riding boots, and the goat mentioned in the article:

The Glasgow Herald article: 'Strange Gifts to a Pope'. (March 19, 1888)

Picking popes, making sense:


1 Being Catholic in America has had its ups and downs:

2 Bolivia isn’t Minnesota:

Someone's possibly-inaccurate map of Sri Lanka's Geopolitical situation in the 1520s. Via Wikipmedia Commons, used w/o permission.3 Assorted miscellanea and, right, a possibly-inaccurate map of Sri Lanka’s geopolitics of the 1520s:

4 A British Lord, and a vicuña overcoat my father told me about:

5 Stuff I could have talked about, but didn’t:

6 Part of my take on dealing with differences in general and social media in particular:

Posted in Being Catholic, Discursive Detours, Journal | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Pope Leo XIV: the 267th Bishop of Rome

My wife told me a few minutes ago. We have a new pope.

His name, now, is Leo XIV. I gather that he’s the first Pope who is also an Augustinian, and the second from this side of the Atlantic. He became a Cardinal last year.

At the moment, I’m — rather excited, actually.

I’ll be learning more about him, and very likely seeing the usual opinions expressed. Maybe I’ll talk about that, maybe not. In any case, Vatican News has a couple potentially-interesting articles:

And a quick excerpt:

Leo XIV is the new Pope
Vatican News (May 8, 2025)

“‘Peace be with all of you!’ — the first words of Pope Leo XIV. The Conclave has elected Robert Francis Cardinal Prevost as the 267th Bishop of Rome. The new pope was announced to the waiting crowds by Cardinal Protodeacon Dominique Mamberti….

“…The following year, he joined the mission in Trujillo, also in Peru, as director of the joint formation project for Augustinian candidates from the vicariates of Chulucanas, Iquitos, and Apurímac….”

A Catholic Citizen in America won’t become an ‘all-popes-all-the-time’ blog, but I’m getting a pope-related post ready for Saturday, and I wrote about some of their history last week:

Posted in Discursive Detours, Journal | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Prescription Filled: A Small Matter, but Good News

This is an update to Monday’s unscheduled post.

I still don’t know why this household got a robocall shortly after I’d started the process of requesting authorization so that a local pharmacy could take care of a necessary prescription.

But it’s a moot point, since (1) an authorization was written, (2) the authorization was sent to the pharmacy, (3) the pharmacy received the authorization, and (4) had enough methylphenidate on hand to give me another month’s supply.

Next month, I’ll go through the same process. But for now, I’ve got another four weeks of being able to use my brain without fighting the machinery. That’s good news.

I talked about this month’s excitement, briefly, on Monday:

Posted in Journal | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Filling a Prescription: Jumping Through Extra Hoops This Month

My methylphenidate prescription, with one day left. (June 10, 2021)
My methylphenidate prescription, which must be re-authorized each month.

First, the good news.

I have enough methyphenidate for another five days, and may be in the process of resolving another SNAFU with both getting the legally-required authorization properly processed and satisfying the paper-shuffling needs of every organization involved.

The very frustrating news is that something happened this time, which resulted in this household getting a robocall which may or may not have originated with one of the aforementioned organizations.

Back to good news: it’s been a bit over a year and a half since getting this prescription filled involved either a bureaucratic mess or a serious supply issue.

That really is good news. But at the moment, sorting this month’s mess out — trying to, at any rate — has already taken nearly two hours. And, as of early afternoon this Monday, still has not been untangled.

Prudence, Paranoia, or Maybe a Bit of Both

Pmillerrhodes' radar chart, showing data from 'Development of a rational scale to assess the harm of drugs of potential misuse'; Nutt, David, Leslie A King, William Saulsbury, Colin Blakemore; The Lancet. (2007) (369:1047-1053. PMID:17382831). Via Wikipedia, used w/o permission.
Chart showing potential drug issues, from a 2007 study.

Hygienic Productions's film poster: 'The Devil's Weed', also released as 'Wild Weed', 'Marijuana, the Devil's Weed', 'The Story of Lila Leeds and Her Exposé of the Marijuana Racket', 'She Shoulda Said No!' (1949)The need for a legally-required authorization involves methylphenidate being a “controlled substance”, which reflects concerns which have some merit.

