Derek Chauvin, a police officer, killed George Floyd about a month ago.
I don’t know whether a court will call that homicide a murder, or assign some other label. I do know that there was and is no apparent excuse for ending Mr. Floyd’s life.
Floyd-themed protests started in Minneapolis, went national and then international.
I suspect that stress and isolation associated with the COVID-19 pandemic inspires at least some protestors, arsonists, vandals and looters. And that’s a can of worms I may open another day. Or maybe not.
- News and Views
- A Drive-Through Nap
- Duality and Death
- St. Cloud, Minnesota: An Arrest, Social Media and Riots
- Fear and NASCAR Flags
- Freudian Slips, a “Cavalier” Comment
Including a California sheriff’s deputy and Rayshard Brooks, who has achieved posthumous fame.
- “What we know about the police shooting of Rayshard Brooks at Wendy’s parking lot in Atlanta”
Jason Braverman, 11Alive (June 15, 2020)
- “Atlanta police seek suspect who set Wendy’s on fire in Rayshard Brooks unrest”
NewsRadio WGMD (June 14, 2020)
- “Deputy killed, two officers wounded while pursuing Air Force sergeant in California, officials said”
Martha Mendoza, Associated Press; via USA Today (June 7, 2020)
- “Santa Cruz Sheriff’s Deputy Killed, 2 Injured in Gunfire and IED Ambush”
Khaleda Rahman, Newsweek (June 7, 2020)
- “Santa Cruz deputy killed in ‘ambush’”
KTVU FOX 2 (June 6, 2020)
I’d also prefer that the Wendy’s where Mr. Brooks’s arrest went awry not have been torched.
The police version of what happened isn’t flattering to any of the parties involved.
Apart, maybe, from whoever decided to ask for help clearing a vehicle and its inert operator from the drive-thru lane.
I’ll assume that folks working at fast-food eateries generally aren’t trained or equipped to handle what might be a medical emergency or DUI incident. And that Atlanta’s police officers are.
Alcohol may have been a significant factor in the Atlanta debacle. I’ve talked about temperance, moderation, “Reefer Madness” and getting a grip before. (July 10, 2016)
Someone who’s taking a nap while parked in a drive-through might be drunk. Or might be experiencing a medical event, like hypoglycemia.
It apparently took Atlanta officers several minutes to rouse Mr. Brooks. That would arguably support the assumption that something was amiss with him.
His watery eyes, slurred speech and cooperative but none-too-consistent behavior suggested that he’d had more than ‘maybe one-and-a-half’ drinks.
That, and his apparent decision to take a nap in a drive-through is probably why the responding officers gave him a breathalyzer test. That would help them determine whether he was drunk, or running dangerously low on blood sugar.
Atlanta’s legal limit for blood alcohol is 0.08. Mr. Brooks’ breathalyzer test result was 0.108, a bit above legal but not all that much.
It might, however, help explain why Mr. Brooks decided to take one of the responding officer’s Tazer. What’s less obvious, at least to me, is how a slightly-sozzled chap could steal a police officer’s Tazer: while the officer was holding it.
Maybe it’d be more obvious if I saw a video of the incident. Or maybe not.
What happened next varies, according to who’s telling the tale. Which, I gather, is par for the course in eyewitness accounts.
What’s more certain is that Mr. Brooks was shot in the back, twice. And then he died.
Some of the bad news is that Mr. Brooks is dead.
The good news, and I’m not saying it’s particularly good, is that the powers that be in Atlanta seem to be acting as if killing Mr. Brooks was a bad idea.1
“Santa Cruz deputy’s accused killer scrawled message in blood, witnesses say”
Amy Larson, KRON4 (June 8, 2020)
“…The suspect, Air Force Sgt. Steven Carrillo, ‘is an angry man,’ Hart said. ‘His actions alone said a lot about him. He used to very heavy weapon to shoot our deputies. And threw incendiary devices. He was very intent on killing these police officers,’ [Sheriff Jim] Hart said….
“…While Carillo was still on the run and bleeding, he apparently scrawled a message in blood on the back of the white sedan that he fled in, photographs sent by a witness to KRON4 show.
“One message says, ‘Stop The Duality.’ The second message is illegible.
“Carrillo was also heard yelling ‘stop the duality’ in a cellphone video recorded as he was being led away in handcuffs by deputies. He’s also recorded berating the deputies during his arrest, telling them, ‘This is why I’m sick of these god d**n police. This is what I’m sick of.’…
“…One witness, Mark Kowalski, said he talked to Carrillo as he was hiding from deputies during the manhunt. Kowalski was working at Redwood Coast Dispensary off Highway 9 when he heard that a deputy had just been shot and the gunman was at large. When he walked outside, he found himself face-to-face with Carrillo.
“Kowalski said, ‘He looked and me and I looked at him. He said, “I’m not a bad guy. I’m just sick of all the duality bullsh*t.”‘…”
I generally keep my ‘in the news’ excerpts short.
But San Francisco’s KRON4 reporter quoted a sheriff, a witness/participant, and the suspect involved in the June 6, 2020, incident.
That’s three viewpoints under one headline. Going over my usual limit seemed like a good idea. Your experience may vary.
“Chief, community leaders praise officer for not using deadly force in St. Cloud shooting”
Diane Sandberg, KARE11 (June 15, 2020)
“The St. Cloud Chief of Police, the head of the St. Cloud NAACP and the local faith community are praising an officer for not using deadly force in a Monday morning arrest.
“St. Cloud Police say that just after midnight, two officers were trying to stop and detain an 18-year-old man. He ran, and police caught him in the 1000 block of 10th Ave. South. Police believed the suspect had a firearm.
“Police say the man resisted arrest, and during a physical struggle with officers the suspect produced a handgun and fired it once. The arresting officer was struck in the hand….”
St. Cloud, Minnesota, isn’t just like Minneapolis or Atlanta. Or Sauk Centre, the town I call home. But it’s not all that different, either.2
Some folks act badly in all four. Occasionally.
I figure that’s why we have police departments.
I’m also quite sure that some folks would act badly even if we abolished our police.
And that police departments aren’t mainly staffed by homicidal bigots waiting for an excuse to slay someone.
I figure that’s true pretty much everywhere.
And I figure most police officers aren’t apt to commit random homicide.
Or non-random homicide.
Otherwise, incidents like the Floyd and Brooks killings would be routine, barely worth putting on a newspaper’s back pages.
I also think we’re not all good citizens. Not all the time, at any rate.
And some of us apparently prefer rumors to facts, presenting ersatz facts as the real deal.
“…In a Monday morning press conference, Chief Anderson noted one of the reasons for speaking was what he referred to as ‘that devil,’ social media.
“A video circulated on social media Monday morning claiming that two black teenagers had been fatally shot by St. Cloud Police….”
(Diane Sandberg, KARE 11 (June 15, 2020))
I didn’t hear the Monday morning press conference, and haven’t seen a transcript, so I don’t know the context of Chief Anderson’s “that devil” statement.
I could assume that he condemned all social media. Then I could rant about free speech, bias, censorship and technophobia.
Or I could compose a bitter screed against those who spread falsehoods, inciting chaos and destruction.
Or claim that Chief Anderson and the rumormongers were in cahoots. Or that they’re minions of the Illuminati-Leprechaun-Pixie Alliance: ILPA. (Which is fictional, made up, not real.)
But I figure there’s no sense in adding more sound and fury to the verbal fewmets being flung. Although ILPA could be a catchy acronym. And that’s another topic.
Next, I’ll indulge in two more excerpts from the news. One of them’s longish.
My excuse this time is that the KSTP article describes some of Monday night’s events, and that KNSI’s summarizes events related to the Monday morning arrest.
“2nd night of unrest in St. Cloud after social media rumors, 40 arrested”
KSTP (June 16, 2020)
“…This all began early Monday, after an incident in which a police officer was shot in the hand and an 18-year-old was arrested….
“…Police said, at about 10:20 p.m., officers responded to a report of multiple gunshots in the area of Ninth Avenue and University Drive. Multiple people fled the area when officers arrived but police didn’t locate any victims. While they investigated, people began gathering in the area.
“By 10:50 p.m., police estimated about 200 people were gathered and were blocking traffic. Officers also saw people throwing rocks at officers and passing vehicles.
“At 11 p.m., police said some people began breaking the front door glass of Southtown Liquor and looting the store. Officers stepped in to stop those individuals and also gave the crowd a mandatory notice to disperse….”
That was Tuesday, June 16.
And now, Friday’s news.
“St. Cloud Officer Shot ID’d”
Jake Judd, KNSI (June 19, 2020)
“…The arrest of the 18-year-old led to false social media rumors that police shot two black men.
“Those rumors led two several nights of rioting in St. Cloud resulting in damage to several businesses, the police department, and the Community OutPost….”
It’s not all bad news.
Nobody, as far as I’ve heard, has been killed in St. Cloud’s post-arrest riots.
The police officer with a wounded hand left St. Cloud Hospital on Monday. He’s “on standard paid administrative leave.” The Monday morning incident is being investigated.
I don’t know who started the ‘cops killed two blacks’ rumors, or what the motive was.
It could have been a St. Cloud University student who thought it’d be funny.
Or someone who really believed that St. Cloud police had committed murder.
Or someone with another motive.
News hasn’t been all bad lately. Some of it’s been simply weird.
Or potentially embarrassing.
“Bubba Wallace: ‘No crime committed’ as FBI ends noose investigation”
BBC News (23 June 2020)
“The noose found in Nascar driver Bubba Wallace’s garage on Sunday was actually a handle on a garage door and had been there since last year, an FBI investigation concluded.
“It added that ‘no federal crime was committed’.
“Wallace, the sole full-time black driver in Nascar, successfully pushed to ban the Confederate flag from races.
“Nascar said it was ‘thankful to learn that this was not an intentional, racist act against Bubba’….”
I can’t say that I blame NASCAR officials for banning racist flags from their event.
And their expressions of thanksgiving, upon learning that the garage door handle crisis wasn’t intentionally racist.
My hat’s also off to Mr. Wallace, for praising NASCAR’s decisions.
I’m not sure what to think about other responses.
- “Bubba Wallace praises NASCAR’s Confederate flag ban but one driver says he’s quitting over decision”
CBS News (June 11, 2020)
Folks at or near the fringe of various political continua can’t be expected to refrain from the occasional violent outburst.
That’s not an excuse for mayhem, and that’s yet another topic.
Mr. Wallace’s ancestry and Floyd-inspired activity would reasonably suggest that a threat had been made.
It’s as if a doctor attending a 1955 vaccination conference found a “FIGHT COMMUNISTIC WORLD GOVERNMENT” flier in his hotel room.
The hypothetical doctor might reasonably regard it as a threat.
And hypothetical 1955 conference organizers might reasonably decide to ask for a full investigation. Of the doctor. If for no other reason than to avoid being blacklisted.
Times change. We don’t, quite, have a contemporary equivalent of the HUAC.3 I see that as a good thing.
Next, news from June 22 and 25, 2020, and NASCAR’s noose.
(From NASCAR/Reuters, via BBC News, used w/o permission.)
(“The photo released by Nascar of the noose at the team garage used by Bubba Wallace during the Geico 500 at Talladega” (Motorsport, BBC News (June 25, 2020)))
“FBI investigating noose found in garage of black US racing driver”
BBC News (June 22, 2020)
“The FBI and the US Justice Department are investigating the discovery of a noose in the garage stall of African-American race car driver Bubba Wallace.…
“…The news follows Nascar’s own pledge to investigate the ‘heinous’ act.
“In a statement, the US-based organisation condemned the act at Talladega Superspeedway in Alabama….”
Three days later, NASCAR’s president says they did the right thing.
“Bubba Wallace: Nascar president said it was right to fear hate crime”
Motorsport, BBC News (June 25, 2020)
“Nascar said it was right to fear a hate crime had been committed against driver Bubba Wallace, which was later dismissed after an FBI investigation.…
“… ‘Upon learning of and seeing the noose, our reaction was to protect Bubba,’ said Nascar president Steve Phelps.
“‘We’re living in a highly charged and emotional time.’…”
NASCAR’s Steve Phelps saying that his outfit acted properly makes sense. And I think he’s right about this being “a highly charged and emotional time.”
I also don’t blame Mr. Wallace for assuming that a loop he saw in a garage was a racist threat.
There’s been a mess of angst in news and op-ed pieces, telling Americans that racism is rampant and we should all feel scared and/or guilty.
And some of us have personal, family or cultural reasons for heightened caution.
I’m not sure what to make of the photo. Maybe it’s my marketing background, but the Kroger truck’s presence reminds me of product placement. That, and the Talladega curse, are more topics.4
A currently-noteworthy American politico may eventually become as famous for his gaffes as for his achievements.
And for getting, or being put, back on his feet after tripping over his slips.
“Biden regrets saying black voters considering Trump ‘ain’t black’”
US Election 2020, BBC News (May 23, 2020)
“Democratic White House candidate Joe Biden is in damage limitation mode after saying African Americans ‘ain’t black’ if they even consider voting for President Donald Trump over him.
“Gaffe-prone Mr Biden made the remark in an interview on Friday with a prominent black radio host, Charlamagne Tha God, about his outreach to black voters.
“Mr Biden later expressed regret for the ‘cavalier’ comment….”(emphasis on lead paragraph BBC’s, their typical format.)
I’ll accept Mr. Biden’s description of his “ain’t black” comment as “cavalier.” The “disdain” sense of the word. I don’t think anyone seriously believes that Mr. Biden supports England’s Charles I. Not many folks, at least.
I also suspect that Mr. Biden inadvertently expressed a perhaps-unconscious belief that a particular voting block belonged to him and his party. Maybe.
On the other hand, I can’t tell what’s going on inside another person’s head. All I can do is see what comes out. See, hear, observe, whatever.
- “Liberal groups slam Biden’s response to police protest movement, warning he risks losing support from black voters”
Annie Linskey, Politics, Washington Post (June 15, 2020)
- “Biden regrets saying black voters considering Trump ‘ain’t black’”
US Election 2020, BBC News (May 23, 2020)
- “Joe Biden says voters ‘ain’t black’ if they support Trump”
CNN (May 22, 2020)
(From New York World-Telegram and the Sun staff photographer C. M. Stieglitz, via Library of Congress and Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(Robert Thompson and Benjamin J. Davis: accused of improper political views. (1949))
Back in my teens, expressing McCarthyism’s version of moral panic was a badge of honor among ‘real Americans.’
Their alternatively-rational rants encouraged me to admire communism.
I still think that ideology looks good. On paper. It might even work, in a society formed by folks who aren’t human. Maybe intelligent analogs to naked mole rats or ants. I’ll get back to that in another post.
Then the 1968 invasion of Czechoslovakia happened. That’s where the Czech Republic and Slovakia are now, and I’m drifting off-topic.
Where was I? Let me think. George Floyd. Riots. Rayshard Brooks. More riots. NASCAR. An arguably-Freudian slip. Remembering the ‘good old days’ that weren’t. Right.
The 1949-1958 Smith Act trials of Communist Party leaders were not among America’s shining moments. But it wasn’t all bad news. In 1957, the U.S. Supreme Court said that folks can be prosecuted for what they do, but not for what they believe.5
Times change. So have the establishment’s quirks. Exposing alleged communists is out, denouncing alleged racists is in.
But I think it’s not all that different, either.
“Ben Carson: Society Needs To ‘Grow Up’ And Stop Being Offended By Everything”
Tim Hains, RealClearPolitics (June 14, 2020)
“BEN CARSON: You know, we’ve reached a point in our society where we dissect everything and try to ascribe some nefarious notion to it. We really need to move away from that. We need to move away from being offended by everything, of going through history and looking at everything, you know, of renaming everything — I mean, think about the fact that some of our universities, some of our prestigious universities, have a relationship with the slave trade. Should we go and rename those universities?”
“WATCH: Ben Carson Says People Should ‘Grow Up’ and Stop Being Offended”
Todd Neikirk HillReporter.com (June 14, 2020)
“Trump nominated Dr. Carson to head Housing and Urban Development prior to being inaugurated. With the high level of turnover in the Trump White House, the Doctor is both loyal and long-tenured. The former neurosurgeon displayed that loyalty on Sunday morning when he defended Trump by saying people get offended too easily….
“…Democratic lawmaker Stacey Abrams appeared on the show following Carson’s appearance. When asked about his comments, she said, ‘This isn’t about growing up. It’s about taking responsibility and having accountability for the actions that have been taken by this country and by people acting on behalf of this country. And we do have a day of reckoning and that day of reckoning is going to continue until we actually make change.’…”
Taking offense at HillReporter.com’s presentation is an option. But probably not a reasonable one. Neikirk, Abrams and all have an election year’s politics to consider.
And “day of reckoning” rhetoric aside, acting responsibly is a good idea.
Maybe I should have said this earlier.
(U.S. Army photo by Charles E. Spirtos, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(Military police from the Texas Army National Guard’s 136th MEB supporting local law enforcement in Austin. (May 30, 2020))
There have been considerably more than “a thousand people in the street” since May 26, 2020.
But they’re mostly like the folks in Buffalo Springfield’s “For What It’s Worth:” carrying signs that say “hooray for our side.”
That’s not a bad thing, by itself.
Holding a sign saying “down with our side?” That would be disturbing. And still another topic.
If I were carrying a sign, I’d prefer that the slogan make sense to me, and to folks who aren’t on the same page as I am.
Being short and easily readable would be nice, too.
They’re still daily headline news.
I don’t know if that’s good news or bad news. Maybe a bit of both.
But arson and looting have been noticeably lacking in most of the ones I’ve read about.
I’ll take that as good news.
“Arson and looting?” Maybe I should have said looting and arson. Setting a store on fire and then collecting free samples doesn’t strike me as practical. And that’s — you guessed it — another topic.
Protests, those considered newsworthy at any rate, have been sticking to the ‘some lives matter’ and ‘abolish police’ themes. With individual exceptions. Like the fellow holding a “black / queer / proud” sign.
Maybe someone’s done an analysis of Floyd-themed protest signs.
I haven’t, and probably won’t. Doing it right would mean digging into source material used by reporters and editors: not just the items they picked out. And collecting data on protests they didn’t cover.
That would require resources I don’t have, and time I’m unwilling to invest.
I’ve got reasons for not carrying an “Irish Lives Matter” sign.
Granted, being Irish isn’t the same as being black. Or being part of any other perceived ethnic group.
I figure the Irish had an advantage over other alleged “low types.” Some of us look “Anglo-Teutonic.” That arguably helped us gain acceptance by ‘real’ Americans.
Not that “Anglo-Teutonic” Americans of yesteryear were all alike.
But I know that some didn’t.
Including some of my ancestors.
They were, I figure, being good parents.
By their standards.
A charming but unsuitable young man was paying attention to their daughter.
When asked about the disreputable young man’s family, the decent young lady’s mother said “he doesn’t have family. He’s Irish.”
The kids got married anyway. One of their kids became my father.
I’m also half-Norwegian, and that’s almost another topic.
(From Branford Clarke/Pillar of Fire Church, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(Branford Clarke’s cartoon for the Pillar of Fire Church, showing self-identified patriotic Americans defending their country from people like me. (1926))
Can’t say that I blame him.
Seems that he saw the Irish as violent drunkards and ignorant minions of the un-American Pope.
I don’t agree with that view. But I’m part-Irish and Catholic: so it’s not surprising.
Even if I thought the Irish were oppressed in today’s America, “Irish Lives Matter” probably wouldn’t be my favorite slogan.
True, it’s short and easily-remembered.
But someone who’s not Irish, and ambivalent toward the sons of Éire, might imagine that the slogan implied “and yours don’t.”
Particularly if folks who look like me had been been blaming our problems on folks with his or her ancestry.
On the plus side, that slogan clarifies the “black lives matter” version.
And, arguably, may be less likely to inspire perceptions that the more common slogan means ‘our lives matter and yours don’t.’
But with eight words, “all lives…” is at the edge of being too wordy. According to a rule of thumb I learned for writing headlines.
There’s logic in saying that if part of “all” lacks a quality, the quality does not apply to “all.”
But I still think it’s not the ideal slogan for promoting recognition of humanity’s dignity and the dignity of the human person.
I figure that statues mostly just sit there, collecting dust and/or pigeon droppings.
That’s changed, as Floyd fever sweeps the world.
These days, statues apparently inspire vandalism and violence.
I try to remember that others often don’t share my viewpoints. But lately I’ve found myself paraphrasing Shakespeare’s Puck: “what mortals these fools be.”
- “France Colbert row: Statue vandalised over slavery code”
BBC News (June 24, 2020)
- “Theodore Roosevelt statue to be removed by New York museum”
BBC News (June 22, 2020)
- “George Floyd protests: Man shot in clash over Albuquerque statue”
BBC News (June 16, 2020)
Taking these headlines in order, briefly.
“Slavery code” caught my eye in a recent BBC News headline. My first assumption, based partly on having lived through an era when legislative “sunset provisions” were discussed, was that some legal code was overdue for revision.
Turns out that the vandalized statue commemorated Jean-Baptiste Colbert. Colbert was involved in writing the Code Noir: defining slavery and religion in the French colonial empire.
He worked for King Louis XIV. In the late 17th century. Before the French Revolution.6
Meanwhile, back in the States:
New York’s American Museum of Natural History removed an equestrian statue of former president T. Roosevelt.
That makes sense, I think.
The statue shows Roosevelt on horseback, with an American standing at his right and an African at his left.
Neither of which are wearing three-piece business suits.
Current sound and fury being what it is, getting a potential flashpoint out of sight?
Like I said, it makes sense.
The Albuquerque headline is just plain sad.
The statue involved depicts Juan de Oñate, first Spanish Governor of New Mexico: a post he held from November 1598 to April 1606. He’s no poster child for wise and benevolent rule, but I gather that tales of his inhuman atrocities have grown over the years.7
News I’ve seen identifies this month’s Albuquerque victim as a protestor with African ancestors. Who seems to have survived, barely.
The alleged attacker is white and in custody. Where I hope he stays, for the sake of anyone near him.
The statue is out of sight.
Albuquerque’s mayor says he had it removed in the interest of public safety.
Which, in present circumstances, also makes sense.
Attacking statues? Tearing down reminders of history that I don’t like? Doing what I can to convince my neighbors that I really am a threat to their lives, property and culture?
That doesn’t strike me as entirely reasonable.
Emotionally cathartic at the moment, maybe. But not reasonable.
Saturday night, June 20, had become Sunday morning when someone killed someone else in Minneapolis. The last time I checked, police were investigating the homicide. And “gun violence” was in headlines again. Still.
So was Minneapolis leadership’s efforts to take down the city’s police department.
- “Minneapolis Council Moves To Defund Police, Establish ‘Holistic’ Public Safety Force”
Vanessa Romo, NPR (June 26, 2020)
- “11 people in wounded in Minneapolis shooting”
Tim Nelson, Andrew Krueger, Emily Bright; MPR News (June 21, 2020; updated June 23, 2020)
- “‘Tragic And Senseless’: Young Father Dead, 11 Injured In Uptown Shooting Following Night Of Gun Violence In Metro Area”
Marielle Mohs, WCCO CBS Minnesota (June 21, 2020; updated June 23, 2020)
I’m not convinced that killing someone with a gun is worse than killing with a knife or a rope. Whatever technology is used, the victim is dead.
And I’m certainly not going to blame a particular tech for the recent Minneapolis homicide. I think tools can make doing something easier. But I’m quite sure tools, or weapons, don’t make us do things. (November 15, 2017)
About a week later, the homicide victim is still dead. Google Maps still lists businesses near one of that night’s hotspots as “temporarily closed.”
I haven’t read that protestors blamed the weekend’s death and destruction on law enforcement. Maybe nobody’s made that claim. But the Minneapolis City Council is still trying to protect their constituents from the police.
Minneapolis leaders may be on the right track. Or near it.
Or, perhaps less harmlessly, in connection with assorted flavors of alternative medicine.
About that: My family and I go to conventional medical doctors for checkups and treatment.
The closest we get to healing’s groovy fringe is a chiropractor. The sort that sees chiropractic as a system for sorting out musculoskeletal problems. Not something relying on 19th century spiritualism.
I gather that chiropractic is still officially “pseudoscientific.” Can’t say that I’m surprised.
Its founder was colorful. And chiropractors get results that ‘pill-and-injection’ doctors don’t, which wouldn’t endear them to the American Medical Association.
I’m wandering off-topic again.
In other than New Age contexts, “holistic” means something that looks at how a phenomenon’s parts relate to each other. Not at each part in isolation. I think that makes sense, but I also think I’m more than the sum total of my body’s chemicals.8
Maybe Minneapolis City Council members know what “holistic” means, and want to replace the city’s police department with something that looks at law enforcement as one part of a society. If so, like I said: I think they’re on the right track, or close to it.
If their goal is to replace their city’s police with psychology and sociology professors who supervise encounter groups and discussion panels? Maybe not so much.
Either way, I wish folks living in Minneapolis well; and am glad I don’t live there.
Four words: free will and consequences. Or two words: original sin. Which doesn’t mean that humanity is rotten to the core.
The first of us executed a massive lapse in judgement. They decided that their preference was more important than what God wanted. That decision had consequences. (Genesis 3:1–19; Catechism, 390, 396–401)
Our account of humanity’s rocky start is given in figurative language, and that’s even more topics. (Catechism, 390)
Each of us can choose what actions we take. Or choose not to choose, acting on whatever daft impulse bounces across our consciousness. Not choosing is a choice of sorts, a decision to not use whatever good sense we have.
As I see it, our problems aren’t God’s fault. We’re dealing with consequences of a regrettable and regretted decision.
Part of our job is dealing with those consequences: respecting each other and humanity’s transcendent dignity, remembering that we’re supposed to help each other, and working for the common good. (Catechism, 1928–1942)
I’ve talked about that before. A lot:
- “Beyond George Floyd”
(June 6, 2020)
- “Memorial Day Weekend 2020”
(May 23, 2020)
- “Apathy, Angst and Grenfell Tower”
(June 13, 2018)
- “Changing Rules”
(February 4, 2018)
- “‘Renewed and Expansive Hope’”
(June 18, 2017)
Diseases & Conditions, Patient Care & Health Information, Mayo Clinic
- In the news
- “Body cam footage of Rayshard Brooks’ death shows calm, then chaos”
Christian Boone, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (June 14, 2020)
- “Atlanta: Wendy’s restaurant destroyed, 1 police officer fired, 1 put on administrative leave in deadly shooting”
KTVU FOX 2 (June 14, 2020)
- “Body cam footage of Rayshard Brooks’ death shows calm, then chaos”
- My somewhat-serious take
(April 29, 2018)
- Yates v. United States (1957)
Richard Parker, First Amendment Encyclopedia, Middle Tennessee State University
- Yes, hope is an option