A ‘Technical’ Week: Mostly Working on Widgets

First, not-so-good news.

A month after deciding to start using WordPress blocks before their classic user interface became one with Nineveh, Tyre and rotary telephones — I don’t have the usual Saturday post ready.

The good news is that I’m more comfortable with WordPress blocks than I’d feared.

And, more good news, I’ve finally finished updating this blog’s widgets.

The frustrating news is that updating, fixing and in some cases removing widgets took all this week. I finished the last (I hope) of that task Friday afternoon.

The process would have gone faster if the WordPress ‘blocks’ user interface didn’t take between ten minutes and an hour to load all of its nifty new ‘blocks’ widgets editing page.

The page itself, along with several dozen ‘you got problems’ messages, came up promptly. What sometimes never loaded were the little — dialog boxes? block bits? — that represented ‘pre-block’ widgets.1

That was then, this is now. The nifty new ‘blocks’ widgets editing page now loads with no more than up to a half-dozen ‘you got problems’ messages. And, thankfully, most of the little — dialog boxes? block bits? — load without giving me time for a coffee break.

Now some definitely not-so-good news. Although it could be worse.

Hello HTTPS; Goodbye RSS

Brian H. Gill's 'Meet Norbert Nerdly.' (2015) 'Norbert Nerdly — my frustrations, personified.'

A Catholic Citizen in America is now on a Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS) domain — which I gather is a good thing.

However, anyone who had been using this blog’s RSS feed stopped getting new content the moment that “https” thing went into effect. After a little checking, I’ve found no way of restoring A Catholic Citizen in America’s RSS feed.

And I’m pretty sure that RSS and https won’t work together. Which may be part of why HTTPS is so much more secure, and that’s another topic.2 Topics.

Checking in each Saturday, or however often seems convenient, is one option for seeing new content here.

So is getting notifications via email. I really wish email notifications were easier to find. And that alternatives — I’ll get back to that.

Email Notifications Available: But Not Easy to Find

Image of A Catholic Citizen in America's comment form, showing 'Notify me of new comments via email' and 'Notify me of new comments via email' checkboxes.
(Note: This is an image of the comment form, not the real thing.)

Right now, the “Notify me of new comments via email” and “Notify me of new posts via email” checkboxes are on the comment form. At the bottom of the comment form.

And those “Notify me of new…” checkboxes will not appear unless you make a comment, or at least click in the “Enter your comment here” box.

I don’t know what would happen if someone clicked a “Notify me of new…” with a blank “Enter your…” box, and then clicked the “Post Comment” button. [Update July 16, 2022 – apparently there must be something in the comment box, or the ‘post comment’ button won’t work.]

This “Notify me of new…” option should work, and is part of this blog’s Jetpack software. More about Jetpack on the Privacy Policy page. [Update July 16, 2022 – The “Notify me of new posts” service apparently does work. It did for me, at any rate. Once. 🙂 ]

I’d prefer having more options for folks who want email notifications or something like the now-unavailable RSS feed.

Make that acceptable options. I found widget-using software that promised easy handling of email lists.

Easy, I got the impression, for folks who see no problem with spamming their readers.3

I could be wrong about ‘Spamalot Services’ — catchy name, that, but fictional.

Like I said, I could be wrong about the software I’m not using. But if I’m right, that’s emphatically not what I want to do.

So that’s what I’ve been doing this week. Working on widgets. Mostly.

I’ve also been reading Kramer’s “History Begins at Sumer,” enjoying a visit from son-in-law and granddaughter; and plan to take it easy this weekend.

And hoping that next week I’ll have something about science, history, Faustus — or pretty much anything other than another ‘technical’ report ready

Last week’s ‘Saturday’ post, and earlier ‘technical’ stuff:


1 Social media stuff:

2 Acronyms:

3 Something annoying — and expensive:

Posted in Journal | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

Independence Day: America and Acting Like Love Matters

Paul Manship's Prometheus sculpture for Rockefeller Center (New York City) lower plaza. (1934) Photo by Balon Greyjoy. (2013)
(From Balon Greyjoy, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(Prometheus sculpture for Rockefeller Center’s lower plaza. (Paul Manship, 1934))

It’s been 246 years since a bunch of disgruntled colonists decided that they’d had enough of transatlantic micromanagement.

There’s more behind the Declaration of Independence than that. But today I’m focused more on what’s happening and what’s ahead, than on where we’ve been.

Although, given the way I see things, that involves looking back, too.


Living in “The World of Tomorrow”

Nighttime photo of the 1939 World's Fair, New York City. (September 15, 1939.)
(From Library of Congress / New York Public Archives, via rarehistoricalphotos.com, used w/o permission.)
(“Dawn of a New Day” — “the world of tomorrow.” The 1939-1940 World’s Fair.)

The 1939 New York World’s Fair was the first world’s fair looking to the future.

Its theme was “Building the World of Tomorrow,” its slogan was “the world of tomorrow.”

The exposition opened April 30, 1939.

German invaded Poland September 1, 1939. World War II ended August 15, 1945.1 I was born in 1951.

From a 1939 viewpoint, I’ve been living in “the world of tomorrow” all my life. It’s not been quite a streamlined as the World’s Fair version, and neither as utopian nor as apocalyptic as the predictions of dreamers and doomsayers.

Patriots, Pigeonholes and Attitudes

Cheez-It(r)'s 'Big Cheese' carving inspired by Mt. Rushmore. (2007)
(From Cheez-It via globenewswire.com, used w/o permission.)
(Cheesy? Literally, yes. Metaphorically, maybe. Fun? I think so (2007))

Maybe I’d be more comfortable with words like “patriot” and “patriotism” if I hadn’t grown up in the ’60s.

McCarthyism’s heyday was over. Some Americans wondered if unwavering faith in HUAC’s wisdom was prudent.

Kids were growing up in a world with tech and prosperity their parents hadn’t known.

Disconnects between slogans and action, ideals and attitudes, were becoming obvious.

I was in my teens when McCarthyism’s dying gasps mingled with lyrics like these:

“…If the mind is baffled
When the rules don’t fit the game,
Who will answer?…”
(“Who Will Answer?” Ed Ames (1967))

“…Go ahead and hate your neighbor
Go ahead and cheat a friend
Do it in the name of heaven
You can justify it in the end….”
(“One Tin Soldier” Dennis Lambert, Brian Potter (1969))

“…Imagine there’s no countries
It isn’t hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace….”
(“Imagine,” John Lennon (1971))

I didn’t, and don’t, think “Imagine’s” “no religion too” will make this a better world. And that’s another topic. But I think I understand what Lennon had in mind.

To this day, the words “patriot” and “conservative” register as ‘crazy person lost in yesteryearning’ — along with jingoism, nativism and toxic nationalism.2

Unless I think about it. Which is a reason I make thinking a priority.

Pigeonholes and “the Establishment”

Flag of the United States of America.I don’t call myself a conservative, liberal, libertarian, or whatever: mainly because today’s sociopolitical pigeonholes and my beliefs aren’t a good match.

I’m a Catholic, so my views on capital punishment, marriage, and staying healthy line up with liberal, conservative, undecided — and that’s yet another topic. Topics.

So, if I’m not nestled into one of today’s mainstream political pigeonholes, and am Catholic to boot, can I be a patriot?

Well, yes. But it depends on what the word means. I’ll take Merriam-Webster’s definition: “one who loves and supports his or her country.”3

“The Establishment,” Then and Now: Attitudes and Goals

'I'd force peace right down their bloodthirsty throats.' Deacon Mushrat in Walt Kelly's Pogo. (1952)Back in the ’60s, “the establishment,” folks who enjoyed prestige and influence, saw what has happening. They didn’t like it.

Some, not all, apparently decided that since what they’d been doing didn’t work — they should do it more forcefully.

That didn’t work either. Not the way they intended.

Maybe stalwart defenders of their status quo believed they were the last true patriots.

Calling devotion to their opinions “patriotism” helped me associate the word with nativism, hubris, and anger.

I now recognize distinctions between patriotism, nationalism and jingoism. I’ve also learned to appreciate the value and risks of using labels.

Time passed. The upper crust of today’s establishment are around my age. Many probably shared my youthful conviction that we can do better. Maybe they still think so.

The trick, then and now, isn’t just thinking we can do better. It’s seeing what will work. And doing it.


My Country

John Trumbull's 'Declaration of Independence.' (1819)
(From John Trumbull, via Wikipedia, used w/o permission.)
(John Trumbull’s “Declaration of Independence.” (1819))

Detail, NASA's 'Blue Marble image (2002) orthographic projection (2005)Whether or not I’m a patriot depends, again, on definitions.

The Merriam-Webster dictionary says a patriot is someone “who loves and supports his or her country.”

Assuming that love of country stops well short of idolatry, and that my support is the sort that makes sense, I’m a patriot.

It’s an obligation, if I take being a Catholic seriously.

Living as if my faith matters boils down acting as if loving God and my neighbors matters. And seeing everyone as my neighbor. (Matthew 5:4344, 7:12, 22:3640, Mark 12:2831; 10:2527, 2937; Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1789)

Acting like love matters is easier when my reason and emotions are in sync. But easy or hard, using my brain is a good idea. (Catechism, 1777-1782)

As a Catholic, I’m obliged to do what’s possible in public life: recognizing humanity’s solidarity, and respecting authority. Within reason. (Catechism, 1778, 1915, 1897-1917, 1939-1942, 2199, 2238-2243)

Seeing my country’s system as the worst one possible, except for all others, is okay. Thinking that everyone should be Americans, or run their countries like ours, not so much.

There isn’t one ‘correct’ form of government. Different cultures and eras have different needs, and that’s okay. (Catechism, 1915, 1957-1958)

I think my country has much to offer the world. I’d rather live here than anywhere else. If that’s loving my country, then I love America.

I’d prefer living in a world where everyone could feel that way about their homeland. Not because it’s like America, but because it’s a unique moment in the life of a land and people.

The Apotheosis of Washington: I do Not Miss the ‘Good Old Days’

John James Barralet's 'Apotheosis of Washington,' based on work by Gilbert Stuart. (1800-1802)
(From The Met, used w/o permission.)
(John Barralet’s “Apotheosis of Washington,” based on Gilbert Stuart’s art. (1800-1802))

Goofy as the ‘regular Americans’ of my youth were, mainstream “patriotism” could have been worse.

Detail of Constantino Brumidi's 'The Apotheosis of Washington,' United States Capitol rotunda. (1865)
Detail of Constantino Brumidi’s ‘The Apotheosis of Washington,’ United States Capitol rotunda. (1865)

We’d finally gotten away from attitudes that inspired Barralet’s and Brumidi’s “Apotheosis of Washington.”

If the two figures flanking “Sacred to the Memory of Washington…” seem familiar, they should.

They’re traditional renderings of Lady Liberty, left; and an American Indian/Native American, right. And their postures resemble traditional images of sleeping soldiers at Christ’s tomb.4

Now, I have no problem with showing respect to the memory of folks like Washington.

But imagery that suggests America’s first president is on a par with the Second Person of the Trinity seems a bit much. Can’t say that I miss the attitude that made it popular.


Change Happens

Thomas Nast's 'The American River Ganges.' (May 8, 1875) Anti-Catholic cartoon from Harper's Weekly magazine.The world keeps changing.

Some of what’s happened since the ’60s is an improvement. Some, in my view, isn’t.

Today’s America isn’t just like the ’60s, but I see parallels.

A fair fraction of Americans don’t entirely approve of the status quo. What’s worse, from today’s establishment viewpoint, change is happening.

I very strongly suspect that’s frustrating, and probably frightening, to folks who have been near the top of the heap for the last several decades.

Today’s establishment wouldn’t, most likely, notice that they’re reacting pretty much as their predecessors did.

The details are different, but I see the same pattern.

Emphasis has been shifting from goals to fears. Slogans seem more like shibboleths than rallying cries.

Words like “tolerance” may be following “patriotism” into dead storage. And “freedom” still means “free to agree with me” in some circles.

I don’t like political sound and fury. That’s an attitude I had in the ’60s, and never lost.

I certainly don’t think today’s America is as good as it gets. And I remember our past too well to want a rerun.

But I think hope makes sense.

Change is happening. And this can be a good thing.

America, Alabaster Cities and Hair

Charles Dudley Arnold's photo of Chicago Expo 1893; Court of Honor, Columbia fountain.
(From Charles Dudley Arnold, via Meisje L. J. Connor, used w/o permission.)
(World’s Columbian Exposition, Chicago. (1893))

Again, I like living in America. I think it’s a good place to live. I also think we can do better.

Doing better doesn’t mean dragging America back to an earlier time.

Even if I could, I wouldn’t.

The ’60s happened in part because so many folks had gotten fed up with the status quo. We changed because what we had wasn’t working.

Yesteryear won’t come back

Today needs improvement.

That leaves one direction: forward.

We move forward in time, no matter what we do. Or don’t do.

Moving toward a goal requires having a goal, and ideas for how to get from here to there.

Daydreaming about ‘good old days’ that haven’t happened yet can be nothing more than an occasionally-pleasant pastime.

But I think there’s some value in having a “patriot dream.”

“…O beautiful for patriot dream
That sees beyond the years
Thine alabaster cities gleam
Undimmed by human tears!…”
(“America the Beautiful,” Katharine Lee Bates, 1911 version, via Wikipedia)

Detail, Joseph F. Keppler's 'Uncle Sam's lodging-house:' an anti-Irish cartoon. Puck centerfold. (June 7, 1882)A century after Bates wrote “America the Beautiful,” our cities — alabaster and otherwise — aren’t “undimmed by human tears.” But we’re moving in that direction.

We’re learning to accept non-English, non-Protestant Americans.

It’s a lesson we re-learn periodically.

Maybe it’ll get easier, as more Americans have ‘foreign’ names like O’Toole and Einstein, Ichihashi and Karmarkar, Liukin and Chandrasekhar, Di Vincenzo and Pei.

We’ll have more opportunities to learn, at any rate.

“Hair,” the ’60s musical, wasn’t patriotic. Not in the Fabulous Fifties sense.

On the other hand, I think one of its songs expressed a patriot dream of sorts.

“…Harmony and understanding
Sympathy and trust abounding
No more falsehoods or derisions….”
(“Aquarius,” “Hair” (1967))

A half-century later, sympathy and trust aren’t abounding. But wanting harmony and understanding still makes sense.

Working Together

Adimono's 'Sun City.'I don’t expect cities “undimmed by human tears” a century from now.

I’d be astounded if most of humanity’s many problems have been solved in the next millennium. Or ten millennia. We’re dealing with an enormous backlog of unresolved issues.

Healing wounds accumulated over uncounted ages is beyond me.

But I can suggest that justice and charity are good ideas. So is respecting humanity’s “transcendent dignity.” The process starts in me, with an ongoing “inner conversion.” (Catechism, 1886–1889, 1928-1942, 2419-2442)

Owen's 'Avenue Eos.'Maybe, if enough of us start acting as if love matters, we can build a better America.

And a better world.

Imagining alabaster cities abounding in harmony and understanding is easy.

Cobbling together close approximations of them won’t be.