I also think that the frustration I’m dealing with this week, although coming from reasonable concerns, is also rooted in sincerely-felt paranoia and panic going back at least to the 1930s.

'Reefer Madness' (1936, released 1938-1939) theatrical release poster. (1972)I’ve talked about the controlled substances act, “Reefer Madness”, “Captain Planet”, and perceptions — and my monthly prescription saga — before:

Posted in Journal | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Electing a Pope: Current Events, Ancient Heritage

Screenshot from Basilica of St. Peter's Papal Basilica of St. Peter's VR tour: St. Peter's Square (night). 'Special thanks to Villanova University in Pennsylvania (USA) for its contribution to the realization of the Virtual Reality Tour of the Basilica of Saint Peter.' See https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/virtual-tour-st-peters-basilica-now-online (2010) used w/o permission.
St. Peter’s Square and Basilica, from St Peter’s Basilica Virtual Tour.

More than 130 Cardinals will start voting on who gets Simon Peter’s job — the job he had before becoming St. Peter — after Pope Francis, starting next Monday.

Conclave to elect new Pope to begin on May 7th
Lisa Zengarini, Devin Watkins; Vatican News (April 28, 2025)

“…The Cardinals present in Rome have agreed to begin the conclave on May 7th, 2025.

“The date was set on Monday morning by the approximately 180 cardinals present (just over a hundred of whom are electors) gathered for the fifth General Congregation in the Vatican.

“The conclave will take place in the Vatican’s Sistine Chapel, which will remain closed to visitors during those days….”


Viewpoints and Background

Ricardo André Frantz's photo of Bernini's baldacchino, inside Saint Peter's Basilica, Vatican City. (2005)Earlier this week, coverage and discussions of the Catholic Church and the upcoming conclave ranged from the retrospective to the silly:

I’ve seen a few discussions of what will be happening at the conclave. So far, this is among the most detailed:

Conclave to elect new Pope to begin on May 7th
Lisa Zengarini, Devin Watkins; Vatican News (April 28, 2025))

“…What happens during the conclave?

“The conclave will be preceded by a solemn Eucharistic celebration with the votive Mass Pro Eligendo Pontifice attended by the Cardinal electors.

“In the afternoon, the Cardinal electors proceed in a solemn procession to the Sistine Chapel, where the Conclave begins to elect the new Pope….”

“…They also pledge to maintain absolute secrecy regarding everything related to the election of the Roman Pontiff and to refrain from supporting any attempts of external interference in the election….”

The Cardinals also take an oath to faithfully carry out the Munus Petrinum if they’re chosen as the next pope. That’s Latin for Petrine Office: the pope’s job. “Pro Eligendo Pontifice”, mentioned in that excerpt, came out as “For Electing a Pope” when I ran it through Google Translate.

My Latin’s rusty, at best, but that sounds about right.

I’ll be mildly surprised if nobody complains about the “absolute secrecy” angle.

Expectations

Louis M. Glackens' cartoon in Puck: 'The Yellow Press'. William Randolph Hearst as a jester tossing newspapers with headlines such as 'Appeals to Passion, Venom, Sensationalism, Attacks on Honest Officials, Strife, Distorted News, Personal Grievance, Misrepresentation' to a crowd of eager readers, among them an anarchist assassinating a politician speaking from a platform draped with American flags; on the left, men labeled 'Man who buys the comic supplement for the kids, Businessman, Gullible Reformer, Advertiser, and Decent Citizen' carry bags of money that they dump into Hearst's printing press'. (October 12, 1910)“Transparency” has been a buzzword for some time now. Understandably, considering the opportunities we’ve had to notice disconnects between what folks with influence and authority say, what they do, and what they’re — I’d better stop now.

So, how come I’m not ranting and raving about the upcoming ‘lack of transparency’, and how not allowing “attempts of external interference in the election” would keep me from lobbying the cardinals? Or reading what some editor thought about the latest juicy details?

It’s complicated, but basically — I figure that enough folks will be upset as it is, when the College of Cardinals picks someone they wouldn’t have.

Getting even more of these easily-offended folks upset by letting them know why their personal preferences don’t dominate the College of Cardinals strikes me as pointless, and maybe unkind.

Cardinals: Not Just European

College of Cardinals' header image from www.vatican.va/roman_curia/cardinals/index.htm.
Header for The College of Cardinals page on Vatican.va.

It’s been about two decades since the College of Cardinals picked a new pope.

I’d enjoy digging into the institution’s history, seeing what the process was then and how it’s changed. That’s not going to happen, since I’m dealing with a time-and-effort-draining medical situation. Nothing major, but it’s been distracting.

So I took a quick look at a few resources, including this article:

Conclave: Who will elect the next Pope
Lisa Zengarini, Tiziana Campisi; Vatican News (April 29, 2025)

“…The 135 Cardinals Electors of the College of Cardinals hail from 71 different countries across the five continents….

“…During his 12 years of pontificate Pope Francis significantly reshaped the College of Cardinals, making it a less Euro-centric and a more international body. This reflected both the late Pope’s personal inclination to shift the centre of gravity of Catholicism toward the Global South, with a focus on the ‘peripheries’, and the broader trend that the Church of the future will likely have an increasingly non-European face….

“…However, Europe still carries a significant weight in the College of Cardinals. The old continent is represented by 53 Cardinal electors (some of whom head Dioceses and Archdioceses in non-European countries, or serve as Apostolic Nuncios abroad or in the Curia), with Italy still having the largest number (19), followed by France (6) and Spain (5)….

“…37 Cardinal electors are from the Americas (16 from North America, 4 from Central America, and 17 from South America), 23 from Asia, 18 from Africa, and 4 from Oceania….”

Let’s look at those numbers, how many Cardinals are from which continents:

  • 58 Europe
  • 37 the Americas
    • 17 South America
    • 16 North America
    • 4 Central America
  • 23 Asia
  • 18 Africa
  • 4 Oceania

Adding those up, I got 140 Cardinals. Five of them apparently aren’t eligible to vote for our next pope:

“…Of the 135 Cardinals eligible to vote, two have confirmed they won’t be able to attend the Conclave for health reasons bringing  the total  down to 133….”
(“Conclave: Who will elect the next Pope” Lisa Zengarini, Tiziana Campisi; Vatican News (April 29, 2025))

I hadn’t expected to see that many Cardinals from North America. Maybe Vatican News sees North America as extending beyond Mexico, maybe — and very likely — my knowledge of global demographics is a tad out of date.

At any rate, I didn’t mind seeing so many Cardinals from my part of the world. I also didn’t mind seeing that the College of Cardinals is reflecting changes in what I’ll call Catholic demographics.

We’ve been καθολικός, katholikos, universal, catholic, from very early on. It’s becoming increasingly obvious, and that’s another topic.1


The Catholic Church: Unchanging Basics, Changing Details

Screenshot from Basilica of St. Peter's Papal Basilica of St. Peter's VR tour: St. Peter's north transept. 'Special thanks to Villanova University in Pennsylvania (USA) for its contribution to the realization of the Virtual Reality Tour of the Basilica of Saint Peter.' See https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/virtual-tour-st-peters-basilica-now-online (2010) used w/o permission.)
St. Peter’s, north transept; from St Peter’s Basilica Virtual Tour.

One thing I like about being a Catholic is that we have roots, depth.

Carl Emil Doepler the Elder's 'Fronleichnamsprozession/Corpus Christi procession.'Each time I’m at Mass, I take part in a ritual that’s been essentially the same for two millennia: and will stay essentially the same for however many millennia lie ahead.

By any reasonable standard, it’s a big deal.

EUCHARIST: The ritual, sacramental action of thanksgiving to God which constitutes the principal Christian liturgical celebration of and communion in the paschal mystery of Christ. The liturgical action called the Eucharist is also traditionally known as the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. It is one of the seven sacraments of the Church; the Holy Eucharist completes Christian initiation (1322 ff.). The Sunday celebration of the Eucharist is at the heart of the Church’s life (2177). See Mass.”

MASS: The Eucharist or principal sacramental celebration of the Church, established by Jesus at the Last Supper, in which the mystery of our salvation through participation in the sacrificial death and glorious Resurrection of Christ is renewed and accomplished. The Mass renews the paschal sacrifice of Christ as the sacrifice offered by the Church. It is called ‘Mass’ (from the Latin missa) because of the ‘mission’ or ‘sending’ with which the liturgical celebration concludes (Latin: ‘Ite, Missa est.’) (1332; cf. 1088, 1382, 2192). See Eucharist; Paschal Mystery/Sacrifice.”
(Catechism of the Catholic Church, Glossary)

Another thing I like about being a Catholic is that trying desperately to live as if it’s still the first century, the 1950s, or some other ‘good old days’ is not a core principle.

We have, over the last two millennia, changed some of our rules, adopted new styles — one of these days I’ll talk about Baroque, but not today.

From Gainsborough Pictures: Isabel Jeans, in the film 'Easy Virtue', directed by Alfred Hitchcock. (1928) from Wikipedia, via https://www.flickr.com/photos/193889603@N04/51533655578/ and Yellow Cap Data, used w/o permission.I figure these changes will continue inspiring fervent pearl-clutching among folks who I’ll hope and assume equate their youth’s fashions and mores with virtue.

Some of our rules we can’t change.

For example, Jesus said we should love God, love our neighbor, and see everybody as our neighbor. Everybody. No exceptions. (Matthew 5:4344, 22:3640; Mark 12:2831; Luke 6:31, 10:2537; Catechism, 1789)

Putting it mildly, that’s not easy. But it has been and will continue being one of the rules we’re told to live by. Some of us don’t love our neighbors, or don’t love them consistently, but it’s still a rule.

Moving along.

A Millennium of Cardinals: Very Briefly

CNS photo/Vatican Media: Pope Francis giving his blessing to participants in an international conference on the ongoing formation of priests in the Paul VI Audience Hall, Vatican City. (February 8, 2024)
Pope Francis and international conference participants in Paul VI Audience Hall, Vatican City. (2024)

The College of Cardinals of the Catholic Church hasn’t always been there. They’ve been the part of the Roman Curia that decides who becomes the next pope since 1059, but the College didn’t exist before 1050.

Rules for the College of Cardinals have been changing over the last millennium.

Starting in the 12th century, Cardinals living outside Rome could be part of the College. We were going through a rough patch at the time — so starting in the 13th century, Cardinals selecting a pope were isolated from outside influence, and the rest of us kept in the dark about what was going on inside. I talked about “transparency” earlier.

Changes in how the College of Cardinals operates didn’t stop then. From the 13th to 15th century, there weren’t usually more than 30 members. Pope Sixtus V made it a rule that there wouldn’t be more than 70 in the College of Cardinals.

Today we’ve got upwards of 200 Cardinals, with 130-plus able to vote on who our next pope will be. That’s more than 60 over the total I got from that Vatican News article, and I haven’t found where the ‘extra’ Cardinals come from.

Pope Sixtus V’s rule obviously got changed somewhere between the 16th and 20th centuries. But finding, sorting, and making sense of a half-millennium’s accumulation of commentary on the College is far more than I’ve got time or resources for. So I’ll wrap this bit up, talk about more stuff that keeps changing, and call it a day.

Besides picking our popes, I gather that the College of Cardinals is an advisory council.2

The Last Supper: da Vinci, Dali, and Me

Leonardo da Vinci's 'The Last Supper' mural in the Santa Maria delle Grazie Church, Milan. (ca. 1495-1498)
Leonardo da Vinci’s “The Last Supper”. (ca. 1495-1498)

About five centuries back, Leonardo da Vinci painted a mural that’s arguably today’s most famous image of the Last Supper.

There’s a scaled-down and re-done framed poster of da Vinci’s painting some 15 feet from my desk, with the door that was cut in the refectory’s wall edited out and a bit of embellishment on the viewer’s side of the table.

I’m drifting off-topic, or maybe not so much.

For many folks, da Vinci’s “The Last Supper” may be the definitive image for that event. That might account for a Protestant theologian calling Salvador Dali’s “The Sacrament of the Last Supper” “junk”.

Salvador Dali's 'The Sacrament of the Last Supper'. (1955) National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C.; see https://www.nga.gov/collection/art-object-page.46590.html; via Wikipedia; used w/o permissionI agree that the 20th century artist didn’t paint something that looks like it was made in the 15th century. But I think a Catholic theologian was nearer the mark in assessing Dali’s painting:

“Dalí’s true intention, which he has masterfully accomplished on this canvas, is to remind us of what is occurring in every celebration of this mystery of bread and wine: that the worship here on Earth makes present the realities of worship in Heaven.”
(“Misunderstood Masterpiece”, Catholic Theologian Michael Anthony Novak. (2012) via The Sacrament of the Last Supper, Symbolism and interpretations, Wikipedia)

I don’t and won’t insist that everybody should like Dalí’s painting better than da Vinci’s. But I do think that both are, arguably, examples of sacred art:

“2502 Sacred art is true and beautiful when its form corresponds to its particular vocation: evoking and glorifying, in faith and adoration, the transcendent mystery of God — the surpassing invisible beauty of truth and love visible in Christ, who ‘reflects the glory of God and bears the very stamp of his nature,’ in whom ‘the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily.’ This spiritual beauty of God is reflected in the most holy Virgin Mother of God, the angels, and saints. Genuine sacred art draws man to adoration, to prayer, and to the love of God, Creator and Savior, the Holy One and Sanctifier.”

“2513 The fine arts, but above all sacred art, ‘of their nature are directed toward expressing in some way the infinite beauty of God in works made by human hands. Their dedication to the increase of God’s praise and of his glory is more complete, the more exclusively they are devoted to turning men’s minds devoutly toward God’ (SC 122).”
(Catechism, 2502, 2513, and see VI. Truth, Beauty, and Sacred Art) [emphasis mine]

About those two paintings of the Last Supper: I’m convinced that artworks, and ideas, aren’t good because they’re old and bad because they’re new — or that new is always good and old always bad.3

Life, and reality, isn’t that simple.


Newfangled Architecture, Old-Fashioned Attitudes —

Guglielmo Mangiapane's photo, via CNS / Reuters: general audience of Pope Francis in the Vatican's Paul VI hall (August 11, 2021)
It’s not 1059 any more: general audience with Pope Francis in the Paul VI Audience Hall. (August 2021)

Then there’s newfangled architecture, ecclesiastical and otherwise: like the Paul VI Audience Hall, just south of St. Peter’s Basilica. It seats 6,300, serving as a conference site and an alternative to St. Peter’s Square for a pope’s audiences.

Google image search, New Synod Hall (Aula Nuova del Sinodo) Paul VI Audience Hall 21st result: two aerial photos of the Paul VI Audience Hall near St. Peter's basilica, one interior view of the Paul VI Audience Hall, two photos of snakes' heads. (search done May 1, 2025)It’s not a church building, used for worship, so the Paul VI Audience Hall isn’t, strictly speaking, ecclesiastical architecture.4

But it’s just simply crawling with Catholic cooties, so I ran into discussions of it’s snaky and sinister Satanic symbolism.

Maybe that should bother me more than it does, but after a lifetime’s exposure to my native culture’s quirks — it’s pretty much what I’ve come to expect from the frightfully fervent faithful.

Personally, I like the looks of the Paul VI Audience Hall. Not that my opinion counts for much in the great scheme of things.

I also learned a bit about the new(ish) building, including a smaller meeting hall that’s on an upper level. Spinning what I found into a spine-tingling description of ‘secret chambers’ where deviously deep, dark and dastardly deeds are discussed is an option. But not, I think, a reasonable one.

Instead, I’ve made a few notes about what I’ve been finding, and may talk about Vatican City’s architecture. Eventually.


— and a Reasonable Request

Finally, getting back to the College of Cardinals and picking our next pope, they’ve made a prayer request or two:

Makes sense to me, particularly since the more recent article won’t let me use the ‘I’m not qualified’ excuse. So I’ve added a short prayer to my daily routine.

Now, the usual links to more-or-less-related stuff:


1 Cardinals, popes, a little history, and a literally universal Church:

2 A (very) little more history:

3 A famous mural, a 20th century painting, and dubious performance art:

4 Architecture, interior decor, and a Pope:

Posted in Being Catholic, Discursive Detours, Journal | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments