And I put links to Lenten resources at the end of this journal entry.1
Doing What I Can
Happily, harming myself isn’t required. The Church recognizes age and disease, makes allowances — and has rules for this sort of thing. Seems I’m too old and too sick for the full fasting experience.
Which leaves me with working out what I will do for Lent this year. Apart from an extra set of prayers and meditations — which I’ll talk about another day. Maybe.
I also plan on changing my online habits during Lent.
If I thought I was overwhelmed by “information overload,” or feared that “loss of identity,” maybe I’d cut back or simply cut out Internet activity. I’m not feeling overwhelmed, and I’m too emphatically “me” to fear loss of identity.
So I’ll continue researching and writing. And plan on adding something new: making a point of reading what a few bloggers write, can commenting when it seems appropriate.
I’ve talked about social media, being Catholic and making sense before:
None of this season’s arrivals will find signs of ancient and exotic Martian cities.
Not the colorful variety imagined by pulp science fiction artists, at any rate.
Anything that big, that blatantly artificial and dust-free would have been spotted by orbiters and/or rovers long since.
Something artificial, but not quite so dust-free? That’s something I’ll talk about later in this series.
NASA press releases have been focusing on the Perseverance rover’s astrobiology tech and the Ingenuity helicopter it’s carrying.
Both are important. But Perseverance also carries a weather station and a geology lab that includes ground penetrating radar and an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer.2
Lowell’s Canals, Mariner 4’s Craters
(From Percival Lowell, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(Lowell’s Martian “canals;” from “Distant Worlds,” Yakov Perelman (1914))
“…On the earth the sea-bottoms still hold seas, on Mars they only nourish vegetation….
“…once fertile fields become deserts….
“…That it [a canal network] joins the surface from pole to pole and girdles it at the equator betrays a single purpose there at work. … Nations must have sunk their local patriotisms in a wider breadth of view and the planet be a unit to the general good….”
(“Mars as the abode of life,” Percival Lowell (1908))
I gather that few, if any, other scientists took Percival Lowell’s Martian canals and the doomed civilization he said was building them seriously. (February 23, 2018)
But they gave generations of science fiction writers a nifty setting.
And I’m drifting off-topic.
The point I’m groping for is that life on Mars seemed possible when I was growing up.
Then, in 1965, Mariner 4 sent back pictures of big craters, small craters — and not much except craters.
Cratered landscapes and a very thin atmosphere made Mars seem more like Earth’s moon than a maybe-habitable planet.3
But Mariner 4 was a flyby mission. What we saw was a strip of Mars that happened to be ‘under’ the spacecraft as it zipped by the planet.
It was as if Martians had gotten pictures and data from part of the Pacific Ocean and decided that Earth was all wet. Covered by water. You know what I mean.
(From NASA/JPL-Caltech, used w/o permission.)
(Mariner 9’s view of Nirgal Vallis, Mars.)
Then we sent spacecraft that stayed in Martian orbit, letting us get more than snapshot of our neighbor. We saw more craters. But we also found what looked a great deal like riverbeds, deltas and other water-sculpted features.
Maybe Mars wasn’t so lifeless after all. Or hadn’t been.
The last I checked, there’s still lively debate about how much Martian water is near the surface and whether observed flows are water, dust or something else.
And whether Vastitas Borealis, the biggest Martian lowland area, was an ocean four billion years back.
There’s chemical and visual evidence that says a Martian ocean existed.4 But if that’s so, scientists have other puzzles. Like where did the water go?
That’s why it’s still the “Mars ocean hypotheses,” not the “Mars Ocean.” I figure that if there was a Martian ocean, we’ll find and analyze enough data to show that it was real.
Then the IAU will decide whether it’s called the Paleo-Ocean, Oceanus Borealis or something entirely different.
Like Ketchum, after Ketchum Lake here in Minnesota. Which is between Lengby and Bijou, two other places you probably never heard of.
Back to the Perseverance rover’s landing site.
MARS 2020 and Jezero Crater
(From ESA/DLR/FU-Berlin, via NASA, used w/o permission.)
(Jezero Crater delta, Mars.)
Jezero Crater’s fan delta looks like the Mississippi River Delta. Not exactly, of course. But land near New Orleans would look a bit like that, if North America and the Gulf of Mexico was a desert. But hadn’t been while the Mississippi river and its silt flowed.
It’s a near-certainty that Jezero Crater was a lake, upwards of 3,500,000,000 years ago. Scans from orbit show that the river in what we call Neretva Vallis carried clay from upstream, dropping it in the Jezero Crater delta.
Neretva Vallis? That’s the Jezero Crater’s inflowing river’s channel. Neretva is a river in the Pliva-Jezero-Plivsko area.
The crater is named after the town of Jezero, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Bosnia and Herzegovina town is on Plivsko Lake and the Pliva River. Which most likely explains why we call another Jezero Crater riverbed Pliva Vallis.
Or, since the Neretva is the a major stream in that region, they’re in the Neretva area.
More to the (scientific) point: if there was life on Mars, that river delta would have been a good place for microcritters. Back when Mars was wetter and presumably warmer than it is now.
The life, if any, would most likely be long gone. But it might have left detectable traces.
And that’s why the Perseverance rover carries a bio lab.5
Perseverance also carries a helicopter.
Ingenuity won’t be doing much science. It’s mostly there to make the first powered flight on another planet.
The Mars helicopter has limited autonomy. And that’s something I’ll save for another day.6
If all goes well, we may find the first evidence of extraterrestrial life this year.
Assuming that we didn’t find it a couple dozen years back.
(From NASA, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(Martian meteorite ALH84001, found in Antarctica’s Allan Hills. (December 27, 1984))
ALH84001 is a rock collected back in December of 1984.
Analysis confirmed that it’s a meteorite. More analysis pegged it as a shergottite-nakhlite-chassignite, or SNC, meteorite.
Don’t bother trying to memorize those names. There won’t be a test. The point is that this particular rock formed on Mars. And was blasted off that planet during an impact.
Either that — or pretty much everything we’ve learned about rocks, planets, physics and chemistry over the last few centuries is wrong. Which strikes me as unlikely.
Assorted Martian/Antarctic rocks got divvied up among assorted scientists. Including some working with NASA.
Then, on August 6, 1996, they said they’d found fossilized microcritters. In ALH84001.7
As I see it, we discovered extraterrestrial life in 1996. Or we didn’t.
Mini-Microbial Martians? Impossible!
(From NASA, via Wikimedia Commons, used w/o permission.)
(Structures in ALH84001, seen through electron microscopy. (1996))
Those blobby linear things look like terrestrial bacteria. Chemical traces associated with them are also associated with terrestrial microcritters.
Problem is, the ALH84001 things are far too small to be bacteria. Terrestrial bacteria simply aren’t that small.
And some current biological theory says single-cell organisms can’t be that small.
I can follow that line of reasoning.
The ALH84001 structures look like bacteria.
But they’re much smaller than terrestrial bacteria. And what we know about cellular biology suggests that single-celled organisms can’t live if they’re under a certain size.8
So the ALH84001 fossils can’t be fossilized organisms.
Or Maybe Not
(From Johnson Space Center/NASA, used w/o permission.)
(Close-up photo of ALH84001, rounded carbonate inclusions. (1995))
On the other hand, ALH84001 is around four billion years old. And from Mars.
And fossilized thingummies in it look like bacteria. Only they’re too small.
And some scientists have showed how non-biological process can leave similar traces.
So maybe the ALH84001 are just weird little shapes that aren’t fossilized Martians.
Or maybe Terrestrial bacteria aren’t just like Martian microcritters.
Again, ALH84001 is about four billion years old. If those shapes are organisms, they lived on Mars during Earth’s early Eoarchean era.
Our bacteria are end products of everything that’s happened during the last 4,000,000,000 years. What’s happened on a planet that’s been mostly covered with water and/or ice. With surface gravity three times that of Mars.
Arguments that the ALH84001 features can’t be fossilized critters strike me as being like someone studying photos of a hummingbird. And proving that it can’t be alive, since it’s so very much smaller than an elephant.
I’ll admit to having a bias.
I’ve seen ball lightning’s status change from superstition to serious science.
And I remember when thunderstorm sprites were obviously — according to highly-confident experts — hallucinations reported by unstable soldiers and pilots.
Then a scientist with the University of Minnesota recorded sprites with a videocam.
To their credit, the scientific community did not close ranks, asserting that videocams can and do hallucinate.
And now we are learning more about transient phenomena and Earth’s weather
I figure one of the problems with ball lightning was that we still don’t know how it works. Sprites are almost another matter. I suspect NIH syndrome — not invented here — may be involved.9 And that’s another topic.
Equivocal Evidence: So Far
I’m willing to imagine that maybe hypothetical Martian critters could have been more, well, Martian than today’s terrestrial bacteria.
Then again, maybe scientists who think nanobacteria can’t exist because they’re not like today’s terrestrial bacteria are right.
But I strongly suspect that we haven’t learned everything there is to know about life, the universe and everything.
Maybe the ALH84001 “hypothetical biogenic features” are fossilized Martian microorganisms. Or maybe they’re not.
Right now, there’s evidence supporting both views. And no evidence disproving either.
Bottom line? We don’t know. Not yet.
But we’ve learned a great deal.
And are learning that we have a very great deal left to learn:
And I’d been getting daily positive reinforcement from the WordPress software that manages this blog’s content.
I’m not one of Pavlov’s dogs, but getting a daily digital ‘attaboy’ felt good. Besides, I figured posting daily might be good mental exercise.
And might encourage folks to check in regularly.
But, as I said a couple weeks and a day back, “I’m not a teen idol pop superstar YouTube influencer….” (January 28, 2021)
Nobody’s going to get excited about my daily routines. I’m not excited about most of what I do. Topics I write about, yes. Flossing my teeth, not so much.
So, now that I’ve shown myself, and anyone who’s had the patience to keep checking, that I can do daily posts; I’ll go back to what I’d been doing — writing these journal entries when I had something to say. Something that might be worth reading, that is.
Like the weather.
Cold, But it Could Be Worse
(From the National Weather Service, used w/o permission.)
(Assorted Wind Chill Advisories and Warnings in the Upper Midwest. (February 12, 2021))
I’ve heard that talking about the weather as common in, say, Hawaii.
Here in the Upper Midwest, Minnesota at any rate, variations on ‘how’s the weather’ vie with ‘how are you’ for top billing as conversation starters.
Maybe that’s because we’re boring people, with nothing else to talk about.
Or, I think more likely, it’s because weather is important it these parts.
One day, back when I was living in Moorhead, Minnesota — it’s across the river from Fargo, neither is in Canada, and that’s another topic — we had dense fog and near-hurricane-force winds in the morning.
Followed by intense thunderstorms and a tornado warning and a blizzard. All before nightfall.
Even up here, that’s unusual.
But like I said: weather is important here. Knowing whether to pack arctic survival gear, sunscreen or a rubber raft matters. Well, maybe not the rubber raft.
Nobody’s daft enough to try driving on a submerged road.
Make that shouldn’t be daft enough. News items about someone falling through ice or not getting out of a sinking car happen. Sad, that.
Meanwhile, Back at My Desk
Anyway, it may be a few days before I write another journal entry. Or weeks. It depends on how routine my routines are. And, this being Minnesota, the weather.
I’ve enjoyed my ‘daily journal’ experiment. But they’ve been taking time that could have been spent on my ‘essay’ posts.
Which reminds me. NASA’s Perseverance rover arrives next week, and I have more to say about that. And Mars. And, most likely, more.
Assorted versions of this quote popped up in my social media feed recently. Usually as a picture of St. Thomas Aquinas with a text overlay.
“He who is not angry when there is just cause for anger is immoral. Why? Because anger looks to the good of justice. And if you can live amid injustice without anger, you are immoral as well as unjust.”
(attr. Thomas Aquinas; via Master_Bruno_1084 on Reddit)
Those four sentences may be a translation of something St. Thomas Aquinas wrote.
Or maybe they’re a summary of what he wrote in “Summa Theologica,” First Part of the Second Part, questions 46 through 48 and Second Part of the Second Part, question 158.1
And maybe what Yogi Berra said applies in this case.
“I really didn’t say everything I said. […] Then again, I might have said ’em, but you never know.”
(Yogi Berra, “The Yogi book: I really didn’t say everything I said!,” p. 9 (1997) via WikiQuote)
In any case, jotting down what I think about anger, justice and making sense is easier than discussing today’s readings. Particularly if I went into what Genesis 2:18–25 and Mark 7:24–30 say about human nature, priorities, faith and all that.
Hmm. I’ve been saying “all that” a lot lately. Moving on.
(Self?) Righteous Rage?
Virtue signalling, displaying outrage with intent to impress, is a new term.
But I’m pretty sure that folks were expressing (self?) righteous outrage at their era’s fascists, communists, racists and long-haired freaks long before Mesannepada launched Ur’s first dynasty.
Mesannepada means “youngling chosen by An.” The name, or maybe title, was more impressive when most folks knew about An. Or Anu, as Akkadians called their top-rank god.2 And that’s another topic.
Anger Happens, Decisions Matter
I got angry while glancing over today’s headlines. As usual.
But I don’t see a point in composing screed aimed at vile malefactors.
Or swearing unswerving loyalty to some politico or party.
I also felt an impulse to despise pretty much all the congressional clowns, regardless of party or position. I don’t think that’s a good idea. In fact, I think it’s a bad idea. Bad for me, that is.
“But I say to you, whoever is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment, and whoever says to his brother, ‘Raqa,’ will be answerable to the Sanhedrin, and whoever says, ‘You fool,’ will be liable to fiery Gehenna.”
On the other hand, I’d be worried if I didn’t feel angry at what I see as injustices.
The trick is remembering that I’m human, and able to think. Letting my emotions show me that something needs attention is one thing. Letting them decide what I do is a bad idea. I’ve said this before. Often. (February 4, 2021; January 11, 2017; October 5, 2016)
Sound, Fury — and Thinking
Getting back to that “…if you can live amid injustice without anger…” meme that’s doing the rounds – I’m not lacking excuses for anger.
But I see no point in adding another outraged voice to my culture’s current scream-fests.
Seriously. How many folks would really want more of the sound and fury that passes for public discussion these days?
And, for that matter, in days of yore.
Take that discussion I talked about yesterday, for example. The one about wine that lasted three days and killed more than 90 folks in Oxford.
Which is why I’ll occasionally explain why I think currently-accepted actions are bad ideas. And why feelings can be okay, and thinking is a good idea.
I'm a sixty-something married guy with four kids in a small central Minnesota town. One of the kids graduated from college in December, 2008, and is helping her husband run a business and raise my granddaughter; another is a cartoonist and artist; #3 daughter is a writer; my son is developing a digital game with #3 and #1 daughters.
"The Princess and the Goblin" is a classic - at least in the sense that it's been re-published many times since 1871, with enough folks buying the reprints to justify yet another reprinting.
The story can be, and has been, described as ...
science-fiction-and-fantasy and faith-belief-religion
Barron's book is an intelligent, informed look at Catholicism's first two millennia.
"Catholicicsm" is "A Journey to the Heart of the Faith" in the sense that Barron touches on the core, the basics, of what the Catholic Church is and ha...
If you've seen the 1997 Derek Jacobi Central Independent Television/ITV screen adaptation of this Ellis Peters novel, you know the setting and general plot.
The mystery is set in England's Shrewsbury region, during what folks started ca...
This blog's header image is from NASA Photo ID ISS011-E-5487, taken 188 nautical miles, 348 kilometers, above 17.6° N, 2.8° E: available from Earth Science and Remote Sensing Unit, NASA Johnson Space Center.
The opinions expressed in this blog are my own. As a Catholic layman, I make an effort to be informed about the teachings of the Church, and will repeat what I have found. For more 'official' statements, I suggest that you talk to a priest or deacon in your area. Or check out the 'Official' websites on my Blogroll page.
I make an effort to select meaningful and qualified information for the external links I create. However, I have no control over websites or blogs other than mine, and cannot be held responsible for their contents.
I have very limited control over advertisements and video links appearing on this blog. I do not necessarily endorse any of them.