But maybe, if enough of us work together, we can lay foundations for a “…civilization of love, founded on the universal values of peace, solidarity, justice, and liberty….”5

I think we can. I am certain that we must try.

I’ve talked about this before, particularly in 2021 and 2019:


1 Remembering a ‘will-be’ that was:

2 Part of the world I grew up in:

3 A definition:

  • Merriam-Webster dictionary

4 Attitudes:

5 A civilization of love:

Posted in Being Catholic, Discursive Detours | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

History, Viewpoints, Narratives and Ancient Rome

Giovanni Paolo Panini's 'Roma Antica' (1754-1757)
(From Giovanni Paolo Panini, via Staatsgalerie, Stutgard/Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(Giovanni Paolo Panini’s “Ancient Rome” — an 18th century view. (1754-1757))

“…Naiad airs have brought me home
To the glory that was Greece,
And the grandeur that was Rome….”
(“To Helen,” Edgar Allen Poe (1845) via Wikipedia)

I’ve split this week’s post into three sections:

The first is a long-overdue word of thanks to Victor Peters, my first history professor.

Next there’s a look at history, chronology and historiography. Plus an almost-undocumented king, an American president, narratives — and viewpoints, mainstream and otherwise.

After that, finally, comes a metaphorical snapshot or two of ancient Rome.


History 101 and Humanity’s Continuing Story

Peters Papers, special collections, library and archives, Ukrainian Research Institute at Harvard University.
(From Ukrainian Research Institute, Harvard; used w/o permission.)

Professor Peters’ general studies history classes sparked my interest in the subject. He had a talent for showing history as more than a dry catalog of names and dates.1

That, and particularly his account of Alaric’s tomb, led to my earning a degree in history. And inspired my lifelong interest in history.

So — thank you, historian Victor Peters!


About History: Definitions, Documents, and Narratives

The Aristotelian Constitution of Athens, only extant copy of the nearly complete text. Currently at the British Library
(From The British Library, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(The British Library’s Copy of “Constitution of the Athenians,” found in a garbage dump.)

I’ve discussed historical stuff fairly often, but don’t remember talking about history as an academic discipline.

So I’ll do that now. Briefly. For me. Starting with —

Definitions

  • History
    • Dictionary.com
      1. the branch of knowledge dealing with past events
      2. a continuous, systematic narrative of past events as relating to a particular people, country, period, person, etc., usually written as a chronological account
      3. the record of past events and times, especially in connection with the human race
      4. a past notable for its important, unusual, or interesting events
    • Merriam-Webster
      1. tale, story
      2. a chronological record of significant events (such as those affecting a nation or institution) often including an explanation of their causes
      3. the record of past events and times, especially in connection with the human race
      4. a branch of knowledge that records and explains past events
      5. events that form the subject matter of a history
  • Chronology
    • Dictionary.com
      1. the sequential order in which past events occur
      2. a statement of this order
      3. the science of arranging time in periods and ascertaining the dates and historical order of past events
    • Merriam-Webster
      1. the science that deals with measuring time by regular divisions and that assigns to events their proper dates
      2. a chronological table, list, or account a chronology of the author’s works
      3. an arrangement (as of events) in order of occurrence

Basically, history isn’t chronology. But chronology is part of history.

The best definition of history and chronology I’ve seen is this — “The queen died, then the king died” is chronology. “The queen died, therefore the king died” is history.

Maybe that should be “illustration,” not “definition,” and that’s another topic.

More Definitions

I’ve emphasized Dictionary.com’s and Merriam-Webster’s definitions for “narrative” that come up later, under Historical Narratives.

  • Narrative
    • Dictionary.com
      1. a story or account of events, experiences, or the like, whether true or fictitious
      2. a book, literary work, etc., containing such a story
      3. the art, technique, or process of narrating, or of telling a story
      4. a story that connects and explains a carefully selected set of supposedly true events, experiences, or the like, intended to support a particular viewpoint or thesis
    • Merriam-Webster
      1. a) something that is narrated: a story, an account
        b) a way of presenting or understanding a situation or series of events that reflects and promotes a particular point of view or set of values

Just two more definitions, then I’ll start talking about history and related topics.

Historiography
Historiography is the study of the methods of historians in developing history as an academic discipline, and by extension is any body of historical work on a particular subject….
(Historiography, Wikipedia)

metahistory
The overarching narrative or ‘grand récit’ [big story] that gives order and meaning to the historical record, especially in the large-scale philosophies of history of writers such as Hegel, Marx, or Spencer.
(Overview, Oxford Reference)

An Almost-Undocumented King, a President and a Thought Experiment

Daderot's photo: A fragment of the Epic of Etana; Akkadian, Mesopotamia, First Dynasty of Babylon, ca. 1895-1595 B.C. At the Morgan Library and Museum, New York City (February 4, 2020)
From Daderot, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(Part of the Epic of Etana. (ca. 1895-1595 B.C.))

Both history and chronology would be simple, if folks had been keeping records in a consistent format since the time Etana was king of Kish to the present.

And if we’d preserved most of those records.

They didn’t, we haven’t, so today’s scholars figure Etana didn’t really exist. Probably.

I’ll grant Etana’s 1,560 years on the throne sound unbelievable. Or maybe it was 635 years. Different copies of the Sumerian King List have different numbers.

We may never know how much surviving Etana lore describes a real ruler of Kish. If he really had been a ruler of Kish, he’d have lived around 3000 B.C., give or take a few centuries.

Pretty much everything we know about Etana — and Kish — comes from often-incomplete cuneiform documents and other scraps archeologists have uncovered.2

Five millennia later, I’m impressed at how much documentation we haven’t lost.

A Hypothetical Situation: Washington, From a 68th Century Perspective

Detail of 'The Apotheosis of Washington,' United States Capitol rotunda; Constantino Brumidi. (1865)Think about it this way.

George Washington was America’s president from 1789 to 1797.

Two and a quarter centuries later, we still know quite a bit about him.

Partly, I figure, because America’s current language hasn’t changed all that much since the late 18th century. And partly because Washington is an important part of my country’s history.

But we don’t know everything about him. For example, there’s debate over whether he was a Christian, a theistic rationalist, or both. Partly because, I gather, he didn’t name-drop Jesus in his correspondence.

But I’ve yet to run across a serious claim that George Washington wasn’t a real person.

Now let’s imagine our ‘now’ is the late 68th century: five millennia after Washington’s day. That puts America’s first president about as far back for our hypothetical future selves as Etana is for us.

John C. McRae's 'Father, I cannot tell a lie: I cut the tree' engraving.George Washington telling his father Augustine Washington that he cut down the cherry tree. (1867) after a painting by George Gorgas White.And let’s imagine that much of what’s known about Washington is in fragmentary documents dating back to between the 32nd and 35th centuries.

Which is about where we’re at, for stories about Etana. Depending on who’s talking, they’re called the Etana Epic, Legend or Myth.

Adding to the fun, let’s say that those descriptions of George Washington are based on stories derived from a book by Mason Weems, published in 1800.

Hypothetical 68th century scholars might wonder if George Washington had been a real person. Or if he was a mythologized embodiment of Victory and Liberty. Or maybe the North American version of Zeus.3

Historical Narratives

Charles Schreyvogel's 'Tomahawk and sabre; or even odds,' or 'Lieutenant Grummond Sacrificing Himself to Cover the Retreat.' (1902))
(From Charles Schreyvogel, via Wikipedia, used w/o permission.)
(Schreyvogel’s imaginative version of Custer’s Last Stand. (1902))

Historians — professional, amateur and wannabe — have viewpoints. I don’t call it a problem, since it’s what happens when humans act like individuals. Or as groups whose members share common assumptions and beliefs.

But seeing humanity’s story through many eyes does complicate things. And makes quotes like these possible:

“The recognition of the role and importance of subjectivity in the construction of histories does, by implication, negate the possibility for objectivity in the writing of history. But there will always be historical narrative and, consequently, a narrative voice, be it hidden in the syntactical structure of the writing by, for instance, the absence of first person or the use of simple past tense….”
(Dana Arnold, “Reading Architectural History,” Ch. 1 – Reading the past – What is architectural history?, (2002) via Wikiquote [emphasis mine])

“History is not the past but a map of the past, drawn from a particular point of view, to be useful to the modern traveller.”
(Henry Glassie, Passing the Time in Ballymenone (1982)) via Wikiquote

“History is written by the victors.”
(George Graham Vest or somebody else (19th century A.D.)

I grew up when the Battle of the Greasy Grass was called Custer’s Last Stand. These days it’s the Battle of the Little Bighorn.

We’re still trying to figure out exactly what happened.

Which I see as an improvement over what we had before Vine Deloria Jr. wrote “Custer Died for Your Sins.”

I’m also glad that non-academics now have access to details of past events.

Thanks to information age tech. For folks who know how to do research, at any rate. And that can help us separate what happened from imaginative but inaccurate accounts.

Take the saber in Schreyvogel’s picture at ‘Custer’s Last Stand,’ or example. No tomahawk-saber fight happened during the Battle of the Little Bighorn. General Custer, for whatever reason, had told his soldiers to not carry sabers.4

Viewpoints, Mainstream and Otherwise

Excerpt from 'Mamma's Girls,' Chick Publications. (retrieved September 9, 2021)Over the last century or so, we’ve seen manifest destiny — which may have been more a cultural belief than a ‘historiography’ viewpoint — give way to other assumptions.

We’ve had Whig historiography, Marxist historiography, and at least one distinct flavor of progressive historiography.

We’ve also seen imaginative narratives, like Chick Publication’s alternate history. Or what would be alternate history, if Chick tracts were marketed as fiction.5

Simple, But Far From Easy

World Youth Day, Rome. (2000) From Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.Like everyone else, I’ve got a viewpoint.

Before I became a Catholic, I thought truth was important, and that respecting and loving other folks was a good idea.

Now that I’m a Catholic, those aren’t options. They’re obligations. (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 33, 1789, 2196, 2464-2474, 2488-2501)

Loving my neighbors, all my neighbors, comes with being Catholic. Or should. So does seeking truth and respecting “…different religions which frequently ‘reflect a ray of that truth which enlightens all men.’…” And valuing everyone’s religious freedom. (Matthew 5:4344, 22:3640; Mark 12:2831; Luke 6:31 10:2527, 2937, Catechism, 1789, 2104-2109)

Loving my neighbor, seeing everyone as my neighbor, and respecting folks who seek truth, including those who don’t agree with me? Sounds simple. And is incredibly difficult. Which is yet another topic.


Will the Real Ancient Rome Please Stand Up?

Henryk Siemiradzki's 'Roman Orgy in the Time of Caesars.' (1872)
(From Giovanni Paolo Panini, via Staatsgalerie, Stutgard/Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(Henryk Siemiradzki’s “Roman Orgy…” — a 19th century view. (1872))

Cesare Maccari's 'Cicerone denuncia Catilina' 'Cicero Denounces Catiline.' (1889)
(From Giovanni Paolo Panini, via Staatsgalerie, Stutgard/Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(Cesare Maccari’s “Cicero Denounces Catiline” — another 19th century view. (1889))

Remembering ancient Rome as an era of self-indulgent opulence, orgies and decadence may have gone out of fashion.

On the other hand, I haven’t researched the prevalence of orgy remembrances. Still, it’s been a long time since I’ve run across a film like “Up Pompeii.”

At least some of the “Roman decadence” narrative can be credited to Edward Gibbon. His “…Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire” arguably set the tone for 19th and 20th century discussions of the empire’s demise.

“…As the happiness of a future life is the great object of religion, we may hear without surprise or scandal, that the introduction or at least the abuse, of Christianity had some influence on the decline and fall of the Roman empire. The clergy successfully preached the doctrines of patience and pusillanimity: the active virtues of society were discouraged….”
(“History Of The Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire,” Chapter XXXVIII: Reign Of Clovis.-Part VI.; Edward Gibbon, Esq.; With notes by the Rev. H. H. Milman (1782 (Written), 1845 (Revised)) via Gutenberg.org)

I’m not entirely convinced that “pusillanimity,” cowardice and timidity, were preached as Christian virtues in the Roman Empire.

Maybe, after Emperor Constantine decriminalized Christianity. I’ll grant that the Roman Empire was transitioning from a major power to nostalgic memory in Constantine’s day.

But I suspect that Gibbon’s subversive clergy were more a reflection of 18th and 19th century England’s society than the late, great Roman Empire’s.

And maybe Gibbon had taken his cue from Roman historians like Sallust.

“…Good morals, accordingly, were cultivated in the city and in the camp. … Justice and probity prevailed among the citizens. … Citizens contended with citizens in nothing but honor. They were magnificent in their religious services, frugal in their families, and steady in their friendships….”
(“Conspiracy of Catiline and the Jurgurthine War,” Conspiracy of Cataline, IX; Sallust (ca.  43-40 B.C.) trans. The Rev. John Selby Watson, M.A.; via Gutenberg.org)

Good morals, honor and frugal families were — Sallust said — part of Rome’s golden past. Rome, from his viewpoint, had been going bad ever since “…Carthage, the rival of Rome’s dominion, had been utterly destroyed….”

“…At first the love of money, and then that of power, began to prevail, and these became, as it were, the sources of every evil. For avarice subverted honesty, integrity, and other honorable principles, and, in their stead, inculcated pride, inhumanity, contempt of religion, and general venality….”
(“Conspiracy of Catiline and the Jurgurthine War,” Conspiracy of Cataline, X; Sallust (ca.  43-40 B.C.) trans. The Rev. John Selby Watson, M.A.; via Gutenberg.org)

The Catiline trials are also where we get Cicero’s famous “o tempora o mores” lament.6

Now, the Catiline trials happened before Christian subversives allegedly started undermining Roman virtue, but the idea that Christianity broke Rome has been remarkably durable. And that’s yet again another topic.

One more thing before getting to the Horatii, Curiatii, and Roman legend.

Vomitoriums: They’re Not What You Were Told They Were

Norbert Nagel's photo of an amphitheater in Pompeji. (July 10, 2013)
(From Norbert Nagel, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(Pompeii’s amphitheater (spectacul). That’s one of its vomitoria, lower left. (2013))

Vomitoriums really were part of many Roman structures. The Colosseum, for example, seated 87,000 spectators. And had 64 vomitories.

But they were not there to facilitate binge-and-purge eating.

“…Sixty-four vomitories (for by that name the doors were very aptly distinguished) poured forth the immense multitude; and the entrances, passages, and staircases were contrived with such exquisite skill that each person, whether of the senatorial, the equestrian, or the plebeian order, arrived at his destined place without trouble or confusion. Nothing was omitted which, in any respect, could be subservient to the convenience and pleasure of the spectators….”
(“Harpers Dictionary of Classical Antiquities,” Amphitheātrum, Harry Thurston Peck (1898) quoting Gibbon; via Perseus Digital Library, Tufts University

I haven’t confirmed this, but apparently Lewis Mumford’s “The City in History” (1961) said that Roman houses houses routinely included vomitoria. And that the vomitoria’s function was what the English word “vomit” implied.

And that’s another example of something folks know, that just ain’t so.

Maybe there was a Roman-era house with a Mumford-style vomitorium. My guess is that, if so, it was about as typical as the candy room in Markus Persson’s Beverly Hills home.7

Horatii and Curiatii: A Roman Legend

Jacques-Louis David's 'Oath of the Horatii.' (1784)
(From Jacques-Louis David, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(Jacques-Louis David’s “Oath of the Horatii:” — a fine Neoclassical painting. (1784))

In 1784, French politics was coming to a boil. The French Crown controlled spending. But the Estates General was the only agency allowed to approve national taxes, Their last meeting had been in 1614-1615.

I’ve read that artists like Jacques-Louis David were trying to encourage loyalty to the state rather than to clan or clergy. Four years later, the French Revolution happened.

“Oath of the Horatii” illustrates part of a Roman legend, recorded in Livy’s “Ab urbe condita” (“From the Founding of the City” / “The History of Rome”) (ca. 27-9 B.C.)

Livy’s Horatii story is set in the reign of Tullus Hostilius, the legendary third king of Rome.

Assuming that Tullus Hostilius was a real person, he had been king from around 672 to 640 B.C. — and had been fighting his way out of a mess his peaceful predecessor had made. According to Livy’s account, that is.

Livy said that Rome and Alba Longa, a city about 12 miles, 19 kilometers, southeast of Rome, were at war. But Tullus Hostilius figured a full-scale conflict would be a bad idea, since that’d kill a lot of Romans and Alba Longans. “Alba Longans??” That should be Albans.

Anyway, Etruscans would likely attack both Rome and Alba Longa, if the two cities wore themselves out with a war. So Tullus Hostilius and his Alban counterpart agreed that the three Horatii brothers would fight the three Curiatii.8

And the Moral of the Story Is —

Agostino Carracci's 'Aeneas and his family fleeing Troy.' (1595)The Horatii-Curiatii faceoff happened in the mid-seventh century B.C. — assuming that it actually happened.

Seven centuries later, Romans knew the Horatii’s story. But Livy, writing his “Ab urbe condita,” said that who the Horatii and Cuiatii were wasn’t certain.

“…That they were Horatii and Curiatii is generally allowed, and scarcely any other ancient tradition is better known; yet, in spite of the celebrity of the affair, an uncertainty persists in regard to the names —to which people, that is, the Horatii belonged, and to which the Curiatii. The writers of history are divided. Still, the majority, I find, call the Roman brothers Horatii, and theirs is the opinion I incline to adopt….”
(“The History of Rome, Book 1,” 24, Livy (Titus Livius) (ca. 27-9 B.C.) Benjamin Oliver Foster, Ph.D., editor; via Perseus Digital Library, Tufts University)

I suspect part of the problem was that by Livy’s time, distinctions between Roman mythology, folklore and history had gotten blurred.

We’ve seen the same sort of thing happening here in America, although I hope we’ve been a bit more careful about keeping track of what’s real and what’s imaginary. Even so, it took more than half a century to publicize a reality check for Custer’s Last Stand.

Then there’s the matter of the American Puritan image morphing from Pilgrim paragons to fanatical killjoys. There’s a little truth behind both images, and that’s still more topics.

Getting back to Livy’s Horatii story, one of the lessons it taught is that both the Horatii and Curiatii were nobly risking their lives for their country.9 I’m not sure how the surviving Horatii killing his sister because she mourned her Curiatii fiance fits that picture.

“…Neither side thought of its own danger, but of the nation’s sovereignty or servitude, and how from that day forward their country must experience the fortune they should themselves create….”
(“The History of Rome, Book 1,” 25, Livy (Titus Livius) (ca. 27-9 B.C.) Benjamin Oliver Foster, Ph.D., editor; via Perseus Digital Library, Tufts University)

The point of many Roman legends and histories wasn’t so much to give a literally accurate account of historical events, as to showcase Roman virtues.

I think that’s basically a good idea. Although I also think getting the facts straight is vital.

The Tarquin Narrative and Rip Van Winkle

Willem van Nieulandt's 'View of the Forum Romanum.' (ca. 1601-1625)Some academics think the Roman revolution in 509 B.C. — or 501, Roman historians disagreed on the exact year — didn’t happen. Not the way later Roman origin stories described it.

I see their point. Tarquin the Proud’s usurping the throne of Servius Tullius, a popular king — followed by a scandal involving his son and a dead noblewoman — reads like a melodrama. Or maybe an episode of Dallas.

The way I see it, the odds are that Rome was ruled by kings. Maybe seven consecutive kings, although I’m a bit dubious when a count of kings, sons, or cities is one of my civilization’s favorite numbers and that’s — what else? — even more topics.

Maybe the Tarquin narrative is the sort of tale Americans see during some national elections: a narrative where ‘the names you see are true, the events are cherry-picked to get your attention.’

We don’t have documents from the late sixth and early fifth centuries B.C., either supporting the Tarquin tale: or showing that it’s as accurate as Washington Irving’s “Rip Van Winkle.”

So the Tarquin question remains unanswered.10

That said, I’m not ready to disbelieve all of Rome’s “Tarquin” origin story. “Rip Van Winkle,” after all, is fiction: but includes descriptions of real events.

I’ve got more to say about ancient Rome, decadence and social cycle theories. That, and how I see ancient Rome’s gilded moments, will be in my next “Golden Ages” post.

More-or-less related posts:


1 Victor Peters, historian:

2 Remembering Sumer:

3 A thought experiment’s background:

4 People, events and attitudes:

5 asdfasdfasdf:

6 Rome and viewpoints:

7 Vomitoria and Roman architecture:

8 The Horatii and Curiatii, legend and history:

9 Historical perceptions and perspectives:

10 A mixed miscellany:

Posted in Golden Ages, Series | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Trace Signals From an Alien Civilization: Not So FAST?

China's Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope, in Guizhou province.
(From STR/AFP/Getty Images, via NPR, used w/o permission.)
(China’s FAST radio telescope, another eye on the universe since 2016.)

Scientists in China’s Guizhou province have been receiving radio signals from interstellar space since 2016.

Three of these signals may have been from folks who aren’t human, but use radio waves the way we do.

Then again, maybe they weren’t.


Defining “Signal”

Artist's impression of extrasolar planets in the pulsar, PSR B1257+12. (2006) From NASA/JPL-Caltech/R. Hurt (SSC), via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.“Signal,” in this context, is astronomy-speak for radio waves, light, x-rays: anything on the electromagnetic spectrum.

China’s FAST ‘listens’ to the electromagnetic spectrum at wavelengths from 10 centimeters to 4.3 meters. That’s radio communication’s UHF band and not quite half of the VHF band.

At least two sets came from FAST pulsar #1 and #2, or FP1 and FP2. That’s PSR J1859-01 and PSR J1931-02, using a widely-used naming convention. “PSR” stands for Pulsating Source of Radio, the rest gives the pulsar’s location in Earth’s sky.

“PSR” may be an IAU (International Astronomical Unison) pulsar naming convention. But I haven’t confirmed it.

On the one hand, pretty much all pulsars I read about are “PSR-something.” On the other hand, “Pulsating Source of Radio” is a phrase using my native language, English.

Maybe today’s IAU naming convention for pulsars uses my native language for about the same reason that Medieval European scholars wrote their papers in Latin. It’s not an ‘official’ common language, but odds are that a scholar will understand it.

On the other hand, not everybody in the world understands English. So my native tongue is probably a controversial subject. Sometimes, at least.

Which reminds me. FAST is an English-language acronym: Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope.

China’s huge radio telescope’s nickname is Tianyan, 天眼. Google Translate says that’s “eye of the sky.” A Wikipedia page says it’s “Sky’s/Heaven’s Eye.” I’ll call it Sky Eye, mostly because I like the rhyme and rhythm of that nickname.

As of December 16, 2021, Folks at FAST have spotted signals from more than 500 previously-unknown pulsars. According to China’s People’s Daily Online.1 How many of those have been confirmed, that I don’t know.


Narrow-Band Signals From the Stars

China's FAST radio telescope. The 500 meter (1,600 foot) diameter dish is the world's largest filled-aperture radio telescope and the second-largest single-dish aperture, after Russia's RATAN-600. (June 2022)
(From Xinhua/Ou Dongqu, via Live Science, used w/o permission.)

These headlines caught my attention on Wednesday and Friday of last week:

China’s ‘alien’ signal almost certainly came from humans, project researcher says
Ben Turner, Live Science (June 17, 2022)
“Chinese scientists’ claims that their ‘Sky Eye’ telescope could have picked up signals from intelligent aliens have been met with skepticism by an American colleague….”

China says it may have received signals from aliens
Ben Turner, Live Science (June 15, 2022)
“China is claiming that its enormous ‘Sky Eye’ telescope may have picked up trace signals from a distant alien civilization, according to a recently posted and subsequently deleted report by Chinese scientists….”

The “…posted and subsequently deleted…” report may be permanently lost. But I did find something slightly-related on China’s Science and Technology Daily:

  • 搜寻地外文明,’中国天眼’发现可疑信号
    Original 科技日报 科技日报 2022-06-14 02:44
    Posted on 北京
    ◎ 科技日报记者 何星辉
    (Google Translate says this is the citation in English:
    “Searching for extraterrestrial civilization, ‘China Sky Eye’ found suspicious signals”
    Original Science and Technology Daily 2022-06-14 02:44
    Posted on Beijing
    ◎ Science and Technology Daily reporter He Xinghui)

I don’t understand Chinese, so I ran the Science and Technology Daily article through Google Translate. Basically, it says that the “suspicious” signals need more analysis.

There’s more in that article —

The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency’s (JAXA) Hayabusa2 probe collected samples that contained amino acids. And Beijing Normal University; the National Astronomical Observatory of the Chinese Academy of Sciences; and the University of California, Berkeley are setting up a research team that’ll be studying the “suspicious” signals.

More to the point, the signals are “suspicious” — I’m guessing that’s not the best possible translation — because they’re narrow-band signals.2

That’s odd, certainly, but not necessarily proof that they’re artificial.

Stuff that Glows, Masers and Jupiter’s Auroras

Black body radiation curve, Astronomy Education at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.When stuff gets above 977 °F, 525 °C, or so, it starts glowing. Apparently. That’s because our eyes don’t start registering thermal radiation until stuff is that hot.

Scientists call 977 °F, 525 °C, AKA 798 K, the Draper Point. Mainly because John William Draper described it in 1847.

Don’t bother memorizing “798 K” and all that. The point I’m making is that stuff gives off electromagnetic radiation when it’s above absolute zero. And the hotter it is, the more electromagnetic radiation it gives off in higher wavelengths.

Thermal radiation is spread out along the spectrum. It isn’t at just a narrow range of wavelengths. Although stuff that’s hot does have spikes in its emission spectra.

“Maser” stands for Microwave Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. Researchers at Columbia University built the first one in 1953. A maser emits coherent radio waves. Unless it’s one of the newer ones that make infrared waves.

The key word there is “coherent.” A maser’s electromagnetic waves all have the same frequency and are in phase.

Again, stuff glows because it’s hot, it’s glowing across a wide range of wavelengths. If it’s emitting in a narrow band, it’s artificial. Usually.

Unless it’s Jupiter’s north polar auroras. Or a star that’s forming, a supernova remnant interacting with a molecular cloud, or some other naturally-occurring maser.

So a newly-discovered narrow-band radio sources in our VHF or UHF bands might be transmissions from an alien civilization.

Or they’re more naturally-occurring masers — which aren’t, by some standards, really masers because they don’t have oscillation cavities.3 And that’s another topic.


First Contact! — Maybe

(Dióscoro Puebla's 'Primer desembarco de Cristóbal Colón en América,' 'First landing of Christopher Columbus in America.' (1862) From Museo del Prado, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(From Museo del Prado, , via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(A first contact, 1492.)

In 2020, FAST researchers spotted two narrow-band signals in their data.

Then, in 2022, FAST looked — or should that be listened? — toward known exoplanets. And China’s Sky Eye picked up another narrow-band radio signal.

On and near Earth, narrow-band radio signals are pretty much always artificial.

So that’s a total of three possible ‘first contact with extraterrestrial intelligence’ events.

No wonder Someone at FAST got excited. And apparently jumped the gun, posting a “we found ET” report: far ahead of a thorough analysis.

Which I figure is the reason that Science and Technology Daily article of June 14, 2022’s subheading said “Suspicious signal to be further confirmed and ruled out.”

An individual may have leaped far ahead of the data and analysis, but the FAST team seems to be reasonably methodical.

Dan Werthimer is a co-author of the research project which first spotted FAST’s signals.

He told Live Science that those narrow-band radio signals detected by FAST “are from [human] radio interference, and not from extraterrestrials.”

He’s probably right about that, although I haven’t run across anything saying where the narrow-band signals did come from.4

Then Again, Maybe Not

Dickenson V. Alley's staged multiple-exposure photo of Nikola Tesla in his Colorado laboratory. (ca. 1899)If they turn out to be something other than transmissions from an alien civilization, these FAST narrow-band signals won’t be our first false alarm.

Back in 1899, for example, Nicola Tesla told a reporter that he’d picked up odd signals on this experimental radio receiver. And said that the signals might be from another planet.

The press had a field day with Tesla’s letter. Pretty soon, Nicola Tesla was routinely receiving messages from Mars. According to the news.

We still don’t know what Tesla detected. Guglielmo Marconi had been experimenting with a radio transmitter around the time Tesla noticed his odd signal.

Granted, Tesla was in Colorado and Marconi was in Europe. But Marconi’s signal could have traveled that far. Or maybe someone closer to Colorado had been working on a radio transmitter.5 We don’t know.

Pulsars: Navigation Beacons?

NASA's illustration of a pulsar's planet. (ca. 2018)In 1967, at Cambridge, Jocelym Bell Burnell spotted a powerful, rapid and very regular radio pulse.

CP 1919 (Cambridge Pulsar at RA 19h 19m) had a pulse frequency of 1.3373 seconds and a pulse width of 0.04 seconds.

Pulsars were puzzling.

No known natural phenomenon could pulse that fast and put out that much power. Make that no natural phenomenon known in 1967.

Some scientists said that pulsars might be beacons: navigation aids. We didn’t, and don’t, know of any galaxy-spanning civilization. But, at the time, we we didn’t know how a natural phenomenon that powerful could emit pulses that lasted hundredths of a second.

Speculating that pulsars could be beacons fit the known facts. Particularly when more pulsars were spotted, spread across our galaxy, each pulsing at a different rate.

Then we learned more about pulsars, found some that changed their pulse rate, and realized that they were a particular sort of collapsed star.

With 20-20 hindsight, I could make fun of scientists who said that pulsars might be a galaxy-spanning civilization’s navigation beacons. But I won’t.

At least one pointed out that even if they turned out to be a natural phenomenon, they could be used as beacons.6

That possibility still exists. How probable it is? That’s another question, for another day.

Wow!

Big Ear Radio Observatory and North American AstroPhysical Observatory (NAAPO)'s 'Wow!' signal printout. A scan of a color copy of the original computer printout, taken several years after the August 15, 1977 'Wow!' signal's arrival. Astronomer Jerry R. Ehman noticed the signal several days after its arrival, and wrote the 'Wow!' comment. From Ohio History Connection, via Wikipedia, used w/o permission.Ohio State University’s Big Ear radio telescope picked up a strong narrow-band radio signal for 72 seconds on August 15, 1977.

The telescope was pointed toward the constellation Sagittarius, so that’s almost certainly where the signal came from.

Nearly 45 years later, we know of several natural phenomena that might, maybe, have produced the Wow! signal. And at least one that wouldn’t have. But nobody’s demonstrated that one of the ‘could have’ explanations is a ‘very likely was’ solution.

In 2020, Alberto Caballero found a sun-like star in the Gaia archive that might be the Wow! signal’s source. Not the star, probably: but a planet circling the star that we haven’t spotted yet.

The star’s designation is 2MASS 19281982-2640123. It’s in Sagittarius, and about 18,000 light-years out.

If — and it’s a big “if” — the Wow! signal was artificial, it didn’t carry a message. Probably.

At least, it wasn’t modulated. Not in any way we can detect. And, despite at least 50 efforts to detect the same signal, Wow! hasn’t been repeated.7

Alien Megastructure, Lumpy Asteroid Field, or Something Else

JohnPassos: all KIC 8462852 light curve data from December 2009 to May 2013 (scan days 0066 - 1587), Kepler data only. (chart prepare January 30, 2016) via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.In September 2015, folks with the Planet Hunters project posted a report about KIC 8462852, Tabby’s Star. It was flickering, irregularly, as if something big and lumpy was in orbit around it.

Or maybe KIC 8462852 was a really weird variable star. That didn’t seem likely, so researchers said maybe Tabby’s star had a lumpy ring of dust orbiting it. Or maybe an lumpy asteroid field.

Or, some suggested, maybe somebody had built a very big orbital structure there. Something, maybe, along the lines of the ISS: but on a bigger-than-planetary scale.

Or maybe an exomoon had gotten loose in Tabby’s Star’s planetary system and then got knocked to pieces.8

The last I heard, there still isn’t a consensus on just what’s happening around, on or in Tabby’s Star. But the odds are that whatever it is, it’s a natural phenomenon. We think.


Coming Soon(ish): SETI and Technosignatures that Weren’t

Percival Lowell's Martian 'canals.' (before 1914)
(From Percival Lowell, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(Lowell’s Martian “canals;” from “Distant Worlds,” Yakov Perelman (1914))

Astronomers have spotted many more phenomena that might have been evidence of extraterrestrial civilizations. But weren’t.

The gold standard for false alarms is, arguably, Powell’s Martian canals.

I’d planned on talking about Lowell’s canals, the 2019 BLC1 signal which may or may not have come from Proxima Centauri’s planetary system, perytons from an observatory’s break room, and FRBs: Fast Radio Bursts.

By the time I’d gotten to “Stuff that Glows, Masers and Jupiter’s Auroras,” I realized that breaking this post into less massive chunks might be a good idea.

Then household and family stuff happened, and there’s no more time this week. So I’ve made and saved notes, and figure I’ll make this a ‘to be continued’ post.

I’ve got more to discuss than false alarms. For one thing, someone’s written a paper about the odds that space aliens will be hostile.

A quick glance told me that his speculation was less bleak than I’d expected, and that’s yet another topic for — as I said before, another time.

But maybe not next week. It’s been a month since I’ve added to my Golden Ages series.

Finally, here’s the usual collection of links:


1 China’s Sky Eye and signals from the stars:

2 An asteroid, a spaceship and amino acids:

3 More than you need, or maybe want, to know about:

4 Signals, yes; artificial, maybe not:

5 Radio, and a colorful character:

6 Pulsars:

7 Decades later, still intriguing:

8 Observation and speculation:

Posted in Exoplanets and Aliens, Series | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Wagner, Servant of Faustus: What’s He Doing in the Play?

John Norden's map of London, from 'Speculum Britanniae. The first parte. An historicall and chronographicall description of Middlesex.' (1593) via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.

I’d like to say that my ‘Marlowe’s Faustus’ series follows some grand scheme, marching down a well-organized path toward a profound conclusion. But it doesn’t, so I won’t.

I started re-reading Christopher Marlowe’s “The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus,” a little bit at a time, a year and a half ago. My idea was to polish and re-post a “Faustus” series I’d done back in 2012.

George Vertue's Procession portrait of Elizabeth I of England with the Knights of the Garter. (ca. 1601) from Sotheby's, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.That’s not what happened.

Instead, I’ve been talking about Elizabethan politics and demons, folklore and myth. And, briefly, both Renaissance magic and Renaissance science.

Renaissance science and magic were a tad jumbled, at least from a 21st-century viewpoint. And that’s another topic.1

This week, I’ll glance at the role Wagner, Doctor Faustus’ servant, fills in Marlowe’s play.

After putting Marlowe’s England and Germany’s ‘Faust’ folklore in perspective.


Bankside: Elizabethan Era Entertainment District

John Norden's map of London, from 'Speculum Britanniae....' Detail, Bankside. (1593) via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.

The Rose Theater in Bankside is famous for being at first in at least two categories.

It apparently was the first purpose-built theater featuring one of Shakespeare’s plays. And the first playhouse (“The play howse” on that 1593 map) in Bankside.

Bankside’s name goes back to 1554, when “the Banke syde” meant “street along the bank.” Which makes sense, since it’s a divot of land on the Thames near Southwark Bridge.

The Rose was on the northwest corner of Southwark Bridge Road and Park Streets. That’s what they’re called these days, at any rate. Southwark Bridge wouldn’t be built until 1819.

The Rose theater opened for business in 1587. Maybe Marlowe’s “Faustus” was staged there the same year, or maybe not.

In May of 1591, some of Richard Burbage’s acting company, The Lord Chamberlain’s Men, formed another company, The Lord Admiral’s Men. Why, I don’t know. The earliest documented run of “Faustus” — probably at the Rose — started on September 30, 1594.

Then, in 1599, The Lord Chamberlain’s Men built the Globe theater on the southeast corner of today’s Southwark Bridge Road and Park Streets.

A few years passed. Economic pressure, politics, Puritans and England’s Privy Council put the Rose out of business; sometime around 1600.

The Globe burned in 1613, was rebuilt in 1614 and finally closed by the Long Parliament in 1642. Because stage plays were immoral.

According to the Long Parliament.2

The Bear Howse, Casinos and the “Immorality of English Stage”

Jeremy Collier's 'Short View of the Immorality and Profaneness of the English Stage' antitheatrical pamphlet. (1698)In 1698, five and a half decades after the Long Parliament’s 1642 London theatre closure, theater critic, non-juror bishop and theologian Jeremy Collier was trying to save England from Shakespeare’s Ophelia.

He almost had a point.

Back in the 1580s and ’90s, Bankside was what we’d call an entertainment district.

A venue called “The Bear Howse” on that 1593 map was near The Rose, and a building on the Rose property may have been sublet as a brothel. If so, it wasn’t the only one in the neighborhood.

“The Bear howse” was a place for bear-baiting. It was both legal and popular back then.3

So were “gaming dens:” We call them casinos these days. I’m not sure what the Elizabethan term was.

But were “the Bear howse,” casinos, brothels, and theaters really dens of iniquity?

I don’t know where prostitution fits on today’s propriety spectrum.

Old-Fashioned Values

Carl Hassmann's 'The Almightier' illustration for Puck. (May 15, 1907)Back in my day, serious folks insisted that prostitution should be legal: because it’s a good way for women to make money.

I know, but that was a popular argument in some circles. Decades back now.

My oldest daughter says she still runs into the ‘but it makes money’ argument.

So it looks like American opinion is still split on whether human or dollar values matter more.

“…Creature comfort goals,

they only numb my soul
And make it hard for me to see…”
(“Pleasant Valley Sunday” The Monkees (1967))

“I’ll lie, cheat, steal for this company … but I will not give up my integrity.
I feel that a man is of value to the organization as long as he….”
Brigadoon” (1954) (via springfieldspringfield.co.uk))

I realize that money matters. Particularly when I’m running short.

But when I was young, I didn’t see a point in buying stuff I don’t need with money I don’t have to impress folks I don’t like. I still don’t. And that’s yet another topic.

Animals, Gambling and Human Dignity

William Hogarth's 'The Second Stage of Cruelty, detail. (1751) see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Four_Stages_of_CrueltyMy view of bear-baiting and all that?

I’m a Catholic. I figure that cruelty to animals, bear-baiting included, is a bad idea and we shouldn’t do it. (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2415-2418)

Gambling isn’t a problem. As long as it’s not a problem. What’s called gambling addiction? That’s a problem. (Catechism, 2413)

Prostitution, along with pornography, is a bad idea and we shouldn’t do it. Human beings are people, even when we’re treated as if we were objects. And treating a person as if he or she is an object is an offense against human dignity. (Catechism, 2354-2355)

Stage plays? Yeah. I’ll grant that some stage plays, and movies, don’t show respect for human dignity.

But I’ve yet to find either on an official Catholic ‘don’t do this’ list. Individual Catholics can be as crackers as anyone else, and that’s yet again another topic.


Faust! Featured in Folklore, Film and Video Games!

Theatrical poster for a performance of Goethe's play: 'Lewis Morrison as 'Mephistopheles' in Faust! (1887)
(Mephistopheles conjuring spooks in Goethe’s “Faust.” (1887))

Germany’s ‘Faust’ folklore and legend, based loosely on Johann Georg Faust’s posthumous reputation, got traction with chapbooks in the 1580s.

Frontispiece of 'Historia von D. Johan Fausten,' published by Johann Spies. (1587)Since then, it’s inspired Wagner’s “Faust Overture” and four films that I’ve found, probably more.

It’s been the libretto for at least three operas, and the plot for plays by Marlowe and Goethe.

I’ve read that Marlowe’s “Doctor Faustus” mirrors “mainstream Christianity,” which might explain the English-speaking world’s fascination with Faust.

“Dr. Faustus: Movement into the Renaissance”
Harlie; First-Year Preceptorial — Forbidden Knowledge; Union College, Professor Watkins (October 15, 2013)
“Dr. Faustus was written in the Renaissance and therefore represents how to be a good Christian. As a character, Dr. Faustus is not a good Christian. But he teaches readers of the time what they shouldn’t do. Faustus is showing the way not to die; if you live life as a good Christian and avoid the devil and temptation then you will go to heaven….”

“Teaching Doctor Faustus Through the Ars Moriendi Tradition”
Matthew Fike, The CEA Forum (Winter/Spring 2008)
“The rough edges in Christopher Marlowe’s intellectual life serve as a foil to the mainstream Christianity in Doctor Faustus: the playwright had a reputation for atheism or at least for unorthodox opinions; papers allegedly found in a writing room that he shared with Thomas Kyd….”

But that may not explain multiple Fausts popping up in anime, video games and comics.4

My guess is that the Faust legend has been so lastingly popular because it’s a rousing tale, one which lets actors and authors chew the scenery without seeming overeager.

As for the Marlowe “Faustus” presenting mainstream Christianity — I’d say that depends on which mainstream is in play, and that’s still another topic.


Wagner, Scholars, and a Stock Character

John Tenniel's 'Whenever the horse stopped (which it did very often), he fell off in front...' illstration for 'Alice's Adventures in Wonderland' (1871) via Wikisource and Wikimedia commons, used w/o permission.I’ve gathered that literary critics have occasionally deplored comedy relief in serious thespian productions.

Part of the problem, I suspect, was that the groundlings enjoyed a break from grimly philosophical ruminations.

I see the critics’ point, particularly if they think of themselves as scholars.

Take this bit from Marlowe’s “Faustus,” for example. It’s Wagner’s second appearance, and the first time he gets more than a few lines.

“…SECOND SCHOLAR. That shall we presently know; here comes his boy.

Enter WAGNER.

FIRST SCHOLAR. How now, sirrah! where’s thy master?

WAGNER. God in heaven knows.

SECOND SCHOLAR. Why, dost not thou know, then?

WAGNER. Yes, I know; but that follows not.

FIRST SCHOLAR. Go to, sirrah! leave your jesting, and tell us where he is.

WAGNER. That follows not by force of argument, which you, being licentiates, should stand upon: therefore acknowledge your error, and be attentive.

SECOND SCHOLAR. Then you will not tell us?

WAGNER. You are deceived, for I will tell you: yet, if you were not dunces, you would never ask me such a question….”
(“…Faustus…,” Marlowe (1604, From The Quarto Of 1616) Edited by The Rev. Alexander Dyce (1870))

I’ve seen this dialog called “Wagner’s mock disputation with the scholars….”

Mock it may have been, but I think Wagner made a valid point.

Either or both scholars should have noticed that Wagner’s “God in heaven knows” — although often taken to mean ‘I do not know’ — does not say, when the words are taken in their non-colloquial sense, whether or not the speaker knows whatever is being asked.

But they didn’t, and I am not going to fall down a rabbit hole of logic and semantics, metalanguage, the White Knight and Alice.5 Not today, at any rate.

Instead, I’ll glance at Wagner’s role in Marlowe’s play.

Labeling Wagner

A. Wallis Mills' illustration for 'Jeeves in the Springtime,' P. G. Wodehouse, in The Strand magazine. (1921) from Madame Eulalie’s Rare Plums via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.Depending on which student guide you’re reading, Wagner is “the inferior student of the masterful doctor,” someone who “banters foolishly with the Scholars about philosophy” or is “wily, cunning, and more than a little devious.”

All of which are arguably accurate, particularly if one of them is your professor’s pet idea.

But I suspect that Wagner — along with Palaestrio in “Miles Gloriosus,” Jeeves and Haroud Hazi Bin of the Disney Aladdin series — is another version of Roman theater’s servus callidus: the clever/tricky slave.

The servus callidus, who’s sometimes a dolosus servus (deceitful servant), has been used by writers from Plautus to Wodehouse: and Plautus had been using the ancient Greek theater’s playbook.

Slavery, by the way, is a bad idea and we shouldn’t do it. The problem, again, is personal dignity. (Catechism, 2414)

So I’ll say “clever servant,” not servus callidus.

The clever servant’s socioeconomic position is below that of his or her master/boss, but the boss — consciously or not — depends on the servant’s brains. Or gets manipulated by the anything-but-inferior underling.6

After reading that “if you were not dunces” dialog, or should it be trialog? Never mind, and moving along.

Anyway, after reading that bit, I think Wagner might be a cunning servant in Marlowe’s “Faustus.” But I’m not sure.

I haven’t read through the play for years, and don’t remember Wagner’s subplot. So I’ll have to keep an eye on Wagner to see just how smart he is. And whether or not his actions support my notion that he’s the play’s clever servant.

Then there’s the question of how wise either Wagner or Faustus are. I’d say ‘not very,’ but that’s — you guessed it — another topic for another time.

More, and maybe less, related posts:


1 Natural philosophy, before it was science:

2 Renaissance, mostly:

3 Tudor England and troubled times:

4 Faust: chapbooks, plays, films and more:

John Tenniel's illustration, frontispiece for Lewis Carroll's 'Through the Looking Glass:' White Knight and Alice. (1871)5 Down the rabbit hole, through the looking glass; and a little serious scholarship:

6 A stock character with deep roots:

Posted in Marlowe's Faustus, Series | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment